Journals / Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi / 2017 / Sayı: 19

FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENTS, EXPORT AND ECONOMIC GROWTH: EVIDENCES FROM SELECTED DEVELOPING COUNTRIES

Pages
197–210
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Firstly, the data sets consisting of annual data in the period of 2000-2014 were subjected to LLC, IPS and Hadri panel unit root tests and it was concluded that the series did not have unit roots in their level values.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to analyze the relationship among foreign direct investments, export and economic growth, and to provide evidence from 44 selected developing countries.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Firstly, the data sets consisting of annual data in the period of 2000-2014 were subjected to LLC, IPS and Hadri panel unit root tests and it was concluded that the series did not have unit roots in their level values.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results obtained, it may be argued that there is a two-way relationship of causality among the variables foreign direct investments, export and economic growth in the developing countries in question.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000-2014 Verileri
⚙️Variables:DYY · GSYİH · İhracat

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the relationship among foreign direct investments, export and economic growth, and to provide evidence from 44 selected developing countries. Firstly, the data sets consisting of annual data in the period of 2000-2014 were subjected to LLC, IPS and Hadri panel unit root tests and it was concluded that the series did not have unit roots in their level values. The causality relationship among the series was determined using the Dumitrescu-Hurlin Causality Test method. According to the results obtained, it may be argued that there is a two-way relationship of causality among the variables foreign direct investments, export and economic growth in the developing countries in question.

Özet

Çalışmanın amacı doğrudan yabancı yatırımlar, ihracat ve ekonomik büyüme arasındaki ilişkiyi analiz etmek; seçilmiş 44 gelişmekte olan ülkeden kanıtlar ortaya koymaktır. Öncelikle, 2000-2014 dönemine ait yıllık verilerden oluşan veri setleri LLC, IPS ve Hadri panel birim kök testlerine tabi tutulmuş ve serilerin düzey değerlerinde birim kök içermedikleri sonucuna ulaşılmıştır. Seriler arasındaki nedensellik ilişki ise Dumitrescu ve Hurlin Panel Nedensellik Testi yöntemiyle tespit edilmiştir. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre, söz konusu gelişmekte olan ülkelerde doğrudan yabancı yatırımlar, ihracat ve ekonomik büyüme değişkenleri arasında çift yönlü nedensellik ilişkisinin varlığından söz edilebilir şeklindedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

SANDALCILAR, A. R., DİLEK, Ö. (2017). FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENTS, EXPORT AND ECONOMIC GROWTH: EVIDENCES FROM SELECTED DEVELOPING COUNTRIES. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, Sayı: 19, 197–210. https://ajindex.com/articles/322653

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Ahmad, J. and Kwan, A. C. (1991). Causality Between Exports And Economic Growth: Empirical Evidence From Africa. Economics Letters, 37 (3), 243-248.
  2. Ahmad, J. and Harnhirun S., (1996). Cointegration and Causality Between Exports and Economic Growth: Evidence from the ASEAN Countries. The Canadian Journal of Economics, 29 (2), 413-416.
  3. Alfaro, L., Chanda, A., Kalemli, S. and Özcan, S. (2004).
  4. FDI and Economic Growth, The Role of Local Financial Markets. Journal of International Economics, 64, 113-134.
  5. Aydemir, C. Arslan İ. and Uncu F. (2012). Development of Foreign Direct Investments: Turkey and the World. Kocaeli University Journal of Social Sciences, 23, 69-104.
  6. Baltagi, Badi H. (2005). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. Third Edition, John Wiley&Sons Ltd., England. Berthelemy, Jean-C., Demurger, S. (2000). Foreign Direct Investment and Economic Growth: Theory and Application to China. Review of Development Economics, 4(2), 140-155.
  7. Bozkurt, H. and Dursun G. (2006). The Interaction Between Investment in Information and Communication Technology and Flows Foreign Direct Investment: Co-Integration Analysis for Turkey, 1980-2004. Journal of Knowledge Economy & Knowledge Management, Vol: I-I, I-II (Special Issue), 37-49.
  8. Campos, Nauro F., and Kinoshita Y. (2002). Foreign Direct Investment as Technology Transferred: Some Panel Evidence from the Transition Countries. The Manchester School, 70 (3), 398-419.
  9. Cengiz A. (2009).
  10. Causality Analysis between Exports, Imports and Economic Growth of Turkey’’ Kocaeli University Journal of Social Sciences, 18 (2), 35–47.
  11. Choe, J. I. (2003). Do Foreign Direct Investment and Gross Domestic Investment Promote Economic Growth?. Review of Development Economics, 7(1), 44-57.
  12. Choong, C.K., A.Z. Baharumshah, Z. Yusop and M.S. Habibullah (2010).
  13. Private Capital Flows, Stock Markets and Economic Growth in Developed and Developing Countries: A Comparative Analysis. Japan and the World Economy, 22, 107‐117. Chowdhury, A.and G. Mavrotas (2005). FDI and Growth: A Causal Relationship. United Nation University, WİDER, Research Paper No: 2005/25. Değer, K. (2006). Tourism and Export Oriented Growth:1980-2005 Turkey Experiment. Atatürk University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 20 (2), 67-86.
  14. Dumitrescu, E. I. and Hurlin, C., (2012). Testing for Granger Noncausality in Heterogeneous Panels. Economic Modelling, 29(4), 1450-1460.
  15. Dunning, J.H. (1994). “Re-evaluating The Benefits Offoreign Direct Investment”, Transnational Co