SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Selçuk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Sosyal ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi / 2002 / Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 3

21. Yüzyılda Türk Bürokrasisinin Sorunları ve Çözüm Önerileri

ORHAN GÖKCE
ALİ ŞAHİN
Pages
1–27
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

After that the problems of public bureaucracy will be determined systematically and finally solution proposal to these problems are studied.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The main purpose of this study is to determine the problems of public bureaucracy which is inefficient and ineffective in the 21th century charecterized the period open and rapid technology through globelization.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this purpose first of all, idendification of the definition and scope of bureaucracy will be important.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:After that the problems of public bureaucracy will be determined systematically and finally solution proposal to these problems are studied.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Türkiye · Turkey

Abstract

The main purpose of this study is to determine the problems of public bureaucracy which is inefficient and ineffective in the 21th century charecterized the period open and rapid technology through globelization. For this purpose first of all, idendification of the definition and scope of bureaucracy will be important. In this respect these issues will be mentioned first. After that the problems of public bureaucracy will be determined systematically and finally solution proposal to these problems are studied.

Özet

Bu çalışmadaki temel amaç, küreselleşmeye açık ve hızlı teknolojik değişimin yaşandığı 21. yüzyılda hantal ve iş göremez durumunda olan kamu bürokrasinin sorunlarını tespit etmek ve çağa uygun çözüm önerileri getirmektir. Bu amaç doğrultusunda öncelikle bürokrasi kavramının tanımı ve kapsamının ortaya konulması önem arzetmektedir. Bu bağlamda çalışmada, bürokrasi kavramının tanımı ve kapsamı ile bürokrasi kuramları öncelikli olarak ele alınmaktadır. Sonra kamu bürokrasinin sorunları sistemli olarak belirlenmekte ve en son olarak da belirlenen sorunlara çözüm önerileri getirilmeye çalışılmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖKCE, O., ŞAHİN, A. (2002). 21. Yüzyılda Türk Bürokrasisinin Sorunları ve Çözüm Önerileri. Selçuk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Sosyal ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 2 - Sayı: 3, 1–27. https://ajindex.com/articles/315985

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Baecker, Dirk (2000); Wozu Kultur?, Berlin: Kulturverlag Kadmos. Bismarck, Otto v. (1898): Gedanken und Erinnerungen, 2 Bände, Stuttgart: J.G. Cotta Nachf, 1898. Bolz, Norbert (2002);
  2. Das konsumistische Manifest, München: Wilhelm Fink. Dux, Günter (1992); Die Zeit in der Geschichte. Ihre Entwicklungslogik vom Mythos zur Weltzeit, stw 1025, Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp. Elias, Norbert (1969a); Über den Prozeß der Zivilisation. Soziogenetische und psychogenetische Untersuchungen. Erster Band: Wandlungen des Verhaltens in den weltlichen Oberschichten des Abendlande, stw 158, 2. Aufl., Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp 1977.
  3. Elias, Norbert (1969b); Über den Prozeß der Zivilisation. Soziogenetische und psychogenetische Untersuchungen. Zweiter Band: Wandlungen der Gesellschaft. Entwurf zu einer Theorie der Zivilisation, stw 159. 2. Aufl., Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp 1977.
  4. Fraser, Julius T. (1987); Die Zeit. Auf den Spuren eines vertrauten und doch fremden Phänomens, dtv 11422, München: dtv 1991.
  5. Frazer, James George (1922); The Golden Bough. A Study in Magic and Religion, Abridged edition, London: Macmillan 1987. Glissant, Édouard (1999);
  6. Traktat über die Welt, Heidelberg: Wunderhorn. Gontscharow, Iwan (1859); Oblomow, Roman, 2. Aufl., Zürich: Manesse 1987.
  7. Hobbes, Thomas (1651); Leviathan, oder Stoff, Form und Gewalt eines kirchlichen und bürgerlichen Staates, Hg. Iring FETSCHER, stw 462, Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp 1984. Hofstätter, Peter R. (1957); Fischer Lexikon Psychologie "Völkerpsychologie", FL 6., Neuausg. (Frankfurt a.M.: Fischer 1977), ss. 343 – 347. Hofstede, Geert (1984); Culture's Consequences. International Differences in Work-Related Values, Cross-Cultural Research and Methodology Series 5. London/&c.: Sage 1984.
  8. Hofstede, Geert (1991a); Cultures and Organizations. Software of the Mind, New York/&c.: McGraw-Hill, 1997.
  9. Hofstede, Geert (1991b); Lokales Denken, globales Handeln. Kulturen, Zusammenarbeit und Management., [engl. Original: Cultures and Organizations, Software of the Mind] dtv 50807, München: dtv 1997.
  10. Jakobson, Roman (1960); "Linguistics and Poetics", Style in Language, Hg. Thomas A. Sebeok (Repr., Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press 1968), ss. 350 - 377. Krusche, Helmut (1992); Der Frosch auf der Butter. NLP - Die Grundlagen des Neuro-Linguistischen Programmierens, 2. Aufl., Düsseldorf/etc.: Econ 1994.
  11. Lange, Wolfgang (1983); "Tod ist bei Göttern nur ein Vorurteil. Zum Komplex des Mythos bei Nietzsche", Mythos und Moderne. Begriff und Bild einer Rekonstruktion