Journals / Southern Clinics of Istanbul Eurasia / 2021 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 1

Evaluation of Olfactory Fossa Anatomy by Computed Tomography and the Place of Keros Classification in Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery

Pages
47–52
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: The routine use of Keros classification for the left and right side in paranasal sinus CT reporting will help minimize surgical complications by providing valuable contributions to the surgical branches related to the anatomy of this region.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) is a frequently used treatment method, and it is important to know the anatomy of the paranasal sinuses, olfactory fossa and adjacent anatomical structures during surgery.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: In this study, the images of the patients who were directed by the otorhinolaryngology clinic and who underwent non-contrast paranasal sinus CT examination in the Radiology clinic between December 2018 and June 2019 were evaluated retrospectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: The routine use of Keros classification for the left and right side in paranasal sinus CT reporting will help minimize surgical complications by providing valuable contributions to the surgical branches related to the anatomy of this region.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2018 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: Functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) is a frequently used treatment method, and it is important to know the anatomy of the paranasal sinuses, olfactory fossa and adjacent anatomical structures during surgery. Paranasal sinus computed tomography (CT) is a frequently used imaging method in the evaluation of the paranasal sinuses, nasal cavity and nasopharynx. Our study aims to determine Keros types and their incidence by retrospectively evaluating the depth of the olfactory fossa in our population according to the Keros classification on paranasal sinus CT images. Methods: In this study, the images of the patients who were directed by the otorhinolaryngology clinic and who underwent non-contrast paranasal sinus CT examination in the Radiology clinic between December 2018 and June 2019 were evaluated retrospectively. As a result, 522 patients between the ages of 18 and 87 were included in our study. Results: The average depth of the total 1044 olfactory fossa (OF) examined was 4.89 mm with a standard deviation (SD) calculated of ±2.79. Statistically, a significant difference was found between males and females in mean OF depth (p<0.001). According to Keros classification, 322 sides (30.85%) had type 1, 697 sides (66.75%), type 2 and 25 sides (2.4%) had type 3 in 1044 olfactory fossa. To our knowledge, this study has the largest case series for the olfactory fossa in our country, and the data were obtained in a tertiary health center. Conclusion: The routine use of Keros classification for the left and right side in paranasal sinus CT reporting will help minimize surgical complications by providing valuable contributions to the surgical branches related to the anatomy of this region.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARATAY, E., AVCI, H. (2021). Evaluation of Olfactory Fossa Anatomy by Computed Tomography and the Place of Keros Classification in Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery. Southern Clinics of Istanbul Eurasia, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 1, 47–52. https://ajindex.com/articles/313951

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Zinreich SJ. Paranasal Sinus Imaging. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1990;103:863–9
  2. Som PM, Lawson W, Fatterpekar GM, Zinreich J. Embryology, Anatomy, physiology and imaging of the sinonasal cavities. In: Som PM, Curtin HD, editors. Head and neck imaging. 5th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier; 2011. p. 119–28
  3. Erdem G, Erdem T, Miman MC, Ozturan O. A radiological anatomic study of the cribriform plate compared with constant structures. Rhinology 2004;42:225–9
  4. Cashman EC, Macmahon PJ, Smyth D. Computed tomography scans of paranasal sinuses before functional endoscopic sinus surgery. World J Radiol 2011;3:199–204
  5. Salroo IN, Dar NH, Yousuf A, Lone KS. Computerised tomographic profile of ethmoid roof on basis of Keros classification among ethnic Kashmiri’s. Int J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2016;2:1–5
  6. McMains KC. Safety in endoscopic sinus surgery. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2008;16:247–51
  7. Keros P. On the practical value of differences in the level of the lamina cribrosa of the ethmoid. Z Laryngol Rhinol Otol 1962;41:809−13
  8. Jacob TG, Kaul JM. Morphology of the olfactory fossa – A new look. J Anatomic Soc India 2014;63:30–5
  9. Babu AC, Nair MRPB, Kuriakose AM. Olfactory fossa depth: CT analysis of 1200 patients. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2018;28:395
  10. Erdogan S, Keskin IG, Topdag M, Ozturk M, Sari F, Mutlu F. Ethmoid roof radiology; analysis of lateral lamella of cribriform plate. Otolaryngol Pol 2015;69:53−7
  11. Muñoz-Leija MA, Yamamoto-Ramos M, Barrera-Flores FJ, Treviño- González JL, Quiroga-Garza A, Méndez-Sáenz MA, et al. Anatomical variations of the ethmoidal roof: differences between men and women. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2018;275:1831–6
  12. V AM, Santosh B. A Study of Clinical Significance of the Depth of Olfactory Fossa in Patients Undergoing Endoscopic Sinus Surgery. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2017;69:514−22
  13. Yenigun A, Goktas SS, Dogan R, Eren SB, Ozturan O. A study of the anterior ethmoidal artery and a new classification of the ethmoid roof (Yenigun classification). Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2016;273:3759–64
  14. Kayalioglu G, Oyar O, Govsa F. Nasal cavity and paranasal sinus bony variations: a computed tomographic study. Rhinology 2000;38:108–13
  15. Zinreich SJ, Kennedy DW, Rosenbaum AE, Gayler BW, Kumar AJ, Stammberger H. Paranasal sinuses: CT imaging requirements for endoscopic surgery. Radiology 1987;163:769–75
  16. Skorek A, Tretiakow D, Szmuda T, Przewozny T. Is the Keros classification alone