Journals / Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 4

Çocuklarda travmatik ciddi hifemalarda demografik ve etyolojik özellikler

Demographic and etiologic characteristics of children with traumatic serious hyphema

Pages
357–362
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Considering the bad visual prognosis of severe hyphema patients, prompt treatment and close follow-up may prevent complications resulting in poor VA.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:BACKGROUNDWe aimed to evaluate the etiologic factors, complications, follow-up, and treatment outcomes in serious hyphema following blunt ocular trauma in childhood.METHODSThe medical records of 136 patients diagnosed as grade 3 or 4 hyphema due to blunt ocular trauma between January 2006 and December 2011 were evaluated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Factors affecting visual prognosis were compared in grade 3 and 4 hyphema cases.RESULTSThe mean age of patients was 9.7±4 years.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Considering the bad visual prognosis of severe hyphema patients, prompt treatment and close follow-up may prevent complications resulting in poor VA.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2006 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

BACKGROUNDWe aimed to evaluate the etiologic factors, complications, follow-up, and treatment outcomes in serious hyphema following blunt ocular trauma in childhood.METHODSThe medical records of 136 patients diagnosed as grade 3 or 4 hyphema due to blunt ocular trauma between January 2006 and December 2011 were evaluated. Visual acuity (VA), complications, and medical and surgical treatments were analyzed. Factors affecting visual prognosis were compared in grade 3 and 4 hyphema cases.RESULTSThe mean age of patients was 9.7±4 years. Etiologic factors for trauma were stone in 53 (39%), bead bullet in 25 (18.4%) and others in 58 (42.6%) patients. The most common complication of grade 3 and 4 hyphema was traumatic mydriasis (19.1%), followed by cataract (9.6%) and glaucoma (5.1%). Medical treatment was successful in 114 (83.8%) patients, and 22 (16.2%) patients underwent surgery. Mean initial and final VA of grade 4 patients were found to be significantly lower than those of grade 3 patients.CONCLUSIONIn grade 3 and 4 hyphema due to blunt trauma, visual prognosis worsened in the presence of additional ocular pathologies. Considering the bad visual prognosis of severe hyphema patients, prompt treatment and close follow-up may prevent complications resulting in poor VA.

Özet

AMAÇÇocuk yaş grubunda künt göz travmaları sonrası oluşan ciddi hifemalarda etyolojik faktörler, oluşan komplikasyonlar, takip ve tedavi sonuçları değerlendirildi.GEREÇ VE YÖNTEMOcak 2006 ile Aralık 2011 yılları arasında künt göz travması nedeni ile evre 3 ve 4 hifema tanısı alan ve tedavisi yapılmış 136 hastanın dosyası geriye dönük olarak incelendi. Görme keskinliği (GK), gözlenen komplikasyonlar, uygulanan medikal ve cerrahi tedaviler kaydedildi. Evre 3 ve 4 olgularda görme prognozu üzerinde etkili faktörler ve tedavi sonuçları karşılaştırıldı.BULGULARHastaların yaş ortalamaları 9,7±4 yıl idi. Travmaya sebep olan etyolojik faktörler sırası ile taş çarpması 53 (%39), boncuk mermisi 25 (%18,4) ve diğer faktörler 58 (%42,6) oluşturmakta idi. Evre 3 ve 4 hifemanın en sık komplikasyonu travmatik midriyazis (%19,1) iken bunu katarakt (%9,6) ve glokom (%5,1) izlemekteydi. İlaç tedavisi 114 (%83,8) olguda başarılı olurken, 22 (%16,2) olguda cerrahi gerekti. İlk ve son GK evre 4 olgularda evre 3’lere göre belirgin olarak daha düşüktü.SONUÇKünt travma nedeni ile hifema gelişen evre 3 ve 4 olgularda ilave göz patolojileri nedeni ile görme prognozu olumsuz etkilenebilmektedir. Ciddi hifemalı olgularda görme prognozundaki olumsuz seyir göz önüne alınarak bu hastaların yakın takibi ve tedavisi oluşabilecek komplikasyonların kalıcı etkilerini önleyebilecektir.

