Journals / Southern Clinics of Istanbul Eurasia / 2017 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 4

Efficacy and Safety of Prophylactic Intracameral Gatifloxacin Injection in Cataract Surgery: 1 Year Results

Pages
272–277
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Intracameral administration of 0.3 mg/0.1 mL gatifloxacin or 1 mg/0.1mL cefuroxime is effective and safe as endophthalmitis prophylaxis, given the statistically and clinically insignificant increase in CMT seen in both groups at the postoperative first month

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of an intracameral injection of gatifloxacin with cefuroxime as prophylaxis for endophthalmitis in cataract surgery.Methods: In this retrospective comparative case series, 41 eyes of 33 patients were separated into 2 groups.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In the first group, an intracameral injection of cefuroxime (1 mg/0.1mL) was administered to 18 eyes, and an intracameral injection of gatifloxacin (0.3 mg/0.1 mL) was administered to 23 eyes in the second group.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Intracameral administration of 0.3 mg/0.1 mL gatifloxacin or 1 mg/0.1mL cefuroxime is effective and safe as endophthalmitis prophylaxis, given the statistically and clinically insignificant increase in CMT seen in both groups at the postoperative first month
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of an intracameral injection of gatifloxacin with cefuroxime as prophylaxis for endophthalmitis in cataract surgery.Methods: In this retrospective comparative case series, 41 eyes of 33 patients were separated into 2 groups. In the first group, an intracameral injection of cefuroxime (1 mg/0.1mL) was administered to 18 eyes, and an intracameral injection of gatifloxacin (0.3 mg/0.1 mL) was administered to 23 eyes in the second group. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), endothelial cell density (CD), endothelial cell coefficient of variation (CV), and central macular thickness (CMT) were evaluated at baseline and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery.Results: No instance of acute/chronic endophthalmitis, cystoid macular edema, or bullous keratopathy was seen in any patient at the end of 1 year of follow-up. At postoperative month 1, a statistically significant increase in BCVA was seen in both groups, as well as a decrease in CD, and a statistically insignificant increase in CMT. However, the 2 groups were found statistically similar in terms of BCVA, CD, CV, and CMT values obtained in subsequent follow-ups (p>0.05).Conclusion: VA, CMT, and endothelial cell changes were similar in both the cefuroxime group and the gatifloxacin group. Intracameral administration of 0.3 mg/0.1 mL gatifloxacin or 1 mg/0.1mL cefuroxime is effective and safe as endophthalmitis prophylaxis, given the statistically and clinically insignificant increase in CMT seen in both groups at the postoperative first month

🔖

Cite This Article

PENBE, A., KARAGÖZ, I. K., ATAKAN, M., ÖZERTÜRK, Y. (2017). Efficacy and Safety of Prophylactic Intracameral Gatifloxacin Injection in Cataract Surgery: 1 Year Results. Southern Clinics of Istanbul Eurasia, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 4, 272–277. https://ajindex.com/articles/314569

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Taban M, Behrens A, Newcomb RL, Nobe MY, Saedi G, Sweet PM, et al. Acute endophthalmitis following cataract surgery: a systematic review of the literature. Arch Ophthalmol 2005;123:613–20
  2. Endophthalmitis Study Group, European Society of Cataract & Refractive Surgeons. Prophylaxis of postoperative endophthalmitis following cataract surgery: results of the ESCRS multicenter study and identification of risk factors. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007;33:978–88
  3. Barry P, Covdoves L, Gardner S. Katarakt Cerrahisi Sonrası Endoftalminin Önlenmesi ve Tedavisi için ESCRS Rehberleri. 1. baskı. Dublin: Temple Road; 2014. p. 2–31
  4. Chitkara DK, Manners T, Chapman F, Stoddart MG, Hill D, Jenkins D. Lack of effect of preoperative norfloxacin on bacterial contamination of anterior chamber aspirates after cataract surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 1994;78:772–4
  5. Lane SS, Osher RH, Masket S, Belani S. Evaluation of the safety of prophylactic intracameral moxifloxacin in cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008;34:1451–9
  6. O’Brien TP, Arshinoff SA, Mah FS. Perspectives on antibiotics for postoperative endophthalmitis prophylaxis: potential role of moxifloxacin. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007;33:1790–800
  7. Baillif S, Roure-Sobas C, Le-Duff F, Kodjikian L. Aqueous humor contamination during phacoemulsification in a university teaching hospital. J Fr Ophtalmol 2012;35:153–6
  8. Dickey JB, Thompson KD, Jay WM. Anterior chamber aspirate cultures after uncomplicated cataract surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 1991;112:278–82
  9. Liesegang TJ. Intracameral antibiotics: questions for the United States based on prospective studies. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008;34:505–9
  10. Tipperman R. Pharmacologic considerations for cataract surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2004;15:51–5
  11. Tan CS, Wong HK, Yang FP. Epidemiology of postoperative endophthalmitis in an Asian population: 11-year incidence and effect of intracameral antibiotic agents. J Cataract Refract Surg 2012;38:425–30
  12. Peyman G, Lee P, Seal DV. Endophthalmitis diagnosis and management. 1st ed. London: Taylor & Francis; 2004. p. 1–270
  13. Kanski JJ. Acute Bacterial Endophthalmitis. In: Clinical Ophthalmology. 6th ed. London; Butterworth-Heinemann; 2007. p. 354–9
  14. Montan PG, Wejde G, Setterquist H, Rylander M, Zetterström C. Prophylactic intracameral cefuroxime. Evaluation of safety and kinetics in cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002;28:982–7
  15. Barry P, Seal DV, Gettinby G, Lees F, Peterson M, Revie CW; ESCRS En