Journals / Selçuk Tıp Dergisi / 2008 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 2

Phospholipid solutions for prevention of intraperitoneal adhesions

Intraperitoneal adezyonların önlenmesinde fosfolipid solusyonlarının etkileri

Pages
91–96
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Application of phospholipid solutions is a cost-effective method for preventing consequent operations for intraabdominal adhesions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: In this study we aimed to analyze effects of phospholipid solutions (preventing adhesions by increasing slipperiness between damaged surfaces and detaching them) during peritoneal reepitelization.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Caecum serosa was damaged using sterile gauzes to achive light serosal haemorrhagy and 1 cm2 of periton excised from right side of abdominal wall in all rats.Group I was applied 3 ml %0.9 NaCl and Group II was applied phospholipid solution (Fresnius Kabi – Deustchland) intrabdominally before closure.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Application of phospholipid solutions is a cost-effective method for preventing consequent operations for intraabdominal adhesions.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Modeller · hayvan · Kadın

Abstract

Aim: In this study we aimed to analyze effects of phospholipid solutions (preventing adhesions by increasing slipperiness between damaged surfaces and detaching them) during peritoneal reepitelization. Material and Method: Thirty Wistar Albino type rats divided in two groups. Caecum serosa was damaged using sterile gauzes to achive light serosal haemorrhagy and 1 cm2 of periton excised from right side of abdominal wall in all rats.Group I was applied 3 ml %0.9 NaCl and Group II was applied phospholipid solution (Fresnius Kabi &#8211; Deustchland) intrabdominally before closure. Rats sacrified at postopertive 10th day. After macroscopically examining adhesions, adhesion surfaces were calculated with a calibration scale. In microscopic examination lymphocytes, plasma cells, polymorphonuclear cells, histiocytes and fibroblasts were marked and counted with Clemex Image Analysis system. Results: In phospholipid group there was a significant decrease in adhesion formation compared to control group macroscopically. The decrease in adhesion formation was statistically significant (p<0.05). There were also significant differences between two groups in microscopically observed fibroblast and PMNL ratios and this difference was also statistically significant. Conclusions: Usage of phopholipid solutions decreases postoperative adhesions. Application of phospholipid solutions is a cost-effective method for preventing consequent operations for intraabdominal adhesions.

Özet

Amaç: Çalışmamızda fosfolipid solüsyonlarının peritoneal reepitelizasyon sırasında hasarlı yüzeyler arasında kayganlık sağlayarak ve hasarlı yüzeyleri birbirinden ayırarak adezyon oluşumunu önlemedeki etkilerini incelemeyi planladık. Materyal ve Metod: Çalışmada 30 adet Wistar Albino cinsi dişi rat 2 gruba ayrıldı. Bütün ratlara steril spançlar ile çekum serozasında noktasal hemoraji oluşturacak şekilde serozal hasar oluşturuldu, sağ taraftan 1 cm2 genişliğinde periton tabakası eksize edilerek aynı girişim uygulandı. Grup I (kontrol): 3 ml %09’luk NaCl, Grup II (fosfolipid): Abdomen kapatılmadan önce 75 mg/kg dozda % 10’luk fosfolipid solusyonu (Fresenius Kabi Deutschland) intraperitoneal verilerek abdomen kapatıldı. Postoperatif 10. günde ratlar sakrifiye edildi. Adezyon alanları makroskopik olarak incelendikten sonra yapışıklık oluşturmuş alanlar kalibrasyon cetveli kullanı larak hesaplandı. Mikroskopik incelemede lenfositler, plazma hücreleri, polimorfonükleer hücreler, histiyositler ve fibroblastlar farklı farklı işaretlenerek Clemex Image Analizi sistemi ile otomatik olarak sayıldı. Bulgular: Çalışmamızda fosfolipid grubunda makroskopik olarak adezyon oluşumunda kontrol grubuna göre belirgin bir azalma tespit edildi. Bu fark istatiksel olarak anlamlı bulundu (p<0,05). Mikroskopik olarak fibroblast ve PMNL oranlarında her iki grup arasında farklılık saptanmış ve bu farklılık istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulunmuştur (p<0,05). Sonuç: Çalışmamızın sonuçlarına göre kullanılan fosfolipid solüsyonu postoperatif adezyonu azaltmaktadır. Maliyetinin düşük olması ve kolay uygulanabilmesi nedeniyle fosfolipid solusyonlarının postoperatif intraperitoneal adezyonları önlemede etkili olacağını düşünmekteyiz.