🔖

Cite This Article

TÜRKÇÜ, F. M., YÜKSEL, H., ŞAHİN, A., CINGÜ, K., ARI, Ş., ÇINAR, Y., ŞAHİN, M., YILDIRIM, A., ÇAÇA, İ. (2013). Çocuklarda travmatik ciddi hifemalarda demografik ve etyolojik özellikler. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 4, 357–362. https://ajindex.com/articles/323883

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Walton W, Von Hagen S, Grigorian R, Zarbin M. Manage- ment of traumatic hyphema. Surv Ophthalmol 2002;47:297- 334
  2. Pearlman JA, Au Eong KG, Kuhn F, Pieramici DJ. Airbags and eye injuries: epidemiology, spectrum of injury, and anal- ysis of risk factors. Surv Ophthalmol 2001;46:234-42
  3. Lai JC, Fekrat S, Barrón Y, Goldberg MF. Traumatic hyphe- ma in children: risk factors for complications. Arch Ophthal- mol 2001;119:64-70
  4. Strahlman E, Elman M, Daub E, Baker S. Causes of pediat- ric eye injuries. A population-based study. Arch Ophthalmol 1990;108:603-6
  5. Kargı SH, Demirbay P, Özdal P, Yarpuz IM, Caliskan B, Teke M ve ark. Künt göz travmalarının klinik değerlendirilmesi. T Oft Gaz 2002;32:863-8
  6. Wilson FM. Traumatic hyphema. Pathogenesis and manage- ment. Ophthalmology 1980;87:910-9
  7. Wong TY, Tielsch JM. A population-based study on the inci- dence of severe ocular trauma in Singapore. Am J Ophthal- mol 1999;128:345-51
  8. Canavan YM, Archer DB. Anterior segment consequences of blunt ocular injury. Br J Ophthalmol 1982;66:549-55
  9. Shiuey Y, Lucarelli MJ. Traumatic hyphema: outcomes of outpatient management. Ophthalmology 1998;105:851-5. 10.Campbell DG. Ghost cell glaucoma following trauma. Oph- thalmology 1981;88:1151-8. 11.Agapitos PJ, Noel LP, Clarke WN. Traumatic hyphema in children. Ophthalmology 1987;94:1238-41. 12.DeRespinis PA, Caputo AR, Fiore PM, Wagner RS. A sur- vey of severe eye injuries in children. Am J Dis Child 1989;143:711-6. 13.Farber MD, Fiscella R, Goldberg MF. Aminocaproic acid versus prednisone for the treatment of traumatic hyphema. A randomized clinical trial. Ophthalmology 1991;98:279-86. 14.Spoor TC, Kwitko GM, O’Grady JM, Ramocki JM. Trau- matic hyphema in an urban population. Am J Ophthalmol 1990;109:23-7. 15.Ashaye AO. Traumatic hyphaema: a report of 472 consecu- tive cases. BMC Ophthalmol 2008;8:24. 16.Ng CS, Strong NP, Sparrow JM, Rosenthal AR. Factors relat- ed to the incidence of secondary haemorrhage in 462 patients with traumatic hyphema. Eye (Lond) 1992;6:308-12. 17.Fong LP. Secondary hemorrhage in traumatic hyphema. Predictive factors for selective prophylaxis. Ophthalmology 1994;101:1583-8. 18.Baker RS, Wilson MR, Flowers CW Jr, Lee DA, Wheeler NC. Demographic factors in a population-based survey of hospitalized, work-related, ocular injury. Am J Ophthalmol 1996;122:213-9. 19.Rakusin W. Traumatic hyphema. Am J Ophthalmol 1972;74:284-92. 20.Kearns P. Traumatic hyphaema: a retrospective study of 314 ca