Journals / RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2019 / Sayı: 0

A woman taking up the pen: Anna Weamys and A Continuation of Sir Philip Sidney’s Arcadia

Kaleme sarılan bir kadın: Anna Weamys ve A Continuation of Sir Philip Sidney’s Arcadia

Pages
276–289
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Within this framework, taking into consideration the question “Is a pen a metaphorical penis?” Sandra Gilbert and Susan Gubar pose, and the cultural understanding of romance and women’s preoccupation with the genre in the seventeenth century, this paper examines how Weamys shatters the hegemony of Sidney in A Continuation of Sir Philip Sidney’s Arcadia (1651) in order to establish her literary authority as a female author.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:A popular romance by a popular courtier, Sir Philip Sidney’s Arcadia was the best-selling prose fiction of the 1590s England.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The product of an arduous work, it broke off mid-sentence due to Sidney’s untimely death in 1586.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Within this framework, taking into consideration the question “Is a pen a metaphorical penis?” Sandra Gilbert and Susan Gubar pose, and the cultural understanding of romance and women’s preoccupation with the genre in the seventeenth century, this paper examines how Weamys shatters the hegemony of Sidney in A Continuation of Sir Philip Sidney’s Arcadia (1651) in order to establish her literary authority as a female author.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Anna Weamys · Sir Philip Sidney · romance

Abstract

A popular romance by a popular courtier, Sir Philip Sidney’s Arcadia was the best-selling prose fiction of the 1590s England. Sidney wrote the Old Arcadia, which consisted of five books, earlier than the New Arcadia. In the New Arcadia, a revision of the Old Arcadia, which was composed of three books, he followed the original plotline while he also added new episodes and reshaped some narratives. The product of an arduous work, it broke off mid-sentence due to Sidney’s untimely death in 1586. This incomplete text was published in 1590. In the posthumously published 1593 Arcadia, a merger of the Old Arcadia and the New Arcadia, Sidney invited the reader to continue his text (the original ending of the older version). Even though he used the male personal pronoun to address his successors, Anna Weamys was the only woman to take up the challenge. Writing at a time when female romance reading and writing were frowned upon by the patriarchal culture and authorship was predominantly considered to be a male activity, Weamys not only interpreted the narrative threads Sidney left unfinished from a female point of view but she also produced her own independent work. Within this framework, taking into consideration the question “Is a pen a metaphorical penis?” Sandra Gilbert and Susan Gubar pose, and the cultural understanding of romance and women’s preoccupation with the genre in the seventeenth century, this paper examines how Weamys shatters the hegemony of Sidney in A Continuation of Sir Philip Sidney’s Arcadia (1651) in order to establish her literary authority as a female author.

Özet

A popular romance by a popular courtier, Sir Philip Sidney’s Arcadia was the best-selling prose fiction of the 1590s England. Sidney wrote the Old Arcadia, which consisted of five books, earlier than the New Arcadia. In the New Arcadia, a revision of the Old Arcadia, which was composed of three books, he followed the original plotline while he also added new episodes and reshaped some narratives. The product of an arduous work, it broke off mid-sentence due to Sidney’s untimely death in 1586. This incomplete text was published in 1590. In the posthumously published 1593 Arcadia, a merger of the Old Arcadia and the New Arcadia, Sidney invited the reader to continue his text (the original ending of the older version). Even though he used the male personal pronoun to address his successors, Anna Weamys was the only woman to take up the challenge. Writing at a time when female romance reading and writing were frowned upon by the patriarchal culture and authorship was predominantly considered to be a male activity, Weamys not only interpreted the narrative threads Sidney left unfinished from a female point of view but she also produced her own independent work. Within this framework, taking into consideration the question “Is a pen a metaphorical penis?” Sandra Gilbert and Susan Gubar pose, and the cultural understanding of romance and women’s preoccupation with the genre in the seventeenth century, this paper examines how Weamys shatters the hegemony of Sidney in A Continuation of Sir Philip Sidney’s Arcadia (1651) in order to establish her literary authority as a female author.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇELİK, M. A. (2019). A woman taking up the pen: Anna Weamys and A Continuation of Sir Philip Sidney’s Arcadia. RumeliDE Dil ve Edebiyat Araştırmaları Dergisi, Sayı: 0, 276–289. https://ajindex.com/articles/319842

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Alighieri, D. (2009). The Divine Comedy of Dante Alighieri. Inferno. (S. Lombardo, Trans.) Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing. Ascham, R. (1870). The Schoolmaster. [Google Books Version]. Retrieved from https://books.google.com.tr/books?id=i45TAAAAcAAJ&printsec=frontcover&hl=tr&source=gbs_ge_summary_r&cad=0#v=onepage&q&f=false
  2. Aughterson, K. (1995). (Ed.). Renaissance woman: a sourcebook. London and New York: Routledge. Beer, G. (1970). The romance. London: Mathuen. Boro, J. (2009). John Fletcher’s Women pleased and the pedagogy of reading romance. In M. E. Lamb & V. Wayne (Eds.), Staging early modern romance: prose fiction, dramatic romance and Shakespeare (pp. 188-202). New York: Routledge. Campbell, J. (2006). Literary circles and gender in early modern Europe. a cross-cultural approach. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing. Garrett, M. (Ed.). (1996). Sidney: The critical heritage. London and New York: Routledge. Cullen, P. C. (1994). (Ed.). Introduction. A continuation of Sir Philip Sidney’s Arcadia (pp. xvii-lxxiii). New York: Oxford University Press.
  3. Davenport, T. (2004). Medieval narrative: an introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  4. DeZur, K. (2014). Gender, interpretation, and political rule in Sidney’s Arcadia. Newark: University of Delaware Press.
  5. Dorrego, J. F. (2002). Wroth and Weamys: two different approaches to pastoral romance, love, and gender. Sederi 11, 67-73. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/19685903/Jorge_Figueroa_Dorrego_Wroth_and_Weamys_Two_Different_Approaches_to_Pastoral_Romance_Love_and_Gender_
  6. Ferguson, M.W. (1996). Renaissance concepts of the women writer. In H. Wilcox (Ed.), Women and literature in Britain, 1500-1700 (pp. 143-168). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  7. Gilbert, S. M., & Gubar, S. (1984). The madwoman in the attic: the woman writer and the nineteenth-Century literary imagination (2nd ed.). New Haven: Yale University Press.
  8. Hackett, H. (2000). Women and romance fiction in the English Renaissance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  9. Hadfield, A. (2010). Prose fiction. In M. Hattaway (Ed.), A new companion to English Renaissance literature and culture (vol. 2, pp. 423-436). Malden: Blackwell. Hager, A. (Ed.). (2005). Encyclopedia of British writers 16th and 17th centuries. New York: Facts on File. Hobby, E. (1988). Virtue of necessity: English women’s writing 1649-88. London: Virago. Keenan, S. (2008). Renaissance literature. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  10. Kinney, C.R. (2009). Undoing romance: Beaum