Journals / Selçuk Tıp Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 3

Results of scleral sutured intraocular lens implantation

Skleral fiksasyonlu göz içi lensi implantasyonu

Pages
144–150
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Long term studies with larger number of patients may better define the role of scleral sutured posterior chamber intraocular foldable lens implantation.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: To evaluate the results of posterior chamber intraocular lenses implanted by scleral fixation technique.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Method: 34 eyes of 34 cases which had intraocular lens implantation by scleral fixation method between January 2002 to December 2006 were retrospectively evaluated.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Long term studies with larger number of patients may better define the role of scleral sutured posterior chamber intraocular foldable lens implantation.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2002 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the results of posterior chamber intraocular lenses implanted by scleral fixation technique. Method: 34 eyes of 34 cases which had intraocular lens implantation by scleral fixation method between January 2002 to December 2006 were retrospectively evaluated. The parameters evaluated were the age and sex distribution, primary or secondary IOL implantation, type of implanted intra ocular lens, visual acuity, intra ocular pressure and complications. Results: The mean age of the patients was 52.55± 22.08 years (range 4 to 83 years). The mean follow up time was 6.41±6.49 (3–36) months. The mean postoperative best corrected visual acuities (BCVA) in PMMA IOL group and foldable IOL group were, 0.39±0.35 and 0.57±0.27, respectively (p=0.146). The mean postoperative best corrected visual acuities (BCVA) in primary implantation group and secondary implantation group were, 0.44±0.34 and 0.47±0.32, respectively (p=0.758). The postoperative complication rates in PMMA IOL group and foldable IOL group were 40.9% and 16.6%, respectively. Postoperative IOP increase and cystoid macular edema were the main complications. Implanted twenty-two IOLs were PMMA, and twelve were 3-piece hydrophobic acrylic. Conclusion: Implantation with scleral fixation of IOLs may be preferred in eyes with absence of zonular and capsular support. Although visual outcomes were similar for the two IOL types, scleral fixation of foldable IOLs take less time, have low incidence of complications and earlier visual rehabilitation. Long term studies with larger number of patients may better define the role of scleral sutured posterior chamber intraocular foldable lens implantation.

Özet

Amaç: Skleral fiksasyon tekniği ile arka kamaraya göz içi lensi implantasyonu sonuçlarının değerlendirilmesi. Yöntem: Ocak 2002 ile Aralık 2006 tarihleri arasında skleral fiksasyon tekniği ile göziçi lensi implante edilen 34 olgunun 34 gözüne ait kayıtlar retrospektif olarak değerlendirildi. Olgular, yaş, cinsiyet, primer veya sekonder GİL implantasyonu, implante edilen GİL cinsi, görme keskinliği, göziçi basıncı ve komplikasyonlar yönünden incelendi. Bulgular: Olguların yaş ortalaması 52.55±22.08 yıl (4-83) idi. Ortalama takip süresi 6.41±6.49 (3–36) aydı. Postoperatif en iyi düzeltilmiş görme keskinliği PMMA GİL grubunda 0.39±0.35, katlanabilir GİL grubunda 0.57±0.27 olarak saptandı (p=0.146). Primer GİL implante edilen grupta postoperatif en iyi düzeltilmiş görme keskinliği 0.44±0.34 iken, sekonder GİL implante edilen grupta ise 0.47±0.32 olarak saptandı (p=0.758). Postoperatif komplikasyon oranı PMMA GİL grubunda %40.9, katlanabilir GİL grubunda %16.6 olarak saptandı.Postoperatif göziçi basıncı yükselmesi ve kistoid maküler ödem başlıca komplikasyonları oluşturmaktaydı. İmplante edilen 22 GİL PMMA,12 GİL ise 3 parçalı hidrofobik akrilik idi. Sonuç: Kapsül ve zonül desteğin yeterli olmadığı gözlerde skleral fiksasyon ile GİL implantasyonu tercih edilebilir bir yöntemdir. Her iki GİL tipi ile görsel sonuçlar benzer olsa da, katlanabilir GİL ile skleral fiksasyon tekniği daha az zaman almakta, daha düşük komplikasyon oranı saptanmakta ve erken görsel rehabilitasyona imkan sağlanmaktadır. Katlanabilir GİL ile skleral fiksasyon tekniğinin etkinliği ve güvenilirliği için daha fazla sayıda olgu ile uzun süre izlemli çalışmalar yapılması yararlı olacaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞAHİN, A., KAMIŞ, Ü., OLTULU, R., GÖNÜL, Ş. (2009). Results of scleral sutured intraocular lens implantation. Selçuk Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 3, 144–150. https://ajindex.com/articles/319526

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Epley KD, Shainberg MJ, Lueder GT, Tychsen L. Pediatric secondary lens implantation in the absence of capsular support. J AAPOS. 2001; 5: 301-6
  2. Dick HB, Augustin AJ. Lens implant selection with absence of capsular support.Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2001; 12: 47-57
  3. Evereklioglu C, Er H, Bekir NA, Borazan M, Zorlu F. Comparison of secondary implantation of flexible open-loop anterior chamber and scleral-fixated posterior chamber intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003; 29: 301–8
  4. Por YM, Lavin MJ. Techniques of intraocular lens suspension in the absence of capsular/zonular support. Surv Ophthalmol 2005; 50: 429-62
  5. Cross HE, Jensen AD. Ocular manifestation in the Marfan syndrome and homocystinuria. Am J Ophthalmol 1973; 75: 405–20
  6. Lumme P, Laatikainen L. Exfoliation syndrome and cataract extraction. Am J Ophthalmol 1993; 116: 51–5
  7. Jensen AD, Cross HE, Paton D. Ocular complications in the Weill-Marchesani syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol. 1974; 77: 261-9
  8. Apple DJ, Price FW, Gwin T, et al: Sutured retropupillary posterior chamber intraocular lenses for exchange or secondary implantation. The 12th annual Binkhorst lecture, 1988. Ophthalmology 1989; 96: 1241-7
  9. Solomon K, Gussler JR, Gussler C, Van Meter WS. Incidence and management of complications of transsclerally sutured posterior chamber lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 1993; 19: 488-93
  10. Mittra RA, Connor TB, Han DP, Koenig SB, Mieler WF, Pulido JS. Removal of dislocated intraocular lenses using pars plana vitrectomy with placement of an open-loop, flexible anterior chamber lens. Ophthalmology 1998; 105: 1011-4
  11. Auffarth GU, Wesendahl TA, Brown SJ, Apple DJ. Are there acceptable anterior chamber intra-ocular lenses for clinical use in the 1990s? An analysis of 4104 explanted anterior chamber intra-ocular lenses. Ophthalmology 1994, 101:1913–22
  12. Malbran ES, Malbran E Jr, Negri I. Lens guide suture for transport and fixation in secondary IOL implantation after intracapsular extraction. Int Ophthalmol.1986; 9: 151-60
  13. Guell JL, Barrera A, Manero F. A review of suturing techniques for posterior chamber lenses. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2004; 15: 44-50
  14. Kaynak S, Ozbek Z, Pasa E, Oner FH, Cingil G. Transscleral fixation of foldable intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004; 30: 854-7
  15. Taskapili M, Gulkilik G, Engin G, Kocabora MS, Yilmazli C, Ozsutcu M, Kucuksahin H. Transscleral fixation of a single-piece hydrophilic foldable acrylic intraocular lens.Can