SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Seyahat ve Otel İşletmeciliği Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 2

-

Otel İşletmelerinin İş Çevresi Özelliklerinin Kurum Kültürü Türleri Üzerindeki Etkisi

YUNUS EMRE TAŞGİT
ERCAN ERGÜN
MURAT BAYAT
Pages
92–120
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results, a significant relationship has been determined between diversity ve market culture; between environmental pressure, complexity ve hierarchy culture; between environmental dynamism ve adhocracy culture

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In the area of strategic management, business environment ve organizational cultures are regarded as the most important issues affecting the success of businesses.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Although these issues have received considerable attention ve reached a certain maturity in the international literature, they still have remained fairly shallow in the strategic management literature in Turkey.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results, a significant relationship has been determined between diversity ve market culture; between environmental pressure, complexity ve hierarchy culture; between environmental dynamism ve adhocracy culture
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:İş Çevresi · Kurum Kültürü · Hizmet Sektörü

Abstract

In the area of strategic management, business environment ve organizational cultures are regarded as the most important issues affecting the success of businesses. Although these issues have received considerable attention ve reached a certain maturity in the international literature, they still have remained fairly shallow in the strategic management literature in Turkey. In the research, it is intended to fill this gap in the literature by identifying with the impact of the business environment characteristics on organizational culture. Quantitative research method was used in the study ve data were obtained using the survey technique. According to the results, a significant relationship has been determined between diversity ve market culture; between environmental pressure, complexity ve hierarchy culture; between environmental dynamism ve adhocracy culture

Özet

İş çevresi ve kurum kültürü yönetim alanında işletmelerin başarısını etkileyen enönemli unsurlar arasında gösterilmektedir. Her iki konu arasındaki ilişki uluslararasıliteratürde gereken ilgiyi görmüş ve belirli bir olgunluğa ulaşmış olmasına rağmenTürkiye ölçeğinde oldukça sığ kalmıştır. Bu araştırma; iş çevresinin, kurum kültürüüzerindeki etkisini tespit ederek alan yazındaki bu boşluğu kapatmayıamaçlamaktadır. Nicel araştırma yöntemi ve anket tekniği kullanılarak verileri eldeedilen araştırmada ilgi çekici sonuçlara ulaşılmıştır. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre işçevresi özelliklerinden çeşitliliğin hâkim olduğu ortamlarda kurum kültürü olarak pazarkültürünün, çevresel baskı ve kompleksliğin egemen olduğu iş ortamlarında hiyerarşikültürünün ve dinamizmin baskın olduğu iş çevrelerinde ise adhokrasi kültürününtercih edildiği belirlenmiştir.Anahtar Kelimeler: İş Çevresi, Kurum Kültürü, Hizmet Sektörü, Otel İşletmeleri

🔖

Cite This Article

TAŞGİT, Y. E., ERGÜN, E., BAYAT, M. (2015). -. Seyahat ve Otel İşletmeciliği Dergisi, Cilt: 12 - Sayı: 2, 92–120. https://ajindex.com/articles/315164

References (10)

  1. Adler, P. S., Borys, B., (1996), “Two types of bureaucracy: Enabling and coercive”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 61–89.
  2. Adler, P. S., Goldoftas, B., Levine, D. I., (1999), “Flexibility versus efficiency? A case study of model changeovers in the Toyota production system”, Organization Science, 10, 43–68.
  3. Ahmad, N. H., Ramayah, T., Wilson, C., Kummerow, L., (2010), “Is entrepreneurial competency and business success relationship contingent upon business environment? A study of Malaysian SMEs”, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, 16 (3), 182-203.
  4. Alvesson, M., (2002), “Understanding organizational culture”, London: Sage. Appiah-Adu, K., Blankson, C., (1998), “Business Strategy, Organizational Culture, and Market Orientation”, Thunderbird International Business Review, 40 (3), -256. Appleby, R. C., (1991), “Modern Business Administration”, 5th Edition,
  5. Pıtman Publishing. Bateman T. S., Snell, S. A., (2002), “Management Competing in the New Era”, 5th Edition,
  6. McGraw-Hill Irwin. Belassi, W., Kondra, A. Z., Tukel, O. I., (2007), “New Product Development Projects: The Effects of Organizational Culture”, Project Management Journal, 38 (4), –24. Berson, Y., Oreg, S., Dvır, T., (2008), “CEO values, organizational culture and firm outcomes”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29, 615–633.
  7. Bourgeois, L. J., III. (1985), “Strategic goals, perceived uncertainty, and economic performance in volatile environments”, Academy of Management Journal, 28, –573. Brandenburger, A. M., Nalebuff, B. J., (1998), “Ortaklaşa Rekabet”, (Çev: Levent Cinemre), Scala yayıncılık. Burns, T., Stalker, G. M., (1961), “The management of innovation”. London: Tavistock. Büyüköztürk, Ş., (2006), “Sosyal Bilimler için Veri Analizi El Kitabı”, Pegem A Yayıncılık. Cameron, K., Quinn, R.E., (1999), “Diagnosing and Changing Organizational Culture: Based on the Competing Values Framework”, Addison-Wesley. Chan, A., (1997), “Corporate culture of a clan organization”, Management Decision, (2), 94–99.
  8. Chatman, J., Jehn, K. (1994), “Assessing the relationship between industry characteristics and organisational culture: how different can you be?”, Academy of Management Journal, 37 (3), 522-53.
  9. Cheung, S. O., Wong, P. S. P., Wu, A. W.Y., (2011), “Towards an organizational culture framework in construction”, International Journal of Project Management, 29 (1), 33-44.
  10. Chi, T., (2009), “Measurement of business environment characteristics in the US technical textile industry: