Journals / Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 4

Use of trauma scoring systems to determine the physician’s responsibility in cases of traumatic death with medical malpractice claim

Pages
328–336
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

All contributing factors to trauma severity should be considered along with the trauma score and other case factors

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:BACKGROUND: Traumatic injury is near the top of World Health Organization list of leading causes of death, and one of the major factors affecting mortality is the severity of the trauma.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The objective of this study was to provide a new approach to evaluating medical malpractice cases by discussing the benefits of the use of trauma scores.METHODS: Cases of alleged malpractice that were discussed and concluded between 2010 and 2013 were selected from the case archive of the General Committee of the Council of Forensic Medicine (GC of CFM).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:All contributing factors to trauma severity should be considered along with the trauma score and other case factors
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Traumatic injury is near the top of World Health Organization list of leading causes of death, and one of the major factors affecting mortality is the severity of the trauma. During medical intervention for trauma patients, some injuries may be overlooked, and this misstep may be the basis of a malpractice claim. The objective of this study was to provide a new approach to evaluating medical malpractice cases by discussing the benefits of the use of trauma scores.METHODS: Cases of alleged malpractice that were discussed and concluded between 2010 and 2013 were selected from the case archive of the General Committee of the Council of Forensic Medicine (GC of CFM). Injury severity scores were calculated from the medical records of accused physicians and from the autopsy or final clinical evaluation records and compared.RESULTS: Between the years 2010 and 2013, 263 cases of alleged medical malpractice were discussed and concluded by the general committee. Of these, in 25 cases of patient death, the reason for admission to the hospital was traumatic injury. Various surgical specialties were involved. In these 25 cases, 34 physicians were accused of medical malpractice, and the General Committee classified the interventions of 14 physicians in 12 cases as “malpractice.” Missed injuries and unrecognized diagnoses can be established by comparing the Injury Severity Score and New Injury Severity Score values in the findings of accused physicians with the subsequent findings of last evaluation or autopsy.CONCLUSION: In a medical malpractice case, calculating injury severity scores may assist an expert witness or judge to detect any unseen injuries and to determine the likely survival potential of the patient, but these values do not provide enough information to evaluate all of the evidence or draw conclusions about the entire case. All contributing factors to trauma severity should be considered along with the trauma score and other case factors

🔖

Cite This Article

ARSLAN, M. N., KERTMEN, C., MELEZ, D. O., EVCUMAN, D., BÜYÜK, Y. (2017). Use of trauma scoring systems to determine the physician’s responsibility in cases of traumatic death with medical malpractice claim. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 4, 328–336. https://ajindex.com/articles/323688

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Copes WS, Lawnick M, Champion HR, Sacco WJ. A comparison of Abbreviated Injury Scale 1980 and 1985 versions. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 1988;28:78–86
  2. Toka H, Karbeyaz K, Gündüz T, Balcı Y. Could postmortem ISS and NISS points sign preventable deaths? The Bulletin of Legal Medicine 2010;15:4–12
  3. İnce CH, İnce N, Taviloğlu K, Güloğlu R. A different approach to trauma scoring. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 2006;12:195–200
  4. Orhon R, Eren ŞH, Karadayı Ş, Korkmaz İ, Coşkun A, Eren M, et al. Comparison of trauma scores for predicting mortality and morbidity on trauma patients. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 2014;20:258–64
  5. Injuries and Violence. The Facts 2014. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2014. Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/ bitstream/10665/149798/1/9789241508018_eng.pdf?ua=1&ua=1
  6. Özgüç H, Kaya E, Korun N. Factors affecting outcome in the resuscitation of trauma. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 1995;1:51–8
  7. Guidelines for Trauma Quality Improvement Programmes. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2009. Available from: http://apps. who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/44061/1/9789241597746_eng.pdf
  8. Copes WS, Champion HR, Sacco WJ, Lawnick MM, Gann DS, Gennarelli T, et al. Progress in characterizing anatomic injury. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 1990;30:1200–7
  9. Günay Y. Trauma scoring and forensic medicine. The Bulletin of Legal Medicine 1999;4:65–73
  10. Baker SP, o’Neill B, Haddon Jr W, Long WB. The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 1974;14:187–96
  11. Eid HO, Abu-Zidan FM. New Injury Severity Score is a better predictor of mortality for blunt trauma patients than the Injury Severity Score. World J Surg 2014;39:165–71
  12. Elçi Ç. Comparison of antemortem and postmortem trauma scores [Unpublished Thesis]. İstanbul, Turkey: The Council of Forensic Medicine, Ministry of Justice 2013
  13. Subedi N, Yadav B, Jha S. Application of Abbreviated Injury Scale and Injury Severity Score in fatal cases with abdominopelvic injuries. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 2014;35:275–7
  14. Adams VI, Carrubba C. The Abbreviated Injury Scale: application to autopsy data. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 1998;19:246–51
  15. Riddick L, Long WB, Copes WS, Dove DM, Sacco WJ. Automated coding of injuries from autopsy reports. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 1998;19:269–74
  16. Eryılmaz M, Durusu M, Cantürk G, Menteş MÖ, Özer MT. Role of anatomic and physiolog