Journals / Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 5

An evaluation of the effect of ertapenem in rats with sepsis created by cecal ligation and puncture

Pages
427–432
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The findings suggest that the results should be evaluated in a clinical trial.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:BACKGROUND: Intra-abdominal adhesions are still a major problem which is expected to be reduced by the provision of bacterial decontamination.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Group 1 was considered as sham group.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The findings suggest that the results should be evaluated in a clinical trial.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

BACKGROUND: Intra-abdominal adhesions are still a major problem which is expected to be reduced by the provision of bacterial decontamination. Various antibiotics have been used to prevent the formation of adhesion in the septic abdomen. This study aims to investigate the efficacy of ertapenem in sepsis of rats induced by cecal ligation and puncture. METHODS: Twenty-eight Wistar rats were divided into four groups randomly. In all groups, bacterial peritonitis was created by cecal ligation and puncture method. Group 1 was considered as sham group. Groups 2, 3 and 4 were given, respectively, saline, a single dose of ertapenem and a dose of ertapenem intraperitoneally every day. Intra-abdominal adhesions were assessed seven days after surgery by histopathological examination. Microbiological examination was performed through the ascites obtained. TNF-α was measured from blood taken from rats. RESULTS: Adhesion score decreased significantly by the application of ertapenem (p<0.001) and fibrosis scores were found to be significantly lower (p=0.005). Among all groups, the relationship between the decrease in the number of colonies and antibiotics application was not statistically significant (p=0.109). No statistically significant difference was found between the group given a single dose of ertapenem and the group given multiple ertapenem (p=1). CONCLUSION: Peritoneal lavage with ertapenem appears to be effective in preventing the adhesion in the septic abdomen. As no difference was detected at the end of a single dose and multiple-dose administration of antibiotics in the adhesion scores, a single dose after surgery seems to be enough. The findings suggest that the results should be evaluated in a clinical trial.

🔖

Cite This Article

SERİN, B. G., KÖSE, Ş., YILMAZ, O., YILDIRIM, M., AKBULUT, İ., SENGER, S. S., AKKOÇLU, G., DİNİZ, G., SERİN, S. (2019). An evaluation of the effect of ertapenem in rats with sepsis created by cecal ligation and puncture. Ulusal Travma ve Acil Cerrahi Dergisi, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 5, 427–432. https://ajindex.com/articles/323571

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Cinel I, Dellinger RP. Advances in pathogenesis and management of sepsis. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2007;20:345–52
  2. Gogos CA, Drosou E, Bassaris HP, Skoutelis A. Pro- versus anti-inflammatory cytokine profile in patients with severe sepsis: a marker for prognosis and future therapeutic options. J Infect Dis 2000;181:176–80
  3. Bicalho PR, Mayrink CA, Fernandes F, Alvarenga DG, Nunes TA, Reis FA, et al. Chlorhexidine as a factor that promotes peritoneal adhesions in rats with induced peritonitis. Acta Cir Bras 2013;28:641–5
  4. Kayaoğlu HA, Ozkan N, Yenidoğan E, Köseoğlu RD. Effect of antibiotic lavage in adhesion prevention in bacterial peritonitis. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 2013;19:189–94
  5. Bothin C, Okada M, Midtvedt T, Perbeck L. The intestinal flora influences adhesion formation around surgical anastomoses. Br J Surg 2001;88:143–5
  6. Abramov Y, Golden B, Sullivan M, Botros SM, Miller JJ, Alshahrour A, et al. Histologic characterization of vaginal vs. abdominal surgical wound healing in a rabbit model. Wound Repair Regen 2007;15:80–6
  7. Arung W, Meurisse M, Detry O. Pathophysiology and prevention of postoperative peritoneal adhesions. World J Gastroenterol 2011;17:4545–53. 8. van Goor H, de Graaf JS, Grond J, Sluiter WJ, van der Meer J, Bom VJ, et al. Fibrinolytic activity in the abdominal cavity of rats with faecal peritonitis. Br J Surg 1994;81:1046–9. 9. van Goor H, Bom VJ, van der Meer J, Sluiter WJ, Bleichrodt RP. Coagulation and fibrinolytic responses of human peritoneal fluid and plasma to bacterial peritonitis. Br J Surg 1996;83:1133–5
  8. Thompson JN, Whawell SA. Pathogenesis and prevention of adhesion formation. Br J Surg 1995;82:3–5
  9. Lorian V, Ernst J. Effects of antibiotics on bacterial structure and their pathogenicity. Pathol Biol (Paris) 1987;35(10 Pt 2):1370–6
  10. Shah PM, Isaacs RD. Ertapenem, the first of a new group of carbapenems. J Antimicrob Chemother 2003;52:538–42
  11. Kirdak T, Uysal E, Korun N. Assessment of effectiveness of different doses of methylprednisolone on intraabdominal adhesion prevention. [Article in Turkish]. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 2008;14:188–91
  12. Günaydın M, Güvenç D, Yıldız L, Aksoy A, Tander B, Bıçakcı Ü, et al. Comparison of substances used for prevention of intra-abdominal adhesions: an experimental study in rats. Turkiye Klinikleri J Med Sci 2012;32:337–45
  13. Jallouli M, Hakim A, Znazen A, Sahnoun Z, Kallel H, Zghal K, et al. Rifamycin lavage in the treatment of experimental intra-