Journals / Selçuk Tıp Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 1

Dosimetric Evaluation of Two Different Total Body Irradiaton Techniques Using Eclips Treatment Plannig System

Pages
33–38
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The lateral position provides an advantage in terms of more homogenous dose distribution and better quality planning.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: This study compares the organ doses at risk by using the Eclipse treatment planning system for two common total body irradiation techniques (TBI) at extended source skin distance.Patients and Methods: 3D treatment plans with AP-PA (anteroposterior) technique were created retrospectively for 20 patients treated bilateral TBI.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For each patient, the whole body, kidneys, lungs, thyroid and liver were contoured to create (DVH) dose volume histograms and examine 3D dose volume distributions.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The lateral position provides an advantage in terms of more homogenous dose distribution and better quality planning.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Aim: This study compares the organ doses at risk by using the Eclipse treatment planning system for two common total body irradiation techniques (TBI) at extended source skin distance.Patients and Methods: 3D treatment plans with AP-PA (anteroposterior) technique were created retrospectively for 20 patients treated bilateral TBI. For each patient, the whole body, kidneys, lungs, thyroid and liver were contoured to create (DVH) dose volume histograms and examine 3D dose volume distributions. The mean doses of thyroid, lung, kidney, liver, whole body and treatment volumes and the maximum doses of 2% volumes (D2) were calculated from the dose volume histogram and transferred to the SPSS file. The non-parametric Wilcoxon test was used to compare the dose values for two techniques. Results: Thyroid gland mean doses were significantly lower in lateral technique (11.98 and 12.64 Gy, p = 0.21). It was observed no statistically dose difference between the two techniques in terms of lung doses. Since, the lungs were protected by lead blocks in both of two techniques. The mean doses of liver and kidney were lower in the lateral TBI technique (p = 0.002 and p = 0.004, respectively). D2 doses of liver were lower in AP-PA planning technique (p = 0.032). In comparison of the hot points between the two techniques, the lateral position was significantly superior (p <0.0001).Conclusions: In present study, it was observed that the bilateral position was superior to the AP-PA position in order to prevent the hot spots. In the AP-PA position, it is more difficult to tolerate the body irregularities. Additionally, when comparing the dose distributions of the organs (liver, kidney, thyroid), it was seen that the results were statistically better in the lateral position. The lateral position provides an advantage in terms of more homogenous dose distribution and better quality planning.

🔖

Cite This Article

DİNC, S. C., DEMİRCAN, N. V., TURAN, A. N., SENTURK, M. E., KARAHACİOGLU, E., BORA, H. (2020). Dosimetric Evaluation of Two Different Total Body Irradiaton Techniques Using Eclips Treatment Plannig System. Selçuk Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 36 - Sayı: 1, 33–38. https://ajindex.com/articles/319001

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Van Dyk J, Galvin JM, Glasgow GW, et al. AAP-PAM report No
  2. The physical aspects of total and half body photon irradiation. American Inst Phys: New York; 1986
  3. F.M.Khan. The physics of radiation therAP-PAhy, 4th Edition, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia 2009; p.405
  4. Sourati A, Ameri A, Malekzadeh M. Acute side effects of radiation therAP-PAy 2017
  5. Abraham D, Colussi V, Shina D, et al. TBI treatment planning using the adac pinnacle treatment planning system. Medical Dosimetry 2000;25,4:219-24
  6. Thomas O, Mahe M, Campion L, et al. Longterm complications of total body irradiation in adults. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2001;49:125-31
  7. Tamura K, Shimaoka K, Friedman M. Thyroid abnormalities associated with treatment of malignant lymphoma. Cancer 1981;47(11):2704-11
  8. Paulino A, Wen B, Brown C, et al. Late effects in children treated with radiation therAP-PAy for wilms‘ Tumor. International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics 2000;46,5:1239-46
  9. Stuart AL, Clark DJ, Wallace WH, et al. Endocrine deficit after fractionated total body irradiations. Arch Dis Child. 1992; 67(9):1107-10
  10. Sklar CA, Kim TH, Ramsay NKC. Thyroid dysfunction among long-term survivors of bone marrow transplantation. Am J Med 1982; 73: 688-94
  11. Quast U. Whole body radiotherAP-PAhy: A TBI-guideline J Med Phys 2006;31(1):5-12
  12. Fisher DR, Hendry JH. Dose fractionation and hepatocyte clonogens: Alpha/beta congruent to 1-2 Gy, and beta decreases with increasing delay before assay. Radiat Res 1988;113(1):51-7
  13. Thomas ED, Clift RA, Hersman J, et al. Marrow transplantation for acute nonlymphoblastic leukemic in first remission using fractionated or singledose irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1982;8(5):817-21
  14. Lawton CA, Cohen EP, Murray KJ, et al. Long-term results of selective renal shielding in patients undergoing total body irradiation in preparation for bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant 1997;20(12):1069-74
  15. Gunderson T. Clinical Radiation Oncology. J.B. Lippincott Ed 2003;126-56
  16. Sanchez, F, Quast U, Arrans R, et al. Reporting total body irradiation prior to bone marrow transplantation. European group for blood and marrow transplantation (EBMT) 1992;36-126
  17. Podgorsak EB. Radiation oncology physics: A handbook for teachers and students, International Atomic Energy Agency 2005;224-86
  18. Lavallee M, Aubin S, Larochelle M, et al. 3D heterogeneous dose distrubutions for total body irradiation