Journals / Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi / 2018 / Sayı: 20

ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY ANALYSIS OF TOURISM POTENTIAL OF OECD COUNTRIES: AN EMPRICAL STUDY WITH DEA

ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY ANALYSIS OF TOURISM SECTOR IN OECD COUNTRIES: AN EMPRICAL STUDY WITH DEA

Pages
83–100
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As a result of a dynamic analysis, eight countries (USA, Australia, Spain, Luxembourg, Portugal, Turkey, New Zealand and Greece) were observed to be efficient DMUs according to both the CCR and BCC models.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study we aim to analyze the efficiency of tourism potential of OECD countries in terms of economics perspective with the data of 2011-2015 years.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Number of arrivals (NoA), tourism expenditures (TE) and logistic performance index (LPI) were used as input variables; while tourism revenues (TR) as output variables in accordance with the data acquired from World Bank (WB).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As a result of a dynamic analysis, eight countries (USA, Australia, Spain, Luxembourg, Portugal, Turkey, New Zealand and Greece) were observed to be efficient DMUs according to both the CCR and BCC models.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2011-2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Turizm · Ekonomik Etkinlik Analizi · Veri Zarflama Analizi (VZA)

Abstract

In this study we aim to analyze the efficiency of tourism potential of OECD countries in terms of economics perspective with the data of 2011-2015 years. Number of arrivals (NoA), tourism expenditures (TE) and logistic performance index (LPI) were used as input variables; while tourism revenues (TR) as output variables in accordance with the data acquired from World Bank (WB). Both statical and dynamic DEA were conducted with output oriented models. Considering the results of both the CCR ad BCC models as a whole; USA, Australia, Spain, Luxembourg, Portugal, Turkey and New Zealand were efficient countries in all years. Taking into account the required improvements of the variables of the inefficient countries, it is possible to say that tourism expenditure of the inefficient countries should be decreased approximately 2%. Moreover, it could be put forwarded that tourism revenues should be increased approximately 92%. As a result of a dynamic analysis, eight countries (USA, Australia, Spain, Luxembourg, Portugal, Turkey, New Zealand and Greece) were observed to be efficient DMUs according to both the CCR and BCC models.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, 2011-2015 yıllarına ait verilerle OECD ülkelerinin turizm etkinliğinin iktisadi analizi yapılmaya çalışılmıştır. Çalışmada, girdi değişkeni olarak gelen yolcu sayısı, turizm harcamaları, lojistik performans endeksi; çıktı değişkeni olarak da turizm gelirleri olmak üzere toplam dört değişken kullanılmıştır. Veriler, Dünya Bankası veri tabanından elde edilmiştir. Analiz yöntemi olarak, statik ve dinamik Veri Zarflama Analizi (VZA)’nin çıktıya yönelik modelleri kullanılmıştır. Analiz neticesinde; ABD, Avustralya, İspanya, Lüksemburg, Portekiz, Türkiye ve Yeni Zelanda’nın hem CCR hem de BCC çıktı yönelimli model sonucunda tüm yıllarda etkin ülkeler olduğu gözlenmiştir. Etkin olmayan ülkelerin değişkenler bazında yapmaları gereken iyileştirme değerleri incelendiğinde; turizm harcamalarının yaklaşık %2 azaltılması ve turizm gelirlerinin de yaklaşık %92 artırılması gerektiği ortaya çıkmıştır. Beş yıllık verilerin topluca değerlendirildiği dinamik analiz sonucunda CCR ve BCC çıktı yönelimli modele göre ABD, Avustralya, İspanya, Lüksemburg, Portekiz, Türkiye, Yeni Zelanda ve Yunanistan’ın etkin ülkeler olduğu gözlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

BAYRAK, R., BAHAR, O. (2018). ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY ANALYSIS OF TOURISM POTENTIAL OF OECD COUNTRIES: AN EMPRICAL STUDY WITH DEA. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, Sayı: 20, 83–100. https://ajindex.com/articles/322647

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Akal, Z. (2002). Performance Measurement and Control in Business: Multifaceted Performance Indicators, Ankara:
  2. MPM Publication. Aktaş, H. (2001). DEA Analysis Approach to Performance Appraisal in Business, Journal of Management and Economics of Celal Bayar University, 7 (1), 163-175.
  3. Aksu, A.A. & Köksal, C.D. (2005). Comparisons of the Efficiency of the Independent Hotel Chains with DEA: An Emprical Study in Antalya, Journal of Economics, Business and Finance, 20(235), 97-107.
  4. Atan, M. & Arslantürk, Y. (2015). Efficiency of Tourism Potential of Countries, Gazi Journal of Economics and Business, 1(1), 59-76.
  5. Babacan, A. & Özcan, S. (2009). Research of Alanya Region Hotels’ Relative Efficiency: An Application of Data Envelopment Analysis Technique, Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 6(12), 176-189.
  6. Bahar, O. & Kozak, M. (2008). Tourism Economics Concepts and Practices, USA: Nova Publishing. Bakırcı, F. (2006). Efficiency in Production and Measuring Productivity: Theory and Application of Data Envelopment Analysis, Ankara:
  7. Atlas Publication. Banker, R.D., Charnes, A. & Cooper, W.W. (1984). Some Models For Estimating Technical and Scale Efficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis, Management Sciences, 30(9), 1078-1092.
  8. Bayrak, R. (2015).
  9. Efficiency Analysis with DEA, Canakkale Onsekiz Mart Journal of Entrepreneurship and Development, 10(2), 26-51.
  10. Bozkurt, Ö. & Ergun, T. (1998).
  11. Public Administration Glossary, Ankara:
  12. TODAI. Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W. & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring The Effıciency of Decision Making Units, European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429-444.
  13. Cooper, W., Lawrence, W., Seiford, L.,M. & Tone, K. (2000). Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text With Models, Applications, References and DEA Solver Software, USA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  14. Coelli, T.J., Rao, D.S.P., O’Donnell, T.J. & Battese, G.E. (2005). An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis, USA: Springer. Cooper, W.W., Seiford, L.M. & Zhu, J. (2011). Handbook on Data Envelopment Analysis, USA: Springer. Copeland, B.R. (1991).
  15. Tourism, Welfare and De-Industrialization in a Small Open Economy, Economica, 58 (232), 515-529.
  16. Dinçer, M.Z. (1993). Tousrism Economics and Tourism in Turkish Economics, İstanbul:
  17. Filiz Publication. Efil, İ. (2006). Management and Organization in Business, İstanbul:
  18. Alfa Aktüel. Emir, O., Pelit, E., & Günay, F. (2010). Problems of Hotel Managements with Point of View of Employees Who are Graduates: An A