Journals / Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 4

Effects of abdominal adhesion-preventing 4% icodextrin solution on healing of bowel anastomoses

Karın içi adezyon önleyici %4\'lük ikodekstrin solüsyonunun gastrointestinal sistem anastomozları üzerine etkisi

Pages
305–312
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We also reported herein the biochemical and histopathological results and adhesion scores.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:BACKGROUNDWe aimed to introduce the efficiency of 4% icodextrin solution on preventing adhesions and its effect on anastomotic healing, together with biochemical parameters.METHODSIn total, 40 rats were divided into four groups of 10 rats each as Group A (abrasion+icodextrin), Group B (abrasion), Group C (anastomosis+icodextrin), and Group D (anastomosis).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Adhesion grade, anastomotic bursting pressure, histopathological analysis, tissue hydroxyproline level, and serum myeloperoxidase (MPO), nitric oxide (NO), and malondialdehyde (MDA) values were examined.RESULTSAdhesion score was significantly lower in Group A than in Group B and significantly lower in Group C than in Group D (p=0.003577, p=0.001612).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We also reported herein the biochemical and histopathological results and adhesion scores.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

BACKGROUNDWe aimed to introduce the efficiency of 4% icodextrin solution on preventing adhesions and its effect on anastomotic healing, together with biochemical parameters.METHODSIn total, 40 rats were divided into four groups of 10 rats each as Group A (abrasion+icodextrin), Group B (abrasion), Group C (anastomosis+icodextrin), and Group D (anastomosis). Adhesion grade, anastomotic bursting pressure, histopathological analysis, tissue hydroxyproline level, and serum myeloperoxidase (MPO), nitric oxide (NO), and malondialdehyde (MDA) values were examined.RESULTSAdhesion score was significantly lower in Group A than in Group B and significantly lower in Group C than in Group D (p=0.003577, p=0.001612). No difference in anastomoses healing was determined between Group C and Group D (p=0.816). Hydroxyproline level was significantly higher in Group A than in Group B and significantly higher in Group C than in Group D (p=0.001, p=0.0001). There were no differences in NO and MDA levels between Group A and Group B, but values were significantly lower in Group C than in Group D (p=0.434, p=0.001, p=0.116, p=0.018). MPO level was significantly lower in Group A than in Group B and significantly lower in Group C than in Group D (p=0.0001, p=0.0001).CONCLUSIONBased on our results, 4% icodextrin solution evidently decreased the formation of adhesion without negatively affecting the anastomotic healing. We also reported herein the biochemical and histopathological results and adhesion scores.

Özet

AMAÇ%4’lük ikodekstrin solüsyonunun adezyonu önlemedeki etkinliğini ve anastomoz iyileşmesi üzerine etkisini, biyokimyasal parametrelerle birlikte ortaya koymak.GEREÇ VE YÖNTEMToplam 40 sıçan 10’ar sıçandan oluşan dört gruba ayrıldı. Grup A (abrazyon+ikodekstrn), Grup B (abrazyon), Grup C (anastomoz+ikodekstrin), Grup D (anastomoz). Gruplarda adezyon skoru, anastomoz patlama basıncı, histopatolojik inceleme, doku hidroksiprolin düzeyi, miyeloperoksidaz (MPO), nitrik oksit (NO) ve malondialdehit (MDA) değerlerine bakıldı.BULGULARAdezyon skoru A grubunda B grubuna oranla, C grubunda D grubuna oranla daha düşük bulundu (p=0,003577, p=0,001612). Grup C ve Grup D arasında anastomoz iyileşmesi arasında fark yoktu (p=0,816). Hidroksiprolin düzeyi A grubunda B grubuna oranla, C grubunda D grubuna oranla daha yüksekti (p=0,001, p=0,0001). NO ve MDA düzeyleri bakımından Grup A ve Grup B arasında fark yoktu, Grup C’de ise D grubuna oranla daha düşüktü (p=0,434, p=0,001, p=0,116, p=0,018). MPO değerleri Grup A’da B grubuna oranla, Grup C’de, Grup D’ye oranla daha düşük saptandı (p=0,0001).SONUÇ%4’lik ikodekstrin solüsyonunun anastomoz iyileşmesini olumsuz yönde etkilemeden adezyon oluşumunu belirgin olarak azalttığı biyokimyasal parametreler, histopatolojik inceleme ve adezyon skorlaması ile ortaya kondu.

