Journals / Uluslararası Hematoloji-Onkoloji Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 1

Pediatrik febril nötropeni hastalarında sefoperazon-sulbaktam ve amikasin sülfat birlikteliğinin klinik etkinliği

The clinical efficacy of cephoperazone- sulbactam and amikacin sulfate combination in pediatric febrile neutropenic patients

Pages
34–39
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Although cephoperazone-sulbactam plus amikacin regimen was shown to be effective in febrile neutropenia treatment of pediatric hematology patients, large prospective clinical trials are necessary to determine the clinical affectivity and safety of that particular regimen in patients with ANC values of 500 /μl and lower.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The efficacy of cephoperazone-sulbactam and amikacin sulfate combination in febrile neutropenic patients followed in pediatric hematology department was retrospectively evaluated in this study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:We retrospectively investigated 20 patients whom were treated with the cephoperazone-sulbactam and amikacin sulfate combination due to febrile neutropenia between June 2007 and February 2008 which were followed in pediatric hematology department of our hospital.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Although cephoperazone-sulbactam plus amikacin regimen was shown to be effective in febrile neutropenia treatment of pediatric hematology patients, large prospective clinical trials are necessary to determine the clinical affectivity and safety of that particular regimen in patients with ANC values of 500 /μl and lower.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2007 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The efficacy of cephoperazone-sulbactam and amikacin sulfate combination in febrile neutropenic patients followed in pediatric hematology department was retrospectively evaluated in this study. We retrospectively investigated 20 patients whom were treated with the cephoperazone-sulbactam and amikacin sulfate combination due to febrile neutropenia between June 2007 and February 2008 which were followed in pediatric hematology department of our hospital. Their diagnoses were acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), acute myeloid leukemia (AML), Fanconi aplastic anemia (FAA) and acquired aplastic anemia (AA). All cultures of patients were taken and then 3 doses of 150 mg/kg/day cephoperazone-sulbactam intravenously and one dose of 15 mg/kg/day amikacine sulphate intravenously were administered. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to the clinical findings and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels in the 5th day of treatment. The response to cephoperazone-sulbactam-amikacin treatment was good in 14 patients, moderate in 2 patients and poor in 4 patients. The average time for fever to decrease were 2.5 days in good response group and 5 days in moderate response group, while average time for fever to decrease was more than 5 days in poor response group. Statistically the 5th day absolute neutrophile value was not significantly higher between the groups. The efficacy ratio of the drug was 70%. Although cephoperazone-sulbactam plus amikacin regimen was shown to be effective in febrile neutropenia treatment of pediatric hematology patients, large prospective clinical trials are necessary to determine the clinical affectivity and safety of that particular regimen in patients with ANC values of 500 /μl and lower.

Özet

Bu çalışmada pediatrik hematoloji bölümünde takip edilen febril nötropenik olgularda sefoperazon-sulbaktam ve aminoglikozid kombinasyonunun etkinliği retrospektif olarak değerlendirilmiştir. Haziran 2007- fiubat 2008 tarihleri arasında hastanemizin pediatrik hematoloji bölümünde akut lenfoblastik lösemi (ALL), akut myeloid lösemi (AML), Fanconi aplastik anemi (FAA), akkiz aplastik anemi (AA) tanıları ile izlenen ve febril nötropeni nedeni ile sefoperazon-sulbaktam ve amikasin sülfat tedavisi alan 20 hastanın kayıtları retrospektif olarak incelendi. Hastaların kültürleri alındıktan sonra sefoperazon-sulbaktam 150 mg/kg/gün 3 dozda intravenöz ve amikasin sülfat 15 mg/kg/gün tek dozda intravenöz olarak başlanmıştı. Tedavinin 5. günündeki klinik bulguları ve C-reaktif protein (CRP) değerlerine göre hastalar 3 grupta incelendi. Sefoperazon-sulbaktam ve amikasin tedavisine yanıt 14 hastada iyi, 2 hastada orta, 4 hastada ise kötü idi. Ortalama ateş düşme süresi iyi olan grupta 2.5 gün, orta olan grupta 5 gün olarak bulundu. Kötü olan grupta ise ortalama ateş düşme süresi 5 günden uzundu. Beşinci gün Absolü nötrofil sayısı (ANS) değeri gruplar arasında farklı bulunmadı. İlacın etkinlik oranı %70 bulundu. Sefoperazon-sulbaktam ve amikasin rejiminin pediatrik hematoloji hastalarındaki febril nötropeni tedavisinde etkin gibi görünse de, ANS değeri 500/μl ve altında olan hastalarda klinik etkinliğinin ve güvenirliliğinin değerlendirilebilmesi için prospektif olarak yapılacak daha kapsamlı çalışlmalara ihtiyaç vardır.

