Journals / Selçuk Tıp Dergisi / 2007 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 4

Comparison of anti-adhesion materıals in preventing postsurgical adhesion in abdominal cavity

Ameliyat sonrası karın içi yapışıklıkların önlenmesinde chıtın’in etkinliğinin diğer adezyon bariyerleri ile karşılaştırılması

Pages
189–195
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Referencing this result, it has been understood that Chitin is much more effective than local and systemic anti-adhesive methods.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of different anti-adhesion Materials in Preventing Postsurgical peritoneal adhesion.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Method: 60 rats from Wistar Albino spiece that weights 250-300 g and about 10-11 ages are used in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Referencing this result, it has been understood that Chitin is much more effective than local and systemic anti-adhesive methods.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Doku yapışmaları · Sıçan · Sprague-Dawley

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of different anti-adhesion Materials in Preventing Postsurgical peritoneal adhesion. Material and Method: 60 rats from Wistar Albino spiece that weights 250-300 g and about 10-11 ages are used in the study. They were separated into 5 groups. The rats were operated after Kethamine HCL anesthesia. In all rats, a midline laparatomy was done, in a 4 cm length. To the right side of the abdominal wall, 2 cm along 10 parellel incision were applied. To the left side of it, a peritoneum layer was incised as 2x2 cm2. The abdominal wall was sutured with 3/0 silk by continue method. Group I: Control group, Group II: 3X3 cm2 in size Chitin layers (Suprofilm®) were placed on the incision areas. Group III: 3X3 cm2 in size Na-Hyaluronat / Carboxymethylcellulose layers (Seprafilm®) were placed on the incision areas. Group IV: To the abdominal cavity, 25 % diluted 2 cc Na-Hyaluronat gel was poured, Group V: 15mg/kg metilprednizolon was injected as I.M. On the 11th day of Research, under Ketamine anesthesia, abdominal wall opened and the adhesions were scored according to Granat Score. From all groups of rats, blood samples were taken. On the samples, Hb, AST, BUN and Albumin levels were studied. Results: The Adhesion frequency In Group I, was defined on the right abdominal wall as 82%, on the left as 91%, In Group II, on the right as 8.3%, on the left as 25%, In Group III, on the right as 17%, on the left as 33%, In Group IV, on the right as 50%, on the left as 58%, In Group V, on the right as 50%, on the left as 42%. The adhesion grade in groups was defined as; Group I: 2.63±1.22, Group II: 0.58±0.66, Group III: 1.08±1.08, Group IV: 1.41±1.44, Group V: 1.41±1.50. The adhesion phase in all study groups was found meaningfully low compared to the control group as p<0.05. Besides, the adhesion grade of Suprofilm® group was found meaningfully low compared to the other groups as p<0.05. A meaningful difference was not observed among Serologic and hematological parameters in all groups as P>0.05. Conclusion: Chitin meaningfully decreases the postoperative peritoneal adhesion frequency and adhesion grade on Rats. Referencing this result, it has been understood that Chitin is much more effective than local and systemic anti-adhesive methods.

Özet

Postoperatif peritoneal adezyonların önlenmesinde farklı antiadeziv maddelerin etkilerinin belirlenmesidir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmaya 60 adet Sprague-Dawley cinsi dişi rat alındı. Ratlar 12’şerli 5 gruba ayrıldılar. Bütün ratlar Ketamine HCL ile uyutulduktan sonra 4 cm’lik orta hat kesisi ile karına girildi. Karın duvarında, sağ tarafta 2cm uzunluğunda 10 adet peritoneal kesi yapıldı, sol tarafta 2X2 cm2 genişliğinde periton tabakası eksize edildi, batın 3/0 ipekle kontinu olarak kapatıldı. Grup I: herhangi bir işlem yapılmadı, Grup II: kesi alanlar›na 3X3 cm2 boyutta chitin tabakası (Suprofilm®) konuldu, Grup III: kesi alanlarına 3X3 cm2 boyutta Na-Hyaluronat / Carboxymethylcellulose (Seprafilm®) konuldu, Grup IV: batın içine % 25 oranında sulandırılmış 2 cc Na-Hyaluronat jel döküldü, Grup V: 15mg/kg dozunda metilprednizolon i.m. olarak verildi. Çalışmanın 11. günü ratlar sacrifiye edilerek 5’er cc kan alındı. Batın açılarak adezyonlar Granat Skoruna göre skorlandı. Kan örneklerinden Hb, AST, BUN ve Albumin düzeyleri çalışıldı. Bulgular: Adezyon sıklığı Grup I’de sağda %82, solda % 91, Grup II’de sağda %8.3, solda %25, Grup III’te, sağda %17, solda %33, Grup IV’te sağda %50, solda %58, Grup V’te sağda %50, solda %42 olarak bulundu. Adezyon evresi gruplarda; Grup I: 2.63±1.22, Grup II: 0.58±0.66, Grup III: 1.08±1.08, Grup IV: 1.41±1.44, Grup V: 1.41±1.50 olarak belirlendi. Adezyon evresi tüm çalışma gruplarında kontrol grubuna göre anlamlı olarak düşük bulundu, p 0.05. Sonuç: Chitin Ratlarda postoperatif peritoneal adezyon sıklığını ve evresini anlamlı olarak düşürmekterdir. Bu yönüyle lokal ve sistemik antiadezivlerden daha etkili olduğu kanaatine varılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞAHİN, M., ÇAKIR, M., AVŞAR, F. M., TEKİN, A., KÜÇÜKKARTALLAR, T., AKÖZ, M. (2007). Comparison of anti-adhesion materıals in preventing postsurgical adhesion in abdominal cavity. Selçuk Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 4, 189–195. https://ajindex.com/articles/319151

