Journals / SSK Tepecik Eğitim Hastanesi Dergisi / 2004 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 2

Primary repair of penetrating stab wounds of the colon; is it safe?

Kesici delici aletlerle oluşan kolon yaralanmalarında primer tamir güvenli midir?

Pages
109–113
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: We conclude that, if technically possible, all penetrating stab wounds of colon can be managed with primary repair.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Stab wounds of the colon are usually mild injuries and can be managed safely with early primary repair.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The purpose of this study was to evaluate the septic complications in penetrating colon injuries and leak rate managed with primary repair.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: We conclude that, if technically possible, all penetrating stab wounds of colon can be managed with primary repair.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2003 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Geriyedönük çalışma · Ameliyat sonrası komplikasyonlar · Kolon

Abstract

Aim: Stab wounds of the colon are usually mild injuries and can be managed safely with early primary repair. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the septic complications in penetrating colon injuries and leak rate managed with primary repair. Methods: In this retrospective study, we evaluated 38 patients who had penetrating stab wounds of the colon in our clinic between 1998 and 2003. Location of colonic injury was cecum in 3 (7.9%), ascenden colon in 4 (10.5%), transverse colon in 18 (47.4%), descenden colon in 6 (15.8%), sigmoid colon in 6 (15.8%) and multible sites in 1 (2.6%) patient. We performed primary repaires in 33 (86.8%), partial resection and colostomy with Hartman prosedure in 1 (2.6%) and only colostomy from injuried side in 4 (10.5%) of 38 patients.Results: The most common postoperative complication was wound infection (10.5%) and leakage of the anastomosis was not observed. The hospital stay after primary repair was shorter than after colostomy -excluding colostomy closure time-. Conclusion: We conclude that, if technically possible, all penetrating stab wounds of colon can be managed with primary repair.

Özet

Amaç: Kolonun kesici delici aletlerle yaralanmaları genellikle orta şiddette olan yaralanmalardır ve erken yapılan primer tamir ile güvenle tedavi edilebilirler. Çalışmanın amacı kesici dilici aletlere bağlı penetran kolon yaralanmalarındaki septik komplikasyon oranlarını ortaya koymak ve primer tamir yapılan hastalardaki anastomoz kaçağı oranını belirlemektir. Yöntem: Bu retrospektif çalışmada 1998-2003 yılları arasında hastanemiz 4. Genel Cerrahi Kliniğinde kesici delici alete bağlı kolon yaralanması olan 38 olgu değerlendirildi. Lokalizasyon olarak 3 (%7.9) olguda çekum, 4 (%10.5) olguda çıkan kolon, 18 (%47.4) olguda transvers kolon, 6 (%15.8) olguda inen kolon ve 6 (%15.8) olguda sigmoid kolon yaralanması saptanırken 1 (%2.6) olguda kolonun birden fazla alanında yaralanma olduğu görüldü. 38 olgunun 33 (%86.8)’üne primer tamir, birine (%2.6) rezeksiyon ile birlikte Hartmann prosedürlü kolostomi ve 4 (%10.5) ’üne yaralanma yerinden kolostomi uygulandı. Bulgular: En sık görülen postoperatif komplikasyon yara enfeksiyonu idi (%10.5) ve hiçbir olguda anastomoz kaçağı gözlenmedi. Primer tamirden sonraki hastanede kalış süresi, kolostomi açılan hastalara göre - kolostomi kapatılması süresi hariç - daha kısa bulundu. Sonuç : Teknik olarak mümkün ise kesici delici aletlere bağlı tüm kolon yaralanmalarının primer tamir ile tedavi edilmesini önermekteyiz.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÜNALP, H. R., ÖNA, M. A., PEŞKERSOY, M., AKGÜNER, T., KAMER, E., ÖZZEYBEK, T. (2004). Primary repair of penetrating stab wounds of the colon; is it safe?. SSK Tepecik Eğitim Hastanesi Dergisi, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 2, 109–113. https://ajindex.com/articles/312830

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Frame SB, Ridgeway CA, Rice JC, McSwain NE Jr, Kerstein MD. Penetrating injuries to the colon: analysis by anatomic region of injury. South Med J 1989;82:1099-102
  2. Bowley DM, Boffard KD, Goosen J, Bebington BD, Plani F. Evolving concepts in the management of colonic injury. Injury 2001;32:433-4
  3. Leppaniemi A, Karppinen K, Haapiainen R. Stab wounds of the colon. Ann Chir Gynaecol 1994;83: 26-9
  4. Jacobson LE, Gomez GA, Broadie TA. Primary repair of 58 consecutive penetrating injuries of the colon: should colostomy be abandoned? Am Surg 1997;63:170-7
  5. Sasaki LS, Mittal V, Allaben RD. Primary repair of colon injuries: a retrospective analysis. Am Surg 1994;60:522-7
  6. Chappuis CW, Frey DJ, Dietzen CD, Panetta TP, Buechter KJ, Cohn I Jr. Management of penetrating colon injuries. A prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg1991;213:492-7 7. Gonzalez RP, Falimirski ME, Holevar MR. Further evaluation of colostomy in penetrating colon injury. Am Surg 2000;66:342-6;discussion 346-7
  7. Nallathambi MN, Ivatury RR, Shah PM, Rao PM, Rohman M, Stahl WM. Penetrating right colon trauma. The ever diminishing role for colostomy. Am Surg 1987;53:209-14
  8. Mihmanli M, Erzurumlu K, Guney M. Primary repairing in penetrating colon injuries. Hepatogastroenterology 1996;43:819-22
  9. Ünalp H.R, Akgüner T, Kamer E, Peşkersoy M, Önal M.A. Kesici delici aletlere bağlı penetran abdominal yaralanmalarda selektif non-operatif yaklaşı mın değerlendirilmesi: retrospektif bir çalışma. SSK Tepecik Eğitim Hastanesi Dergisi 2003;13: 137-42
  10. Chanson C, Nassiopoulos K, Kiesler P, Petropoulos P. Trauma to the colon in civilian surgery. Swiss Surg 1998;5:244-8
  11. Bulger EM, McMahon K, Jurkovich GJ. The morbidity of penetrating colon injury. Injury 2003;34:41-6
  12. Gonzalez RP, Merlotti GJ, Holevar MR. Colostomy in penetrating colon injury: is it necessary?J Trauma 1996;41:271-5
  13. Nallathambi MN, Ivatury RR, Rohman M, Stahl WM. Penetrating colon injuries: exteriorized repair vs. loop colostomy. J Trauma 1987;27:876-82.