SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2019 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1

RADICAL PERIOD on THE USE of FORCE: BUSH DOCTRINE, INVASION of IRAQ and INTENSIFYING JUST/HOLY WAR DEBATES

KUVVET KULLANIMINDA RADİKAL DÖNEM: BUSH DOKTRİNİ, IRAK İŞGALİ VE YOĞUNLAŞAN HAKLI/KUTSAL SAVAŞ TARTIŞMALARI

MUSTAFA YETİM
Hüsna TAŞ YETİM
Pages
345–364
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this context, the study intends to analyze USA’s discursive and political practices to justify Iraq war that brings Bush Doctrine to holy war, international reactions to these attempts and tangible results of these policies through the Iraq example.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The debate on the fight against global terrorism and the use of force has intensified in the field of international relations as a result of the September 11, 2001 ​​terrorist attacks in the United States of America perpetrated by al-Qaeda.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Designing its strategy with Bush Doctrine against “new” threat within global area, United States of America’s (USA) first and concrete use of force in this context was the invasion of Iraq in 2003.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this context, the study intends to analyze USA’s discursive and political practices to justify Iraq war that brings Bush Doctrine to holy war, international reactions to these attempts and tangible results of these policies through the Iraq example.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2001 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Bush Doktrini · 2003 Irak Savaşı · Önleyici Savaş

Abstract

The debate on the fight against global terrorism and the use of force has intensified in the field of international relations as a result of the September 11, 2001 ​​terrorist attacks in the United States of America perpetrated by al-Qaeda. Designing its strategy with Bush Doctrine against “new” threat within global area, United States of America’s (USA) first and concrete use of force in this context was the invasion of Iraq in 2003. The present study firstly assesses the Bush Doctrine with respect to the historical and present context of the use of force. The Bush Doctrine that links a more peaceful and safe world to global democratization, is analyzed within the framework of “the just war” (bellum iustum) and its important tradition and least-emphasized dimension within the literature, holy war. In this context, the study intends to analyze USA’s discursive and political practices to justify Iraq war that brings Bush Doctrine to holy war, international reactions to these attempts and tangible results of these policies through the Iraq example.

Özet

11 Eylül 2001 tarihinde el-Kaide tarafından ABD’ye düzenlenen terörist saldırılar uluslararası ilişkiler alanında küresel terörizm ile mücadele ve kuvvet kullanımı ile ilgili tartışmaları yeniden yoğunlaştırmıştır. Küresel alandaki “yeni” tehdide karşı stratejisini Bush Doktrini ile oluşturan küresel güç ABD’nin bu çerçevedeki ilk ve somut kuvvet uygulaması 2003 yılındaki Irak işgali olmuştur. Bu çalışma ilk olarak Irak işgali ile somut nitelik kazanan Bush Doktrinini, kuvvet kullanımının tarihsel gelişimi ve günümüzdeki kapsamı açısından değerlendirmektedir. Dünyanın daha barışçıl ve güvenilir olmasını demokrasilerin küresel alanda yaygınlaştırılmasına bağlayan Bush Doktrini, haklı savaş ve bu savaş biçiminin önemli geleneği ve literatürde yeterince dikkat çekilmeyen boyutu kutsal savaş bağlamında incelenmektedir. Bu bağlamda çalışma, Bush doktrinini kutsal savaşa yaklaştıran Irak savaşını gerekçelendirmeye yönelik kullanılan Amerika Birleşik Devletleri’nin (ABD) siyasi ve söylemsel eylemlerini, bu girişimlere uluslararası tepkileri ve bu girişimlerin somut sonuçlarını Irak örneği üzerinden analiz etmeyi amaçlamaktadır

🔖

Cite This Article

YETİM, M., YETİM, H. T. (2019). RADICAL PERIOD on THE USE of FORCE: BUSH DOCTRINE, INVASION of IRAQ and INTENSIFYING JUST/HOLY WAR DEBATES. Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 1, 345–364. https://ajindex.com/articles/316108

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. “ABD Savaşı Bitirdi Enkaz Irak’a Kaldı”, Milliyet, 16 December 2011.
  2. Adem, Seifudein, “Constructing a New Imperial Order? The War in Iraq and the Ideology of Clashism”, Alternatives, Vol. 2, No.2 (2003), p. 1-26.
  3. Aksar, Yusuf, Teoride ve Uygulamada Uluslararası Hukuk II, (Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık, 2015).
  4. Altunışık, Meliha Benli, “Turkey’s Iraq Policy: The War and Beyond, Journal of Cotemporary European Studies, Vol. 14, No. 2 (2006), p. 183-196.
  5. Antic, Miljenko, “Iraq War (2003-): Was it morally Justified?”, Politicka Misao, Vol. 46, No.1 (2009), p. 88-115.
  6. Arı, Tayyar, Irak, İran, ABD ve Petrol, (İstanbul: Alfa Yayınları, 2007).
  7. Aydın, Mustafa, Nihat Ali Özcan and Neslihan Kaplanoğlu, “Riskler ve Fırsatlar kavşağında Irak’ın geleceği ve Türkiye”, TEPAV Ortadoğu Çalışmaları, (2007), p. 1-144.
  8. Bahaa, Sherine, “Arab Anger”, Al-Ahram Weekly, 10-16 April 2003.
  9. Banta, Benjami R., “Just War Theory and the 2003 Iraq War Forced Displacement”, Journal of Refugee Studies, Vol. 21, No. 3 (2008), p. 261-284.
  10. Bellamy, Alex J. and Paul D. Williams, “The New Politics of Protection? Cote d’Ivoire, Libya, and the Responsibility to Protect”, International Affairs, Vol. 82, No. 7 (2011), p. 825-850.
  11. Bellamy, Alex J., "Ethics and Intervention: the ‘Humanitarian Exception’ and the Problem of Abuse in the Case of Iraq", Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 41, No. 2 (2004), p. 131-147.
  12. Beres, Louis Rene, "On Assassination as Anticipatory Self-defense: the Case of Israel", Hofstra Law Review, Vol. 20, No. 2 (1991), p. 321-340.
  13. Bloker, Niels M., “Is the Authorization Authorized? Powers and Practice of the UN Security Council to Authorize the Use of Force by “Coalitions of the Able and Willing”, EJIL, Vol. 11, No. 3 (2000), p. 541-568.
  14. Brunne, Jutta, and Stephen J. Toope, “Slouching Towards New ‘Just Wars’: International Law and The Use of Force After September 11th”, Netherlands International Law Review, Vol. LI (2004), p. 363-392.
  15. Byers, Michael, “Terrorism, the Use of Force and International Law after 11 September”, International Relations, Vol. 16 (2002), p. 155-171.
  16. Chesterman, Simon, “‘Leading from Behind’: The Responsibility to Protect, the Obama Doctrine, and Humanitarian Intervention after Libya”, Ethics and International Affairs, Vol. 25, No. 3 (2011), p. 279-285.
  17. Delahunty, Robert J. and Yoo, John, “ ‘The Bush Doctrine’: Can Preventive War Be Justified?”, Harvard Journal of Law & Public Policy, Vol. 32, No. 3 (2009), p. 843-865.
  18. Dodge, Toby, “The US and Iraq: Time to go Hom