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Ellis H. Wound repair-reaction of the peritoneum to injury. Ann R. Coll. Surg. 1978;60:219-21
  2. Sahin M, Gürocak B, Tavlı fi, Avşar FM, Aksoy F, Aköz M. Effects of different doses of steroid in the prevention of intra-abdominal adhesions. Int J Surgical Investigation 301-6
  3. Kağızman SH, Belviranlı M, şahin M, Vatansev C, Karahan Ö, Alptekin H. Mekanik intestinal obstrüksiyona bağlı opere edilmiş hastaların klinik analizi. T. Klin. 1997;17:203-9
  4. Lehr C-M, Bouwstra JA, Schacht EH. In vitro evaluation of mucoadhesive properties of chitosan and some other natural polymers. Int J Pharm 1992;78:43-4
  5. Obara K, Ishihara M, Ishizuka T. Photocrosslinkable chitosan hydrogel containing fibroblast growth factor- 2 stimulates wound healing in healing-impaired db/db mice. Biomaterials 2003;24:3437–44
  6. Granat M, Tur-Kapsa I, Zylber-Katz E, Schenker JG. Reduction of peritoneal adhesion formation by colchicine: a comparative study in the rat. Fertil Steril 1983;40:369-72
  7. Stewardson RH, Bombeck CT, Nyhus LM. Critical operative management of small bowel obstruction. Ann Surg. 1978;187:189-93
  8. Raf LE. Causes of abdominal adhesions in cases of intestinal obstructions. Acta Chir. Scand 1969;135:75-6
  9. Sannella NA. Early and late obstruction of the small bowel after abdominoperineal resection. Am. J. Surg. 1975;130:270-2
  10. Raf LE. Causes of small intestinal obstruction. A study covering the Stockholm area. Acta Chir. Scand 1969;135:67-72
  11. Özer fiB, Kaymak E. Peritonun yaralanmaya karşı reaksiyonu ve periton içi yapışıklık problemi (In Turkish). İzmir Devlet Hastanesi Tıp Dergisi. 1990;28:237-43
  12. Gazzaniga AB, James JM, Shobe JB. Prevention of peritoneal adhesions in the rat. The effects of dexamethasone, methylprednisone, promethazine and human fibrinolysin. Arch. Surg. 1975;110:429-32
  13. Milligan DW, Raftery AT. Observations on the pathogenesis of peritoneal adhesions: a light and electron microscopical study. Br. J. Surg. 1974;61:274-80
  14. VandeVord PJ, Matthew HWT, DeSilva SP. Evaluation of the biocompatibility of a chitosan scaffold in mice. J Biomed Mater Res 2002;59:585–90
  15. Nordtveit RJ, Varum KM, Smidsrød O. Degradation of partially N-acetylated chitosans with hen egg white and human lysozyme. Carbohydr Polym 1996; 29:163–7
  16. Varurn KM, Myhr MM, Hjerde RJN. In vitro degradation rates of partially N-acetylated chitosans in human serum. Carbohydr Res 1997;299:99–101
  17. Tomihata K, Ikada Y. In vitro and in vivo degradation