🔖

Cite This Article

IŞIK, P., YARALI, H. N., BAY, A., SAÇ, R., KARA, A., TUNÇ, B. (2011). Pediatrik febril nötropeni hastalarında sefoperazon-sulbaktam ve amikasin sülfat birlikteliğinin klinik etkinliği. Uluslararası Hematoloji-Onkoloji Dergisi, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 1, 34–39. https://ajindex.com/articles/322948

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Karlowsky JA, Jones ME, Draghi DC. Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibilities of bacteria isolated from blood cultures of hospitalized patients in the United States in 2002. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 3: 7, 2004
  2. Jarque I, Sanz MA. Application of the concepts of evidence-based medicine to the evidence on the treatment of febrile neutropenia. Enferm Infec Microbiol Clin 17 Suppl 2: 95-102, 1999
  3. Sanz MA, López J, Lahuerta JJ. Cefepime plus amikacin versus piperacillin-tazobactam plus amikacin for initial antibiotic therapy in haematology patients with febrile neutropenia: results of an open, randomized, multicentre trial. J Antimicrob Chemother 50: 79-88, 2002
  4. Bonnet R. Growing group of extended-spectrum betalactamases: the CTX-M enzymes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 48: 1-14, 2004
  5. Bijie H, Kulpradist S, Manalaysay M. In vitro activity, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, safety and pharmacoeconomics of ceftriaxone compared with third and fourth generation cephalosporins. J Chemother 17: 3-24, 2005
  6. Mitrokhin SD. Sulperazone in the treatment of severe infections in patients with cancer. Antibiot Khimioter 48: 26-29, 2003
  7. Beloborodova NV, Kuznetsova ST, Popov DA. Clinical experience with the treatment of severe nosocomial infections by inhibitor-protected 3rd generation cephalosporin cefoperazone/sulbactam. Antibiot Khimioter 50: 33-40, 2005
  8. Wang X, Shi Y, Qin W. Antibacterial activity in vitro and clinical use of sulperazon. Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi 36: 406-410, 1997
  9. Picazo JJ. Management of the Febrile Neutropenic Patient: A Consensus Conference. Clin Infect Dis 15; 39 Suppl 1: S1-6, 2004
  10. No authors listed. Three-year experience with the use of cefoperazone/sulbactam (sulperazone) in the treatment of hospital-acquired infections in an oncologic hospital. Antibiot Khimoter 51: 14-17, 2006
  11. Beketov AS, Sidorenko SV, Pisarev VV. Comparative clinical and epidemiological evaluation of beta-lactam antibiotics in the treatment of intraabdominal infections. Antibiot Khimioter 48: 34-41, 2003
  12. Fujii R, Meguro H, Arimasu O. Bacteriological, pharmacokinetic and clinical studies on sulbactam/ cefoperazone in the pediatric field. Jpn J Antibiot 37: 2427-2456, 1984
  13. Fukuda M, Hirashima K. Clinical evaluation of combination therapy with sulbactam/cefoperazone and amikacin sulfate for infections associated with hematological disorders. Jpn J Antibiot 46: 912-917, 1993
  14. Matsushima T, Tamura K, Okamoto K. Effect of co