Journals / Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi / 2019 / Sayı: 23

ANALYZING TWITTER DATA OF FIRMS WITH SOCIAL MEDIA MINING

SOSYAL MEDYA MADENCİLİĞİ İLE FİRMALARIN TWITTER VERİLERİNİN İNCELENMESİ

Pages
237–256
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Since the majority of the interactions obtained by the firms came from the minority of the feeds, which cluster received more interaction was analyzed with the help of the Pareto Principle.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to determine whether Twitter data of the firms has a significant correspondence with respect to the firms, to cluster Twitter feeds of the firms and to find out which cluster has the maximum interaction through analyzing the Twitter data of the rival firms operating in different sectors.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this context, Twitter data shared by competitors operating in the cosmetics, electronics and marketplace sectors during 2017 were analyzed by following the process of Social Media Mining.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Since the majority of the interactions obtained by the firms came from the minority of the feeds, which cluster received more interaction was analyzed with the help of the Pareto Principle.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:sosyal medya · sosyal medya madenciliği · metin madenciliği

Abstract

This study aims to determine whether Twitter data of the firms has a significant correspondence with respect to the firms, to cluster Twitter feeds of the firms and to find out which cluster has the maximum interaction through analyzing the Twitter data of the rival firms operating in different sectors. In this context, Twitter data shared by competitors operating in the cosmetics, electronics and marketplace sectors during 2017 were analyzed by following the process of Social Media Mining. The significant correspondence of Twitter variables of the firms was determined by the Correspondence Analysis. Twitter feeds of the firms were clustered with categories “Special Offer”, “Competition & Event”, “Product”, “Social”, “Support & Feedback” and “Special Interaction” by using a number of Text Mining pre-processing methods. Since the majority of the interactions obtained by the firms came from the minority of the feeds, which cluster received more interaction was analyzed with the help of the Pareto Principle.

Özet

Bu çalışma, farklı sektörlerde faaliyet gösteren rakip firmaların Twitter verilerini analiz ederek, firmaların Twitter verilerinin firmalara göre anlamlı bir uyum gösterip göstermediğinin tespit edilmesini, firmaların Twitter’da paylaştıkları içeriklerin kümelenmesini ve hangi içerik kümesinin en fazla etkileşime yol açtığının belirlenmesini amaçlamaktadır. Bu kapsamda, 2017 yılı boyunca kozmetik, elektronik ve pazaryeri sektörlerinde faaliyet gösteren rakip firmalar tarafından paylaşılan Twitter verileri, Sosyal Medya Madenciliği süreci izlenerek analiz edilmiştir. Firmaların Twitter verilerinin firmalara göre anlamlı bir uyum gösterip göstermediği Uygunluk Analizi ile tespit edilmiştir. Firmaların Twitter paylaşımları ise Metin Madenciliği ön işleme metotlarından faydalanılarak “Özel Teklif”, “Yarışma & Etkinlik”, “Ürün”, “Sosyal”, “Destek & Geri Bildirim” ve “Özel Etkileşim” kategori başlıklarıyla kümelenmiştir. Firmaların elde ettikleri etkileşimlerin büyük bir çoğunluğunun azınlıktaki paylaşımlardan gelmesi sebebi ile hangi içerik kümesinin en fazla etkileşime yol açtığı Pareto İlkesi yardımı ile belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

AYAN, B., CAN, M., GÜRSOY, U. T. (2019). ANALYZING TWITTER DATA OF FIRMS WITH SOCIAL MEDIA MINING. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, Sayı: 23, 237–256. https://ajindex.com/articles/321964

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. af Rosenborg, K., Christina, D., Buhl-Andersen, I., Nilsson, L. B., Rebild, M. P., Mukkamala, R. R.,. & Vatrapu, R. (2017). Buzz vs. sales: Big social data analytics of style icon campaigns and fashion designer collaborations on h&m’s facebook page. Asur, S., & Huberman, B. A. (2010, August). Predicting the future with social media. In Proceedings of the 2010 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology-Volume 01 (pp. 492-499).
  2. IEEE Computer Society. Bian, J., Yoshigoe, K., Hicks, A., Yuan, J., He, Z., Xie, M.,. & Modave, F. (2016). Mining twitter to Assess the public perception of the “Internet of Things”. PloS one, 11(7), e0158450. Bollen, J., Mao, H., & Zeng, X. (2011). Twitter mood predicts the stock market. Journal of computational science, 2(1), 1-8.
  3. Bonzanini, M. (2016). Mastering social media mining with Python. Packt Publishing Ltd. Chae, B. K. (2015). Insights from hashtag# supplychain and Twitter Analytics: Considering Twitter and Twitter data for supply chain practice and research. International Journal of Production Economics, 165, 247-259.
  4. Chatfield, A., & Brajawidagda, U. (2012). Twitter tsunami early warning network: a social network analysis of Twitter information flows. Çoban, Ö., Özyer, B., & Özyer, G. T. (2015, May). Sentiment analysis for Turkish Twitter feeds. In Signal Processing and Communications Applications Conference (SIU), 2015 23th (pp. 2388-2391).
  5. IEEE. Ding, C., Cheng, H. K., Duan, Y., & Jin, Y. (2017). The power of the “like” button: The impact of social media on box office. Decision Support Systems, 94, 77-84.
  6. Guidry, J. D., Messner, M., Jin, Y., & Medina-Messner, V. (2015). From# mcdonaldsfail to# dominossucks: An analysis of Instagram images about the 10 largest fast food companies. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 20(3), 344-359.
  7. Han, J., Pei, J., & Kamber, M. (2011). Data mining: concepts and techniques. Elsevier. Ishikawa, H. (2015). Social big data mining. CRC Press.
  8. Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business horizons, 53(1), 59-68.
  9. Ki, E. J., & Nekmat, E. (2014). Situational crisis communication and interactivity: Usage and effectiveness of Facebook for crisis management by Fortune 500 companies. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 140-147.
  10. Kuflik, T., Minkov, E., Nocera, S., Grant-Muller, S., Gal-Tzur, A., & Shoor, I. (2017). Automating a framework to extract and analy