SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Seyahat ve Otel İşletmeciliği Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 3

Sustainable Development in Tourism Destinations: Research on Göynük Local Tourism Stakeholders

Turizm Destinasyonlarında Sürdürülebilir Gelişim: Göynük Yerel Turizm Paydaşları Üzerine Bir Araştırma

Serkan ŞENGÜL
İsa BAYHAN
Rahmi YÜCEL
Pages
489–505
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is also an important result that the stakeholders who are optimistic about Göynük's tourism future think that state support and incentives are very necessary for tourism development.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this study is to provide sustainability in tourism destinations, along with the development processes of applied tourism policies and tourism approaches.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Within the scope of the research, the opinions and evaluations of the local tourism stakeholders were examined in Göynük, which is located in the historical Silk Road Corridor and participated in the Citta Slow network.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is also an important result that the stakeholders who are optimistic about Göynük's tourism future think that state support and incentives are very necessary for tourism development.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to provide sustainability in tourism destinations, along with the development processes of applied tourism policies and tourism approaches. Within the scope of the research, the opinions and evaluations of the local tourism stakeholders were examined in Göynük, which is located in the historical Silk Road Corridor and participated in the Citta Slow network. In the study conducted in accordance with the qualitative research model, the semi- structured interview form was used to obtain the data. As a result of the study, it is seen that the features that distinguish Göynük from other destinations are spirituality, history and culture, calmness and peace. It is also an important result that the stakeholders who are optimistic about Göynük's tourism future think that state support and incentives are very necessary for tourism development.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı, turizm destinasyonlarında sürdürülebilirliğin sağlanabilmesi için uygulanan turizm politikaları ve turizm yaklaşımlarının gelişim süreçleriyle birlikte ortaya konulmasıdır. Araştırma kapsamında tarihi İpek Yolu Koridorunda bulunan ve Sakin Şehir (Citta Slow) ağına katılım sağlayan Göynük destinasyonunda yerel turizm paydaşlarının konuya ilişkin görüş ve değerlendirmeleri incelenmiştir. Nitel araştırma yönteminin uygulandığı çalışmada, verilerin elde edilmesinde yarı yapılandırılmış görüşme tekniği uygulanmıştır. Çalışma sonucunda Göynük’ü diğer destinasyonlardan ayıran öne çıkan özelliklerin maneviyat, tarih, kültür, sakinlik ve huzur olduğu görülmektedir. Göynük’ün turizm geleceği konusunda iyimser olan paydaşların turizm gelişimi açısından devlet destek ve teşviklerini oldukça gerekli gördükleri de ulaşılan önemli bir sonuçtur.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞENGÜL, S., BAYHAN, İ., YÜCEL, R. (2018). Sustainable Development in Tourism Destinations: Research on Göynük Local Tourism Stakeholders. Seyahat ve Otel İşletmeciliği Dergisi, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 3, 489–505. https://ajindex.com/articles/315063

References (13)

  1. Ayuso, S. (2007), „Comparing Voluntary Policy Instruments for Sustainable Tourism: the Experience of the Spanish Hotel Sector‟ Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 15(2), ss. 144-159.
  2. Bernard, L. (2005), „Sustainable Rural Tourism Strategies: A Tool for Development and Conservation‟ Interamerican Journal of Environment and Tourism, 1(1), ss. 12- 18. Briassoulis, H. (2002), „Sustainable Tourism and the Question of the Commons‟ Annals of Tourism Research, 29(4), ss. 1065-1085.
  3. Bogdan, R. C. ve Biklen, S. K. (1992), Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Methods, Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Boley, B. B., McGehee N. G. ve Hammet, A. L. T. (2017), „Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA) of Sustainable Tourism Initiatives: The Resident Perspective‟ Tourism Management, 58, ss. 66-77.
  4. Butler, R.W. (1980), „The Concept of A Tourist Area Cycle of Evalution: Implications for Management of Resources‟ Canadian Georapher, 24(1), ss. 5-12.
  5. Choi, H. C. ve Sirakaya, E. (2006), „Sustainability Indicators for Managing Community Tourism‟ Tourism Management, 27(6), ss. 1274-1289.
  6. Coccossis, H. (1996), „Tourism and Sustainability: Perspectives and Implications‟ içinde, G. K. Priestley, J. A. Edwards, H. Coccossiset (Editörler), Sustainable Tourism? European Experiences, U.K.: Cab International. Delgado, A. T. ve Palomeque, F. L. (2014), „Measuring Sustainable Tourism at The Municipal Level‟ Annals of Tourism Research, 49, ss. 122-137.
  7. Doxey, G. (1975), „A Causation Theory of Visitor-Resident Irritants: Methodology and Research Inferences‟ Travel and Tourism Research Association Sixth Annual Conference, San Diego, ss. 195-198.
  8. Dwyer, L. ve Kim, C. (2003). „Destination Competitiveness: Determinants and Indicators‟ Current Issues in Tourism 6(5), ss. 369–414.
  9. Fernandez, J. I. P., ve Sanchez Rivero, M. (2009), „Measuring Tourism Sustainability: Proposal for A Composite Index‟ Tourism Economics, 15(2), ss. 277-296.
  10. Font, X. ve Sallows, M. (2002), „Setting Global Sustainability Standards: The Sustainable Tourism Stewardship Council‟ Tourism Recreation Research, 27(1), ss. 21-31.
  11. Freeman, R. E. ve Reed, D. L. (1983), „Stockholders and Stakeholders: A new Perspective on Corporate Governance‟ California Management Review, 25(3), ss. 88-106.
  12. Garrod, B. ve Fyall, A. (1998), „Beyond the Rhetoric of Sustainable Tourism‟ Tourism Management, 19(3) ss. 199-212.
  13. Genç, K., Atay, L., ve Eryaman, M. Y. (2014), „Sürdürülebilir Destinasyon Yaratma Sürecinde Örgütlenmenin Önemi: Çan