Journals / Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi / 2020 / Sayı: 0

DETERMINING THE APPROPRIATE OPEN INNOVATION MODEL FOR LOGISTICS FIRMS USING AN INTEGRATED FUZZY AHP-VIKOR APPROACH

Pages
135–148
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The most important three criteria in order to determine the appropriate open innovation model are innovation process, motivation, and market respectively.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Open innovation includes making collaborative relationships with other firms and institutions to achieve competitive advantage through innovative products or services.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Open innovation has an effect the logistics firms because they have many services and products and also various relationships with their shareholders.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The most important three criteria in order to determine the appropriate open innovation model are innovation process, motivation, and market respectively.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Lojistik · Açık Yenilik · Bulanık AHP VIKOR

Abstract

Open innovation includes making collaborative relationships with other firms and institutions to achieve competitive advantage through innovative products or services. Open innovation has an effect the logistics firms because they have many services and products and also various relationships with their shareholders. The main purpose of this study is to determine the appropriate open innovation model for logistics firms. In this context, the application process is performed by a Fuzzy Multi Criteria Decision Making model. This approach involves both criteria (control, focus, innovation process, knowledge, cost, capacity, market, utilization, policy, motivation) and alternatives (inbound, outbound and coupled open innovation models). Weights of the criteria were determined by Fuzzy AHP. Furthermore, ranks the alternatives were performed by Fuzzy VIKOR. According to results, outbound innovationis determined as the appropriate open innovation model for logistics firms. The most important three criteria in order to determine the appropriate open innovation model are innovation process, motivation, and market respectively.

Özet

Açık yenilik, yenilikçiürün ve hizmetler yoluyla rekabet avantajı elde edebilmek için diğer firma ve kuruluşlarla iş birliğine dayalı ilişkiler kurmayı içermektedir. Çok sayıda ürün ve hizmete sahip ve paydaşları ile yoğun ilişkileri olan kuruluşlar olması nedeniyle lojistik firmaları, açık yenilikten etkilenmektedir. Çalışmanın amacı, lojistik firmaları için en uygun açık yenilik modelinin belirlenmesidir. Bu doğrultuda uygulama aşaması, bir Bulanık Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Modeli aaracılığıyla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bu yaklaşım, kriterler (kontrol, odak, yenilik süreci, bilgi, maliyet, kapasite, pazar, kullanım, politika, motivasyon) ve alternatifleri (gelen, giden ve çift yönlü açık yenilik modelleri) içermektedir. Kriter ağırlıkları, Bulanık AHP yöntemiyle belirlenmiştir. Alternatiflerin sıralanması ise Bulanık VIKOR yöntemi aracılığıyla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Sonuçlara göre; giden yenilik,lojistik firmaları açısından en uygun açık yenilik modeli olarak tespit edilmiştir. En uygun açık yenilik türünün seçiminde en önemli üç kriter ise sırasıyla; yenilik süreci, motivasyon ve pazar olarak belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

AR, İ. M., PEKER, İ., BAKİ, B. (2020). DETERMINING THE APPROPRIATE OPEN INNOVATION MODEL FOR LOGISTICS FIRMS USING AN INTEGRATED FUZZY AHP-VIKOR APPROACH. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, Sayı: 0, 135–148. https://ajindex.com/articles/321938

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Andersson, P., and Forslund, H. (2018). Developing an Indicator Framework for Measuring Sustainable Logistics Innovation in Retail. Measuring Business Excellence, 22(1), 1-13.
  2. Battistella, B., De Toni, A.F., and Pessot, E. (2017). Practising Open Innovation: A Framework of Reference. Business Process Management Journal, 23(6), 1311-1336.
  3. Björklund, M., and Forslund, H. (2018). Exploring the Sustainable Logistics Innovation Process. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 118(1), 204-217.
  4. Bianchi, M., Cavaliere, A., Chiaroni, D., Frattini, F., and Chiesa, V. (2011). Organisational Modes for Open Innovation in the Bio-pharmaceutical Industry: An Exploratory Analysis. Technovation, 31(1), 22-33.
  5. Bigliardi, B., Dormio, A.I., and Galati, F. (2012). The Adoption of Open Innovation within the Telecommunication Industry. European Journal of Innovation Management, 15(1), 27-54.
  6. Bogers, M. (2011). The Open Innovation Paradox: Knowledge Sharing and Protection in R&D Collaborations. European Journal of Innovation Management, 14(1), 93-117.
  7. Buckley, J.J. (1985). Fuzzy Hierarchical Analysis. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 17, 233-247.
  8. Burcharth, A., Knudsen, M.P., and Søndergaard, H.A. (2017). The Role of Employee Autonomy for Open Innovation Performance. Business Process Management Journal, 23(6), 1245-1269.
  9. Busse, C., and Wallenburg, C.M. (2011). Innovation Management of Logistics Service Providers: Foundations, Review, and Research Agenda. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 41(2), 187-218.
  10. Busse, C. (2010). A Procedure for Secondary Data Analysis: Innovation by Logistics Service Providers. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 46(4), 44-58.
  11. Canık, Y., Bohemia, E., and Telalbasic, I. (2017). Mapping Coupled Open Innovation Processes from Activity Heory Framework. Design Management Academy Conference 2017. Retrived from https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/dspace-jspui/bitstream/2134/24922/1/75.pdf (available at 14/08/2018)
  12. Casprini, E., De Massis, A., Di Minin, A., Frattini, F., and Piccaluga, A. (2017). How Family Firms Execute Open Innovation Strategies: The Loccioni case. Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(6), 1459-1485.
  13. Chang, D.Y. (1996). Applications of the Extent Analysis Method on Fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 95, 649-655.
  14. Chapman, R.L., Soosay, C., and Kandampully, J. (2003). Innovation in Logistic Services and the New Business Model. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 33(7), 630-650.