SavedAdd your journal

Journals / İstanbul Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 1

Can The Institutional Theory Of Organizations Be Useful To Understand And Explain E-Government Applications?

Kurumsal Örgüt Kuramı E-Devlet Uygulamalarını Anlamak ve Açıklamak için Yararlı Olabilir mi?

Mete YILDIZ
Nadi LEBLEBİCİ
Pages
7–22
Publication Date
2018-05-14
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Institutional theory necessitates the incorporation of the boundedly-rational, social, and political aspects of decisionmaking, such as concerns of legitimacy, stability, and survival.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Studies about technologies used in the public administration system, more popularly known as e-government, has become an important topic of study in the discipline of public administration.
📊
Key Findings & Data:One way of analyzing the e-government phenomenon is by examining it from a rational viewpoint.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Institutional theory necessitates the incorporation of the boundedly-rational, social, and political aspects of decisionmaking, such as concerns of legitimacy, stability, and survival.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:E-Devlet · Örgüt Kuramı · Kurumsal Örgüt Kuramı

Abstract

Studies about technologies used in the public administration system, more popularly known as e-government, has become an important topic of study in the discipline of public administration. One way of analyzing the e-government phenomenon is by examining it from a rational viewpoint. An alternative way of analysis is to employ the institutional theory of organizations, which helps explain internal conformity to the rules and trends of the institutional environment. Institutional theory necessitates the incorporation of the boundedly-rational, social, and political aspects of decisionmaking, such as concerns of legitimacy, stability, and survival.

Özet

Kamu yönetimi sisteminde teknoloji kullanımı ile ilgili çalışmalar veya daha yaygın adıyla e-devlet, kamu yönetimi disiplininin önemli bir çalışma konusu haline gelmiştir. Bu makalede e-devlet alanındaki gelişmeleri incelemede ve anlamada kurumsal örgüt kuramı kullanımının getirdiği olanaklar, e-devlet alan yazınından örnekler yardımıyla ve bu yaklaşımın bazı kısıtlarına dikkat çekilerek ortaya konulmuştur. Varılan sonuç, e-devlet kavramı ve uygulaması hakkında yapılan analizlerde kurumsal örgüt kuramının, alan yazınında hâkim konumdaki yeni kamu işletmeciliği değerleri-odaklı bakış açısına ek olarak, toplumsal/örgütsel meşruiyet arayışları, simgesellik ve moda olma gibi farklı hususları da analize dâhil etmesi nedeniyle yararlı olabileceği yönündedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILDIZ, M., LEBLEBİCİ, N. (2018). Can The Institutional Theory Of Organizations Be Useful To Understand And Explain E-Government Applications?. İstanbul Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 1, 7–22. https://ajindex.com/articles/31391

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Anderson, L., & Bishop, P. (2005). E-Government to e-democracy: Communicative mechanisms of governance. Journal of E-Government, 2(1), 5–26.
  2. Bannister, F. (2007a). The perspective of Janus: Reflecting on EGPA past and future. Information Polity, 12, 227–231.
  3. Bannister, F. (2007b). The curse of the benchmark: An assessment of the validity and value of e-government comparisons. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 73(2), 171–188.
  4. Bertalanffy, L. V. (1968). General system theory: Foundations, development, applications. New York, NY: George Braziller Publishers.
  5. Bigelow, B., & Stone, M. M. (1995). Why don’t they do what they want: An exploration of organizational responses to institutional pressures in community health centers. Public Administration Review, 55(2), 183–192.
  6. Cohen, S., & Eimicke, W. (2001). The use of internet in government service delivery. In M. Abramson & G. E. Means (Eds.), E-Government 2001 (pp. 9–43).
  7. Oxford, UK: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
  8. Covaleski, M. A., & Dirsmith, M. W. (1988). An institutional perspective on the rise, social transformation and the fall of a university budget category. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33, 562–587.
  9. Demir, Ö. ve Acar, M. (1992). Sosyal bilimler sözlüğü. İstanbul:
  10. Ağaç Yayıncılık. DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 2, 147–160.
  11. Du, K., & Dai, Y. (2017). The doctrine of the mean: Reference groups and public information systems development. Journal of Strategic Information Systems. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2017.11.003
  12. Effah, J., & Nuhu, H. (2017). Institutional barriers to digitalization of government budgeting in developing countries: A case study of Ghana. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 82(1), 1–17.
  13. Flak, L. S., & Rose, J. (2005). Stakeholder governance: Adapting stakeholder theory to e-government. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 16, 642–664.
  14. Fountain, J. E., & Osorio-Urzua, C. A. (2001). Public sector: Early stages of a deep transformation. In R.E. Litan & A. M. Rivlin (Eds.), The economic payoff from the internet revolution (pp. 235–268). Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.
  15. Hassan, S., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2008). Institutional theory and e-government research. Handbook of Research on Public Information Technology, 1, 349–360.
  16. Heeks, R. (2005).