Journals / Selçuk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Sosyal ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 18

Türkiye'de eğitim harcamalarının farklı illerin üretim düzeyleri üzerine etkileri: Panel veri analizi

Pages
215–230
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Besides examining relationship overall in Turkey, two more groups are generated as provinces with higher and lower per capita GDP than the country average.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the relationship between educational expenditures and production levels is examined over the period of 1990-2001 in Turkey, by using province data.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Besides examining relationship overall in Turkey, two more groups are generated as provinces with higher and lower per capita GDP than the country average.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results also indicate that the effect of secondary level education expenditure on production growth is higher forboth for overall Turkey and for provinces with lower than average GDP group than that of above average provinces.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2001 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, the relationship between educational expenditures and production levels is examined over the period of 1990-2001 in Turkey, by using province data. Besides examining relationship overall in Turkey, two more groups are generated as provinces with higher and lower per capita GDP than the country average. Panel data approach is used in order to analyze the relationship between total, primary and secondary level education expenditures and provincial production growth.The results show that total, primary and secondary education expenditure coefficients, consistent with previous economic studies, are statistically significant and positive. The results also indicate that the effect of secondary level education expenditure on production growth is higher forboth for overall Turkey and for provinces with lower than average GDP group than that of above average provinces.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, Türkiye'de 1990-2001 yıllan arasındaki dönemde, il bazında veriler kullanılarak, eğitim harcamaları ile illerin üretim düzeyleri arasındaki ilişkiler incelenmiştir. Türkiye geneli yanında, kişi başına GSYİH Türkiye ortalamasının altında ve üstünde olan illerden oluşturulan iki grup iller için, toplam eğitim harcamaları yanında, ilköğretim ve ortaöğretim harcamalarıyla bölgelerin üretim düzeyleri arasındaki ilişki panel veri yöntemiyle analiz edilmiştir. Tahmin sonuçlarına göre, Türkiye geneli ve diğer gruplarda, toplam, ilköğretim ve ortaöğretim harcamaları katsayıları beklenildiği gibi pozitif ve istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulunmuştur. Türkiye genelinde ve kişi başına GSYİH ortalamasının altında kalan illerde, ortaöğretim harcamalarının üretim artışına etkisi, ortalama üstünde kalan illere göre daha yüksek çıkmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

DOĞRUL, A. N., ÖZER, M. (2009). Türkiye'de eğitim harcamalarının farklı illerin üretim düzeyleri üzerine etkileri: Panel veri analizi. Selçuk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Sosyal ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 18, 215–230. https://ajindex.com/articles/315852

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Barro, R.J., (1991) "Economic Growthin a Cross Section of Countries", Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol: 106. Bhargava, A., L. Franzini ve W. Narendranathan, (1982); "Serial Correlation and The Fixed Effects Model", The Review of Economic Studies, 49 (4), Canpolat, N., (2000) "Türkiye'de Beşeri Sermaye Birikimi ve Ekonomik Büyüme", Hacettepe Üniversitesi İ.İ.B.F. Dergisi, Cilt: 18 (2) Çoban, O., (2004) "Beşeri Sermayenin İktisadi Büyüme Üzerindeki Etkisi: Türkiye Örneği", İstanbul Üniversitesi S.B.F. Dergisi, Sayı 30. Denison, E. F., (1962) "Education, Economic Growth and Gaps in Information", Journal of Political Economy. Denison, E.F. (1985), Trends in American Economic Growth 1929-1982,
  2. The Brooking Institution. Greene, W.H., (1997),
  3. Econometric Analysis, Prentice Hall, 3rd Edition.
  4. Gujurati, D.N. (1995),
  5. Basic Econometrics, McGraw-Hill. Jones, C.I. (1996), "Human Capital Ideas and Economic Growth", VIII Villa Montragone International Seminar in Rome. Krueger, A.B. ve Lindahl, M. (1999), "Education for Growth in Sweden and the World, NBER Working Papers No: 7190. Lucas, R. (1988), "On the Mechanics of Economic Development", Journal of Monetary Economics, July. Lau, L.J., S. Liu, ve S. Ravkin (1993), "Education and Economic Growth Some Cross Sectional Evidence from Brazil", Journal of Development Economics, Sayı: 41. Lucas, R. (1988), "On the Mechanics of Economic Development", Journal of Monetary Economics, July. Mankiw, N.G., D. Romer, D.N. Weil, (1992) "A Contribution to the Empires of Economics", Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol 107. Mankiw, N.G., D. Romer, D.N. Weil, (1995)
  6. The Growth of Nations, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, Vol 1. Martin, N.G. ve A.A. Herranz, (2004), "Human Capital and Economic Growth in Spanish Regions", IAER, Vol 10/4. Mincer, J., (1973) "Human Capital and Earnings", Wealth Income and Inequality, Penguin Education. Musila, J.W. ve W. Bellasi, (2004) "The Impact of Education Expenditures on Economic Growth in Uganda Evidence From Time Series Data", The Journal of Developing Areas, Vol 38/1. Nelson, R. ve E. Phelps, (1966) "Investment in Humans, Technological Diffusion and Economic Growth", American Economic Review, 51/2. OECD, (2005),
  7. Education At a Glance Indicator, Paris. Petrakis, P.E. ve D. Stamatakis, (2002)"Growth and Educational Levels a Comparative Analysis", Economics of Education Review, Vol 21. Psacharopoulos, G. (1973). Returns to Education: An International Comparison. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Psacharopoul