SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Selçuk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi (:Selçuk Tarım ve Gıda Bilimleri Dergisi) / 2008 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 44

A study on levene and bartlett tests

Levene ve bartlett testleri üzerine bir inceleme

COŞKUN KUŞ
İSMAİL KESKİN
Pages
78–83
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In addition, the shortcomings of these software are pointed out in terms of the testing homogeneity of variances and some solution approaches are also suggested.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, the problems which may arise from using Bartlett and Levene tests for the control of variances homogeneity are investigated.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The differences in the performance of MINITAB 14 and SPSS 13 software in the Levene test are discussed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In addition, the shortcomings of these software are pointed out in terms of the testing homogeneity of variances and some solution approaches are also suggested.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:test · karşılaştırmalar · Monte Karlo Metodu

Abstract

In this study, the problems which may arise from using Bartlett and Levene tests for the control of variances homogeneity are investigated. The differences in the performance of MINITAB 14 and SPSS 13 software in the Levene test are discussed. In addition, the shortcomings of these software are pointed out in terms of the testing homogeneity of variances and some solution approaches are also suggested.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, varyansların homojenliğinin sınanması için Bartlett ve Levene testlerinin kullanımında ortaya çıkabilecek problemler incelenmiştir. MINITAB 14 ve SPSS 13 yazılımlarının Levene testinin performasındaki farklılıklar tartışılmıştır. Ek olarak bu yazılımların varyansların homojenliğini test etmedeki zayıf noktalarına işaret edilmiş ve aynı zamanda çözüm yolları önerilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KUŞ, C., KESKİN, İ. (2008). A study on levene and bartlett tests. Selçuk Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi (:Selçuk Tarım ve Gıda Bilimleri Dergisi), Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 44, 78–83. https://ajindex.com/articles/315361

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Boos, D. D., Brownie, C., 1989. Bootstrap Methods for Testing Homogeneity of Variances. Technometrics, 31(1), 69–82.
  2. Box, G. E. P., 1953. Non-normality and Tests on Variances. Biometrika, 40, 318–335.
  3. Brown, M. B., Forsythe, A. B., 1974. Robust Tests for the Equality of Variance, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 69, 364-367.
  4. Conover, W. J., Johnson, M. E., Johnsons, M. M., 1981. A Comparative Study of Tests for Homogeneity of Variances with Applications to the Outer Continental Shelf Bidding Data. Technometrics, 23, 351–361.
  5. Islam, K., 2006. Transformed Tests For Homogeneıty of Variances and Means, Doctor of Philosophy, Graduate College of Bowling Gren State University, Bowling Green, Ohio. Levene, H., 1960. Contributions to Probability and Statistics. Stanford University Press,
  6. CA. Lim, T. S., Loh, W. Y., 1996. A Comparison of Tests of Equality of Variances. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 22, 287–301.
  7. Miller, R. G. Jr., 1986.
  8. Beyond ANOVA, Basics of Applied Statistics.Wiley, New York. Ott, L., 1998. An Introduction to Statistical Methods and Data Analysis. Third Edition,
  9. PWS-Kent Publishing Company. Zar, J. H., 1999. Biostatistical Analysis. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Inc. Simon and Schuster, A Viacom Company. Vorapongsathorn, T., Taejaroenkul, S., Viwatwongkasem, C., 2004. A Comparison of Type I Error and Power of Bartlett’s Test, Levene’s Test and Cochran’s Test Under Violation of Assumptions, 26 (4), 537-547.