Journals / Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi / 2019 / Sayı: 22

VALIDITY OF THIRLWALL’S LAW FOR BRIC-T COUNTRIES: PANEL DATA ANALY-SIS

EXAMINATION OF THIRLWALL’S LAW FOR BRIC-T COUNTRIES

Pages
51–64
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results, Thirlwall’s Law is not valid for BRIC-T economies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:According to the Thirlwall’s Law, the main factor which restricts the economic growth in an open economy is the balance of payments.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The aim of this study is to investigate the validity of the Thirlwall Law for BRIC-T (Brazil, Russi India, China, Turkey) countries for the period between 2000 and 2015.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results, Thirlwall’s Law is not valid for BRIC-T economies.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2000 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Thirwall Kanunu · Panel Birim Kök Testi · Thirwall Law

Abstract

According to the Thirlwall’s Law, the main factor which restricts the economic growth in an open economy is the balance of payments. The aim of this study is to investigate the validity of the Thirlwall Law for BRIC-T (Brazil, Russi India, China, Turkey) countries for the period between 2000 and 2015. Panel data analysis has been used in the empirical part of the study. Heterogeneity (vice versa) and cross-sectional dependency of the variables are examined with some preliminary tests. Respectively, Delta test and CDlm test have been applied. After proving the stability of the variables with second generation panel unit root tests, the long-term cointegration relationship is estimated by Westerlund Durbin-H test. According to the results, Thirlwall’s Law is not valid for BRIC-T economies.

Özet

Thirwall Kanunu’na göre dışa açık bir ekonomide büyüme oranını kısıtlayan ana faktör ödemeler dengesi bilançosudur. Bu çalışmadaki amaç, Thirwall Kanunu’nun 2000-2015 yıllarını kapsayan bir dönemde geçerliliğin BRIC-T (Brezilya, Rusya, Hindistan, Çin, Türkiye) ülkeleri için sınanmasıdır. Çalışmanın ampirik kısmında panel veri analizi yapılmıştır. Değişkenlerin yatay-kesit bağımlılığı içerip içermediği ya da heterojen olup olmadıkları; Delta ve CDlm gibi ön testler ile test edilmiştir. Serilerin durağanlığı ikinci kuşak birim kök testleri ile ispat edildikten sonra uzun dönem nedensellik ilişkisi Westerund Durbin-H testi ile tahmin edilmiştir. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre, Thirwall Kanunu BRIC-T ekonomilerinde geçerli değildir.

🔖

Cite This Article

SÖNMEZ, F. E., SAĞLAM, Y. (2019). VALIDITY OF THIRLWALL’S LAW FOR BRIC-T COUNTRIES: PANEL DATA ANALY-SIS. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, Sayı: 22, 51–64. https://ajindex.com/articles/321951

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General Diagnostic Tests for Cross Section Dependence in Panels, Working Paper No:0435, University of Cambridge. Pesaran, M. H. (2007). A Simple Panel Unit Root Test in The Presence Of Cross-Section Dependence, Journal of Applied Economics, 22, 265-312.
  2. Thirlwall, P. A. and Hussain, M. N. (1982).
  3. The Balance of Payments Constraint, Capital Flows and Growth Rate Differences Between Developing Countries, Oxford Economic Papers, 34(3), 498-510.