Journals / Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 5

Managing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related complications in patients referred to the surgical emergency unit

Pages
395–399
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Moderate and severe complications may increase the mortality rates, particularly in high-risk patients

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to present our experience in the management of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related complications in patients referred to our surgical emergency unit by various endoscopy centers.METHODS: A retrospective investigation was conducted on the records of the 54 patients who were referred to our surgical emergency unit between October 2005 and January 2014 due to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related complications.RESULTS: There were 25 and 29 female and male patients, respectively.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Pancreatitis was the most common complication (38.8%).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Moderate and severe complications may increase the mortality rates, particularly in high-risk patients
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2005 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The goal of this study was to present our experience in the management of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related complications in patients referred to our surgical emergency unit by various endoscopy centers.METHODS: A retrospective investigation was conducted on the records of the 54 patients who were referred to our surgical emergency unit between October 2005 and January 2014 due to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related complications.RESULTS: There were 25 and 29 female and male patients, respectively. Pancreatitis was the most common complication (38.8%). Perforation (27.7%), infection (20.3%), and bleeding (12.9%) were the other complications. In 22.2% of cases, patients were died. The mortality rate was the highest in patients with perforation (40%). The mean age of the patients who were died due to complications was 75.9 years (range, 47–94 years). In total, 41.6% of the patients were died within the first week and 33.3% were died within the second week following ERCP. Nearly half of these patients had a cancerous disease (one had metastatic breast cancer, one had a gallbladder cancer, one had a duodenal cancer, and the other three had periampullary cancers) and 50% of the patients who died also had cardiopulmonary and/or cerebrovascular disorders.CONCLUSION: Comprehending and managing the main risk factors can minimize complications; however, they would not be eliminated. Moderate and severe complications may increase the mortality rates, particularly in high-risk patients

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞİMŞEK, O., ŞİMŞEK, A., ERGUN, S., VELİDEDEOĞLU, M., SARIBEYOĞLU, K., PEKMEZCİ, S. (2017). Managing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related complications in patients referred to the surgical emergency unit. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 5, 395–399. https://ajindex.com/articles/323991

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Cohen S, Bacon BR, Berlin JA, Fleischer D, Hecht GA, Loehrer PJ, et al. National Institutes of Health state of the science conference statement: ERCP for diagnosis and therapy, January 14-16, 2002. Gastrointest Endosc 2002;56:803–9
  2. Freeman ML. Adverse outcomes of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 2002;56:273–82
  3. Anderson MA, Fisher L, Jain R, Evans JA, Appalaneni V, Ben-Menachem T, et al. Complications of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 2012;75:467–73
  4. Koçak E, Filik L. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography complications. Endoskopi Dergisi 2010;18:19–22
  5. Guda NM, Reddy DN, Kumar A. Complications of ERCP. Indian J Gastroenterol 2014;33:1–9
  6. Cotton P, Lehman G, Vennes J, Geenen J, Russell R, Meyers W, et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc 1991;37:383–93
  7. Halme L, Doepel M, von Numers H, Edgren J, Ahonen J. Complications of diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP. Ann Chir Gynaecol 1999;88:127–31
  8. Farrell RJ, Mahmud N, Noonan N, Kellcher D, Keeling PW. Diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a large single centre’s experience. Ir J Med Sci 2001;170:176–80
  9. Andriulli A, Loperfido S, Napolitano G, Niro G, Valvano MR, Spirito F, et al. Incidence rates of post-ERCP complications: a systematic survey of prospective studies. Am J Gastroenterol 2007;102:1781–8
  10. Kochar B, Akshintala VS, Afghani E, Elmunzer BJ, Kim KJ, Lennon AM, et al. Incidence, severity, and mortality of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a systematic review by using randomized, controlled trials. Gastrointest Endosc 2015;81:143–9
  11. Ferreira LE, Baron TH. Post-sphincterotomy bleeding: who, what, when, and how. Am J Gastroenterol 2007;102:2850–8
  12. Banerjee S, Shen B, Baron TH, Nelson DB, Anderson MA, Cash BD, et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis for GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2008;67:791–8
  13. Cotton PB, Connor P, Rawls E, Romagnuolo J. Infection after ERCP, and antibiotic prophylaxis: a sequential quality-improvement approach over 11 years. Gastrointest Endosc 2008;67:471–5.