Journals / Tavukçuluk Araştırma Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1

Pakistan’da Sıcak İklim Koşullarında Farklı Yerleşim Sıklığında Yetiştirilen Hubbord Irkı Etlik Piliçlerde Üretim Performansı

Production Performance of Hubbard Broilers with Different Stocking Densities under Hot Climatic Conditions of Pakistan

Pages
1–4
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, the birds those were highly stocked showed more mortality apparently

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The experiment was conducted to investigate the effect of four stocking densities on the production performance i.e. weight gain, feed consumption, feed conversion ratio (FCR) and mortality of Hubbard broilers chicks under hot climate.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The ambient temperature 35ºC to 45ºC caused the increase in actual experimental house temperature irrespective of set point house temperature, as naturally ventilated open sided house with extraction fans was used for the experiment.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, the birds those were highly stocked showed more mortality apparently
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The experiment was conducted to investigate the effect of four stocking densities on the production performance i.e. weight gain, feed consumption, feed conversion ratio (FCR) and mortality of Hubbard broilers chicks under hot climate. The ambient temperature 35ºC to 45ºC caused the increase in actual experimental house temperature irrespective of set point house temperature, as naturally ventilated open sided house with extraction fans was used for the experiment. Four of the stocking density treatments; 10 birds/m², 12 birds/m², 9 birds/m² and 8 birds/m² were provided to the four groups A, B, C and D, respectively. The experiment was conducted for 2 to 6 week of age of the birds (7 days adaptation period and 35 days experimental period). Water and feed were provided ad libitum. Twentythree hours light was provided. Weight gain per bird (2-6 weeks) of groups A, B, C and D was recorded as 1851.337, 1823.556, 1745.777 and 1834.663g, respectively. The average feed consumption per bird (2-6 weeks) was 3987.333, 4098.667, 4081.333 and 4123.667g for the groups A, B, C and D, respectively. Feed conversion ratio (FCR) per the bird (2-6 weeks) was 2.154, 2.248, 2.338 and 2.248 for the group A, B, C and D, respectively. Mortality for the four groups A, B, C and D was recorded as 6.667, 10.000, 3.333 and 0.000 percent, respectively. When the data calculated for weight gain, feed intake, FCR and mortality was analyzed statistically, the difference between the groups of four stocking density was found to be non-significant. However, the birds those were highly stocked showed more mortality apparently

Özet

Bu çalışmada sıcak iklim koşullarında, Hubbord ırkı etlik piliçlerde dört farklı yerleşim sıklığının üretim performansı (canlı ağırlık artışı, yem tüketimi, yemden yararlanma oranı ve ölüm oranı) üzerine etkileri araştırılmıştır. Çalışmada yanları açık, doğal olarak havalandırılan ve fanlarla hava çıkışının sağlandığı kümeste, 35ºC - 45ºC olan çevre sıcaklığı; kümes içi sıcaklığın stres oluşturabilecek düzeylere kadar artışına neden olmuştur. Denemede A, B, C ve D olmak üzere dört farklı yerleşim sıklığına göre sırasıyla, 10 piliç/m², 12 piliç/m², 9 piliç/m² ve 8 piliç/m² olacak şekilde gruplar oluşturulmuştur. Deneme 2-6 haftalık yaş arasında sürdürülmüştür (7 gün adaptasyon periyodu ve 35 gün deneme periyodu). Yem ve su ad libitum olarak sağlanmıştır. Günde 23 saatlik aydınlatma uygulanmıştır. A, B, C ve D gruplarında canlı ağırlık kazancı (2-6 hafta) sırasıyla, 1851.337, 1823.556, 1745.777 ve 1834.663 g ortalama yem tüketimi 3987.333, 4098.667, 4081.333 ve 4123.667 g, yemden yararlanma oranı 2.154, 2.248, 2.338 and 2.248 olarak kaydedilmiştir. Ölüm oranı ise A, B, C ve D gruplarında sırasıyla %6.6 10.0 3.3 ve 0.0 olarak belirlenmiştir. Canlı ağırlık kazancı, yem tüketimi, yemden yararlanma oranı ve ölüm oranı bakımından yerleşim sıklığının istatistik açıdan önemli bir etkisi olmamıştır. Ancak, yoğun yerleşim sıklığı ölüm oranında görünür bir artışa yol açmıştır

🔖

Cite This Article

NAEEM, M., TAHİR, N., SHAHZAD, F. (2017). Pakistan’da Sıcak İklim Koşullarında Farklı Yerleşim Sıklığında Yetiştirilen Hubbord Irkı Etlik Piliçlerde Üretim Performansı. Tavukçuluk Araştırma Dergisi, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1, 1–4. https://ajindex.com/articles/319715

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Buijs, S., Keeling, L., Rettenbacher, S., Van Poucke, E. and Tuyttens, F.A.M. 2009. Stocking density effects on broiler welfare: Identifying sensitive ranges for different indicators. Poultry Science, 88:1536–1543
  2. Buijs, S., Keeling, L.J. and Tuyttens, F.A.M. 2011. Using motivation to feed as a way to assess the importance of space for broiler chickens. Animal Behaviour 81:1, 145-151
  3. Feddes, J.J.R., Emmanuel, E.J. and Zuidhof, M.J. 2002. Broiler performance, body weight variance, feed and water intake and carcass quality at different stocking densities. Poultry Science 81: 774-779
  4. Imaeda, N. 2000. Influence of stocking density and rearing season on incidence of Sudden Death Syndrome (SDS) in broiler chicks. Poultry Science 9:201-204
  5. Lallo, C.H.O., Williams, M. Campbell, M. and Palmer, D.W. 2012. Effects of stocking density on performance and economic implications for broilers grown to 42 days in open sided house in Trinidad. Trop. Agric. (Trinidad) Vol. 89, No. 3, July 2012, pp 170-180
  6. Meluzzi, A. and Sirri, F. 2009. Welfare of broiler chickens. Italian Journal of Animal Science 8, special issue supplement 1, 161-173
  7. Petek, M., Çibik, R., Yildiz, H., Sonat, F., Gezen, S., Orman, A. and Aydin, C. 2010. The influence of different lighting prog, stocking densities and litter amounts on the welfare and productivity traits of a commercial broiler line. Veterinarija ir Zootechnika 51, 36-43
  8. Puron, D., Santamaria, R., Segaura, J.C. and Alamilla, J.L. 1995. Broiler performance at different stocking densities. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 4: 55-60
  9. Sekeroglu, A., Sarica, M. Gulay, M.S. and Duman, M. 2011. Effect of stocking density on chick performance, internal organs weights and blood parameters in broiler. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 10 (2): 246-250
  10. Tong, H.B., Lu, J., Zou, J.M. Wang, Q. and Shi, S.R. 2012. Effects of stocking density on growth performance, carcass yield and immune status of a local chicken breed. Poultry Science 91: 667-673.