🔖

Cite This Article

KOÇ, O., DAĞ, A., ÖCAL, A. K., DİRLİK, M. M., ÇÖMELEKOĞLU, Ü., GÜMÜŞ, L. T., SERİNSÖZ, E., KANIK, E. A., AKÇA, H. (2013). Effects of abdominal adhesion-preventing 4% icodextrin solution on healing of bowel anastomoses. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 4, 305–312. https://ajindex.com/articles/323874

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Saribeyoğlu K, Pekmezci S, Korman U, Kol E, Baca B, Günay S. Selective laparoscopic adhesiolysis in the manage ment of acute and chronic recurrent adhesive bowel obstruc tion. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 2008;14:28-33
  2. Ditzel M, Deerenberg EB, Komen N, Mulder IM, Jeekel H, Lange JF. Postoperative adhesion prevention with a new bar rier: an experimental study. Eur Surg Res 2012;48:187-93
  3. Lang RA, Grüntzig PM, Weisgerber C, Weis C, Odermatt EK, Kirschner MH. Polyvinyl alcohol gel prevents ab dominal adhesion formation in a rabbit model. Fertil Steril 2007;88:1180-6
  4. Müller SA, Treutner KH, Anurov M, Titkova S, Oettinger AP, Schumpelick V. Experimental evaluation of phospholipids and icodextrin in re-formation of peritoneal adhesions. Br J Surg 2003;90:1604-7
  5. Verco SJ, Peers EM, Brown CB, Rodgers KE, Roda N, diZerega G. Development of a novel glucose polymer solu tion (icodextrin) for adhesion prevention: pre-clinical studies. Hum Reprod 2000;15:1764-72
  6. Tepetes K, Asprodini EK, Christodoulidis G, Spyridakis M, Kouvaras E, Hatzitheofilou K. Prevention of postoperative adhesion formation by individual and combined administra tion of 4 per cent icodextrin and dimetindene maleate. Br J Surg 2009;96:1476-83
  7. Baca B, Boler DE, Onur E, Akca O, Hamzaoglu I, Karahas anoglu T, et al. Icodextrin and Seprafilm do not interfere with colonic anastomosis in rats. Eur Surg Res 2007;39:318-23
  8. Rodgers KE, Verco SJ, diZerega GS. Effects of intraperito neal 4% icodextrin solution on the healing of bowel anasto moses and laparotomy incisions in rabbits. Colorectal Dis 2003;5:324-30
  9. Pascual I, Fernández de Miguel G, García Arranz M, García- Olmo D. Biosutures improve healing of experimental weak colonic anastomoses. Int J Colorectal Dis 2010;25:1447- 51. 10.Dijkstra FR, Nieuwenhuijzen M, Reijnen MM, van Goor H. Recent clinical developments in pathophysiology, epidemiol- ogy, diagnosis and treatment of intra-abdominal adhesions. Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl 2000;232:52-9. 11.Olfert ED, Cross BM, McWilliam AA. Guide to the care and use of experimental animals. Canada, Canadian Council on Animal Care 1993;1-298. 12.Bergman I, Loxly R. Two impaired and simplified methods for the spectro-photometric determination of hydroxyproline. Ann Chem 1963;35:1961-5. 13.Green LC, Wagner DA, Glogowski J, Skipper PL, Wishnok JS, Tannenbaum SR. Analysis of nitrate, nitrite, and [15N] nitrate in biological fluids. Anal Biochem 1982;126:131-8. 14.Yagi K. Simple procedu