🔖

Cite This Article

TEKİN, Ş., YARAR, V. C., TEKİN, A., KÜÇÜKKARTALLAR, T., ŞAHİN, M., AVUNDUK, M. C. (2008). Phospholipid solutions for prevention of intraperitoneal adhesions. Selçuk Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 2, 91–96. https://ajindex.com/articles/319310

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Risberg B. Adhesions: preventive strategies. Eur J Surg Suppl 1997;577:32-9
  2. Drollette CM, Badawy SZ. Pathophysiology of pelvic adhesions. Modern trends in preventing infertility. J Reprod Med 1992;37:107-21
  3. Hills BA. Role of surfactant in peritoneal dialysis.Perit Dial Int. 2000; 20:503-15
  4. Gotloib,L.Anatomy of the peritoneal membrane.In Wichtig Proc.1st Course on Peritoneal dialysis, 1982.17
  5. DiPaolo,N., Bouncristiani, U.,Capatondo,L., Gaggiotti, E., De Mia M., Rossi P.,Sansoni, E.,ve ark. Phosphatidylcholine and peritoneal transport during peritoneal dialysis. Nephron 1986; 44:365
  6. Beavis J, Harwood JL, Coles GA; Williams JD.Synthesis of phospholipids by human peritoneal mesothelial cells. Perit Dial Int. 1994; 14: 348-355
  7. Chailley-Heu B, Rubio S, Rougier JP, Ducroc R, Barlier-Mur AM, Ronco P, ve ark. Expression of hydrophilic Surfactant proteins by mesentery cells in rat and man Biochem J 1997; 328: 251-6
  8. Treutner Kh, Bertram P,Lerch MM,Klimaszewski M, Petrovic-kallham S, Sobesky J, ve ark. Prevention of postoperative adhesions by single intraperitoneal medication. J Surg Res 1995; 59: 764-71
  9. Ching SS, Muralikrisnan VP, Whiteley GS. Relaparotomy: a five-year review of indications and outcome.Int J Clin Pract. 2003; 57:333-7
  10. Liakakos T, Thomakos N, Fine PM, Dervenis C, Young RL. Peritoneal adhesion: etiology, pathophysiology, and clinical significance. Racant advances in prevention and management. Dig Surg. 2001; 18:260-73
  11. Sarr, M. G., Tito, W. A.: Intestinal Obstruction. Shackelford's Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, (Ed) Zuidema G. D., 4th Edition Vol 5, Philadelphia, London, Toronto, Montreal, Sidney, Tokyo, WIB Saunders Company., 1996; 387-9
  12. Davidson, M. M., Park, R.: Systemic Administration of Heparin and Dicumarol for Postoperative Adhesions: An Experimental Study. Arch Surg., 1949; 59:300-25
  13. Kramer K, Senninger N, Herbst H, Probst W. Effective prevention of adhesions with hyaluronate. Arch Surg. 2002; 137:278-82
  14. Eyüboğlu, E., Aydemir, I., Pusane, A., Düren, M., Taşkın, M. Aprotininin Sıçanlarda Oluşturulan Fibrinopürülan Peritonit Üzerindeki Etkisi. Cerrahpaşa Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi, 1990; 21:325
  15. Hubay,C.A.,Weckesser,E. C., Holden,W.D.: The effect of Cortizone on the Prevention of peritoneal Adhesions. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet.,1953; 96:65-70
  16. Jackmain, U. L., Shumacker, H. B.:Effect of Histadyl Upon The prevention of peritoneal Adhesions. Am.J. Surg., 1962;104:20-1
  17. Doğru, O.