Journals / Uzmanlık Sonrası Eğitim ve Güncel Gelişmeler Dergisi / 2007 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2

Laparoscopic sacro-servicopexy procedure for uterovaginal prolapse in woman wishing uterine preservation

Uterusunun korunmasını isteyen uterovajinal prolapsuslu kadınlarda laparoskopik sakroservikopeksi yöntemi

Pages
148–151
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We feel that laparoscopic sacro-cervicopexy is a good alternative in patients with pelvic prolapse who desire to retain their fertility since it avoids the need for a laparotomy and does not disturb the cervical anatomy.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Though pelvic organ prolapse is usually encountered during climacteric and postmenopausal years, it may sometimes be seen in young woman who desire to retain their fertility.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The mean operation time is 89 (80-100) minutes.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We feel that laparoscopic sacro-cervicopexy is a good alternative in patients with pelvic prolapse who desire to retain their fertility since it avoids the need for a laparotomy and does not disturb the cervical anatomy.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Tekrarlama · Kadın doğum cerrahi işlemleri · Uterus prolapsı

Abstract

Though pelvic organ prolapse is usually encountered during climacteric and postmenopausal years, it may sometimes be seen in young woman who desire to retain their fertility. In addition to conventional transvaginal and tranabdominal approaches, laparoscopic procedures are now widely being used in pelvic floor surgery. We presented six patients with symptomatic uterovaginal prolapse managed with laparoscopic sacro-cervicopexy. The mean operation time is 89 (80-100) minutes. All these patients were discharged from hospital in the first postoperative day and the blood loss was lower than 100 ml in all patients. The complication did not occur in all patients and no objective evidence of recurrent genital prolapse was found in all patients with follow up of 6- 44 months. Two years after this operation in a patient whom delivered with sectio, no objective evidence of recurrent genital prolapse was found in a patient with follow up of 28 months after than sectio. We feel that laparoscopic sacro-cervicopexy is a good alternative in patients with pelvic prolapse who desire to retain their fertility since it avoids the need for a laparotomy and does not disturb the cervical anatomy.

Özet

Pelvik organ prolapsusus, genellikle postmenopozal yıllarda veya klimakterik dönemde oluşsa da, fertilitesinin devamını arzu eden genç kadınlarda da bazen gözlenebilir. Pelvik taban cerrahisinde geleneksel transvajinal ve transabdominal yaklaşımlara ek olarak, laparoskopik yöntemler günümüzde yaygın olarak kullanılmaktadır. Çalışmamızda, semptomatik uterovajinal prolapsusu nedeniyle laparoskopik sakroservikopeksi uyguladığımız 6 hasta ile ilgili operasyon tekniği ve sonuçları değerlendirdik. Ortalama operasyon süresi 89 (80-100) dakika idi. Tüm hastalar postoperatif birinci gün taburcu edildi ve ortalama kan kaybı tüm hastalarda 100 ml'den az bulundu. Hiçbir hastada intra- ve post-operatif komplikasyon gelişmedi ve 6-44 ay arası takipte rekürrens izlenmemiştir. Operasyondan 2 yıl sonra miadında sezeryan ile doğum yapan bir hastada, doğumdan sonra geçen 28 ay takipte rekkürens saptanmamıştır. Laparoskopik sakroservikopeksi, fertilitesinin devamını isteyen uterovajinal prolapsusu olan hastalarda laparotomiye alternatif iyi bir yöntemdir ve servikal anatomiye zarar vermemektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞENDAĞ, F., AKMAN, L., ÖZTEKİN, K., BİLGİN, O. (2007). Laparoscopic sacro-servicopexy procedure for uterovaginal prolapse in woman wishing uterine preservation. Uzmanlık Sonrası Eğitim ve Güncel Gelişmeler Dergisi, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 2, 148–151. https://ajindex.com/articles/320562

References (1)

  1. Thomas AG, Bromdan ML, Dottino PR, Bodian C, Friedman F Jr, Bogursky E. Manchester procedure vs vaginal hysterectomy for uterin prolapse.Reprod Med 1995:40;299-304 2. Cruikshank SH, Cox IN. Sacrospinosus fixation at the time of vaginal hysterectomy. Am j Obstet Gynecol 1991;164:1072-1076. 3. Costantini E, Lombi R, MicheliC,Parziani S, Porena M. Colposacropexy with Gore-Tex mesh in marked vaginal and uterovaginal prolapse. Eur Urol 1998;34:111-117 4. Baden WF, TR. Genesis of the vaginal profile: a correlated classification of vaginal relaxation. Clin Obstet Gynecol 1972; 15:1048-1054. 5. Wilcox LS, Koonin LM, Pokras R, Strauss RT, Xia Z, Peterson HB. Hysterectomy in the Unitet States,1988-1990.Obstet Gynecol 1994;83:549-555. 6. Masters WH, Jhonson V.Human sexual response. Boston,Little Brown,1966. 7. Barrington JW, Bowen Simpkins P.The Levonorgestrel intrauterin system in the management of menorrhagia. Br J 0bstet Gynecol 1997;104:614-616. 8. O'Leary JL. The extended Manchester operation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1970;107:546-550. 9. Williams BFP. Surgical treatment in uterin prolapse in young women Am J Obstet Gynecol 1966;95:967-972. 10. Naye y Sanchez RM, Velasco VR, Garcia TL. Manchester operation:late complications and obstetric future. Obstet Gynecol Mex 1973;33:457-459. 11. Kovac SR, Cruikshank SH.Succesful pregnancies and vaginal deliveries after sacrospinosus uterosacral fixation in five of nineteen patients. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;168:1778-1786. 12. Carey MP, Slack MC. Transvaginal sacrospinous colpopexy for vault and marked uterovaginal prolapse. Br J Obstet Gynecol 1994;101:536-540. 13. Richardson DA, Scotti RJ, Ostergard DR. Surgical management of uterine prolapse in young women. J Reprod Med 1989; 536:540. 14. Maher CF, Cary MP, Slack MP, Murray CJ, Milligan M, Schuluter P. Uterin preservation or hysterectomy at sacrospinous colpopexy for utero vaginal prolapse? Int Urogynecol J 2001;12:381-385. 15. Shalev E. Butsan M, Peleg D. Laparoscopic ventrosuspension or ventrofixation- alternative treatment aproaches for uterine prolapse. Gynecol Endosc 1994;3-17. 16. O'Brien PMS, Ibrahim J. F ailure of laparoscopic uterine suspension to provide a lasting cure for uterovaginal prolapse.Br J Obstet Gynecol 1994;101-707. 17. Escamilla JO. Uterine suspension.Am J Obstet Gynecol 1998; 178:194-195. 18. Cornier E, Madelenat P. The Kapandji hysteropexy:a laparoscopic tecnique and Preliminary results. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod 1994;23:378-385. 19. Maher CF,