SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Southern Clinics of Istanbul Eurasia / 2017 / Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 2

Comparative Analysis of Minimally Invasive Microductectomy Versus Major Duct Excision in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Pathological Nipple Discharge

Ersin GÜNDOĞAN
LEVENT KAPTANOĞLU
Mehmet ESER
Kenan ÇETİN
NEJDET BİLDİK
Hasan Ediz SIKAR
METİN KEMENT
Muhammet Fikri KÜNDEŞ
Pages
87–92
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this study, the results of the 2 procedures were found to be similar

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The present study is a comparison of results in patients with pathological nipple discharge (PND) who underwent microductectomy and those who underwent major duct excision (MDE).Methods: This study included patients who underwent surgery in the clinic due to PND between October 2015 and October 2011.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the type of surgery (Group Micro and Group Major).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this study, the results of the 2 procedures were found to be similar
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: The present study is a comparison of results in patients with pathological nipple discharge (PND) who underwent microductectomy and those who underwent major duct excision (MDE).Methods: This study included patients who underwent surgery in the clinic due to PND between October 2015 and October 2011. Data were collected via retrospective chart review. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the type of surgery (Group Micro and Group Major). The demographic characteristics of the patients, the character of the discharge, preoperative imaging findings, preoperative cytological findings, postoperative pathological findings, and follow-up results were analyzed.Results: The records of a total of 78 patients were examined. Group Micro comprised 57 patients, and 21 were included in Group Major. The most frequently observed lesion in both groups was papillomatous lesion without atypia (Group Major: n=8, 38.1% and Group Micro: n=26, 45.6%). Premalignant lesion was detected in 17 patients (atypical ductal hyperplasia, papillomatous lesion with atypia, ductal carcinoma in situ, intraductal papillary carcinoma). Although the number of patients with a premalignant lesion in Group Major was greater than that seen in Group Minor, the difference was not significant (n=11, 19.3% and n=6, 28.6%, respectively; p=0.3).Conclusion: Conventional imaging and cytology techniques are usually insufficient in the diagnosis of PND. Therefore, surgery is frequently required in these patients. Microductectomy or MDE may be selected as the preferred surgical procedure. In this study, the results of the 2 procedures were found to be similar

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜNDOĞAN, E., KAPTANOĞLU, L., ESER, M., ÇETİN, K., BİLDİK, N., SIKAR, H. E., KEMENT, M., KÜNDEŞ, M. F. (2017). Comparative Analysis of Minimally Invasive Microductectomy Versus Major Duct Excision in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Pathological Nipple Discharge. Southern Clinics of Istanbul Eurasia, Cilt: 28 - Sayı: 2, 87–92. https://ajindex.com/articles/313555

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Paterok EM, Rosenthal H, Säbel M. Nipple discharge and abnormal galactogram. Results of a long-term study (1964-1990). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1993;50:227–34
  2. Leis HP Jr, Greene FL, Cammarata A, Hilfer SE. Nipple discharge: surgical significance. South Med J 1988;81:20–6
  3. Cabioglu N, Hunt KK, Singletary SE, Stephens TW, Marcy S, Meric F, et al. Surgical decision making and factors determining a diagnosis of breast carcinoma in women presenting with nipple discharge. J Am Coll Surg 2003;196:354–64
  4. Hussain AN, Policarpio C, Vincent MT. Evaluating nipple discharge. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2006;61:278–83
  5. Vargas HI, Vargas MP, Eldrageely K, Gonzalez KD, Khalkhali I. Outcomes of clinical and surgical assessment of women with pathological nipple discharge. Am Surg 2006;72:124–8
  6. Goksel HA, Yagmurdur MC, Demirhan B, Isiklar I, Karakayali H, Bilgin N, et al. Management strategies for patients with nipple discharge. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2005;390:52–8
  7. Dooley WC, Ljung BM, Veronesi U, Cazzaniga M, Elledge RM, O’Shaughnessy JA, et al. Ductal lavage for detection of cellular atypia in women at high risk for breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2001;93:1624–32
  8. Makita M, Sakamoto G, Akiyama F, Namba K, Sugano H, Kasumi F, et al. Duct endoscopy and endoscopic biopsy in the evaluation of nipple discharge. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1991;18:179–87
  9. Sauter ER, Schlatter L, Lininger J, Hewett JE. The association of bloody nipple discharge with breast pathology. Surgery 2004;136:780–5
  10. Khan SA, Mangat A, Rivers A, Revesz E, Susnik B, Hansen N. Office ductoscopy for surgical selection in women with pathologic nipple discharge. Ann Surg Oncol 2011;18:3785–90
  11. Dietz JR, Kim JA, Malycky JL, Levy L, Crowe J. Feasibility and Technical Considerations of Mammary Ductoscopy in Human Mastectomy Specimens. Breast J 2000;6:161–5
  12. Kamali S, Harman Kamali G, Akan A, Simşek S, Bender O. Use of ductoscopy as an additional diagnostic method and its applications in nipple discharge. Minerva Chir 2014;69:65–73
  13. Kalu ON, Chow C, Wheeler A, Kong C, Wapnir I. The diagnostic value of nipple discharge cytology: breast imaging complements predictive value of nipple discharge cytology. J Surg Oncol 2012;106:381–5
  14. Ohlinger R, Stomps A, Paepke S, Blohmer JU, Grunwald S, Hahndorf W, et al. Ductoscopic detection of intraductal lesions in cases of pathologic nipple discharge in comparison with standard diagnostics: the German multicenter study. Oncol Res Tr