Journals / Selçuk Tıp Dergisi / 2003 / Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 4

Relationship between propofol sedation and level of sensory block

Sensoriyal blok seviyesi ile propofol sedasyonu arasındaki ilişki

Pages
209–213
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Sedation requirement is diminish rising block levels in the patient performed operation under spinal block.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim was to compare the effects of two different sensorial block levels on sedation with propofol during spinal anesthesia. 40 unpremedicated, ASA l-ll patients undergoing surgery under spinal anesthesia, were included the study.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Hyperbaric % 0,5 bupivacaine was used for spinal anesthesia in the dose range 10-15 mg.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Sedation requirement is diminish rising block levels in the patient performed operation under spinal block.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Anestezi · spinal · Propofol

Abstract

The aim was to compare the effects of two different sensorial block levels on sedation with propofol during spinal anesthesia. 40 unpremedicated, ASA l-ll patients undergoing surgery under spinal anesthesia, were included the study. Hyperbaric % 0,5 bupivacaine was used for spinal anesthesia in the dose range 10-15 mg. After 10 min, if the sensorial block had reached a sensory level to pinprick testing of T5-6, the patient was included in Group I and if block reached of T10-11 the patient was included in Group II. After competion of spinal block, these patient were given an IV bolus of propofol 0,5 mg.kg-1 in 3-4 min. Sedation that Ramsay scala level 3-4 was maintained with a constant-rate propofol infusion of minimum 0,5 mg.kg-1 and maximum 2 mg.kg-1 in Group I and II. In both groups, we exemined the relationship between total among of propofol and level of sensory block. Total propofol amount for Ramsay sedation scala level 3-4 in Group I ( sensory level is T5-6, total propofol amount = 125,6$pm$10,1 mg) is more less than Group II (sensory level is T10-11, total propofol amount 189,2$pm$13,6 mg) (p<0,05). Sedation requirement is diminish rising block levels in the patient performed operation under spinal block.

Özet

Spinal anestezi sırasında iki farklı sensoriyal blok seviyesinin propofol sedasyonu üzerine etkisinin karşılaştırması amaçlandı. Spinal anestezi ile operasyona alınacak 40 premedike edilmemiş hasta çalışmaya alındı. Spinal anestezi için 10-15 mg dozda % 0,5 hiperbarik bupivacaine kullanıldı. 10 dakika sonra, pinprick testi ile sensoriyal blok seviyesi T5-T6 arasında olan hastalar Grup I'e, blok T10-T11 arasında ise Grup II'ye dahil edildi. Spinal blok tam olarak oturduktan sonra bu hastalara 3-4 dakikada 0,5 mg.kg-1 propofol intravenöz (IV) yoldan bolus verildi. Sedasyon düzeyi Ramsay skalasına göre 3-4. seviyede olacak şekilde Grup I ve II hastalara minimum 0,5 mg.kg-1 ve maksimum 2 mg.kg-1 propofol infüzyonu planlandı. Her iki grup sedasyon seviyeleri ve propofolün total kullanılan miktarları bakımından karşılaştırıldı. Grup I'de Ramsay sedasyon skalası seviye 3-4'ü sağlamak için gerekli total propofol miktarı (sensoriyal blok seviyesi T5-6, total propofol miktarı 125,6±10,1 mg) Grup II hastalara göre (sensoriyal blok seviyesi T10-11, total propofol miktarı 189,2±13,6 mg) (p<0,05) daha az bulundu. Spinal blok ile operasyon uygulanan hastalarda sedasyon ihtiyacı artan blok seviyeleri ile azalmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇELİK, J., REİSLİ, R., TUNCER, S., DUMAN, A., YOSUNKAYA, A., ÖKESLİ, S. (2003). Relationship between propofol sedation and level of sensory block. Selçuk Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 19 - Sayı: 4, 209–213. https://ajindex.com/articles/319554

References (17)

  1. Smith I, Monk T, White P, Ding Y. Propofol Infusion during regional anesthesia: sedative, amnestic and anxiolytic properties. Anesth Analg 1994;79:313-9
  2. Mackenzie N, Grant IS.Propofol for intravenous sedation. Anaesthesia 1987;42:3-6
  3. Dubois A, Balatoni E, Peeters JP, Boudoux M. Use of propofol for sedation during gastrointestinal endo-scopies. Anaesthesia 1988; 43: 75-80
  4. Fanard L, Van Steenberge A, Demeire X, van der Puyl F. Comparison between propofol and midazoiam as sedative agents for surgery under ragional anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 1988; 43 ( Suppi): 87-9
  5. White PF, Negus JB. Sedative Infusions during local and regional anesthesia: a comparison of midazoiam and propofol. J Clin Anesth1991; 3: 32-9
  6. Çaplan RA, Ward RJ, Posner K, Cheney FW. Unexpected cardiac arrest during spinal anesthesia: a closed claims analysis of predisposing factors. Anesthesiology 1988; 68: 5-11
  7. Ben-David B, Vaida S, Gaitini L The influence of high spinal anesthesia on sensitivity to midazoiam sedation. Anesth Analg 1995; 81: 525-8
  8. Keats AS. Anesthesia mortality-a new mechanism. Anesthesiology 1988; 68: 2-4
  9. Schachinger H, Müller B, Strabel W, Drewe J, Ritz R. Effect of midazoiam on transfer function between beat lo beat arterial pressure and inter-beat interval length. Br J Anaesth 2000; 84:316-22 10. Veselis R, Reinsel R, Feshchenko V. The comparative amnestic effects of midazoiam, propofol, thiopental and fentanyl at equisedative concentrations. Anesthesiology 1997; 87: 749-64
  10. Hughes MA, Glass PS, Jacobs JR. Context-sensitive half-time in muiticampartment pharmacokinetic models for intravenous anesthetic drugs. Anesthesiology 1992; 76:334-41
  11. Shafer A, Doze VA, Shafer SL. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of propofol infusions during general anesthesia. Anesthesiology 1988; 69: 348-56
  12. Adam HK, Briggs LP, Bahar M,. Pharmacokinetic evaluation of ICI 35868 in man. Br J Anaesth 1983; 55: 97-103
  13. Gepts E, Camu F, Cockshott ID. Disposition of propofol administered as constant rate intravenous infusions in humans. Anesth Analg 1987; 66: 1256-63
  14. Greene NM. Physiology of spinal anesthesia. 3rd ed. Baltimore: Williams&Wilkins, 1981:45-54
  15. Gauthier RA, Dyck B, Chung F. Respiratory interaction after spinal anesthesia and sedation with midazolam. Anesthesiology 1992; 77:.909-14
  16. Gentili M, Huu PC, Enel D. Sedation depends on the level of sensory block induced by spinal anesthesia. Br J Anesh 1998;81:970-1
  17. Molliex S,