Journals / Su Ürünleri Dergisi / 2006 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 1

The dependence on the use of live feed organisms is a major drawback for the extensive use of microparticulate diets in the mass culture of marine fish larvae

Balık larvalarının beslenmesinde kullanılan mikropartikül yemler ve potansiyelleri

Pages
275–278
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The characterization of limitations and potentials of microparticulate diets may help to solve such problems and will be a major footstep towards developing novel microparticulate diets that would support the growth and survival offish larvae.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The dependence on the use of live feed organisms is a major drawback for the extensive use of microparticulate diets in the mass culture of marine Fish larvae.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The major reason for this dependence is the lack of effective microparticulate diets that are comparable to live feed organisms.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The characterization of limitations and potentials of microparticulate diets may help to solve such problems and will be a major footstep towards developing novel microparticulate diets that would support the growth and survival offish larvae.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:balık beslenmesi · diyetler · deneysel diyetler

Abstract

The dependence on the use of live feed organisms is a major drawback for the extensive use of microparticulate diets in the mass culture of marine Fish larvae. The major reason for this dependence is the lack of effective microparticulate diets that are comparable to live feed organisms. Major problems associated with artificial larval diets stem from physical characteristics such as size, color, density and hardness of the particles, the acceptability of diets by larvae and their digestibility. Water-soluble nutrients leach out of microbound particles and Cross-Linked Protein-Walled Capsules within couple of minutes. Lipid-Walled Microcapsules, on the other hand, retain water soluble nutrients such as amino acids effectively, but their physical properties are not suitable for larval feeding. The characterization of limitations and potentials of microparticulate diets may help to solve such problems and will be a major footstep towards developing novel microparticulate diets that would support the growth and survival offish larvae.

Özet

Deniz balıkları üretiminde, larvaları canlı yemlerle besleme bağımlılığı, suni larva yemlerinin yaygın bir şekilde kullanımını engellemektedir. Bu bağımlılığın en önemli nedeni canlı yem kalitesinde formüle edilmiş bir mikropartikül yemin henüz geliştirilememiş olmasıdır. Mikropartikül yemler ile ilgili başlıca problemler yemlerin ebadı, rengi, yoğunluğu ve sertliği gibi fiziksel faktörlerden, içerdikleri besin maddelerinin suya sızmalarından, yemlerin balık larvaları tarafından kabul edilebilirliğinden ve sindirilebiliriiğinden kaynaklanmaktadır. Mikrobağ partiküller ve Çapraz-Bağlı Protein-Duvariı kapsüller, suda çözünen besin maddelerini çok kısa bir süre içerisinde suya sızdırırlar. Lipid Duvarlı Mikrokapsüller ise amino asitler gibi, düşük moleküler ağırlıklı besin maddelerini çok daha etkin bir şekilde tutabilirler ancak fiziksel özellikleri larval besleme için uygun değildir. Larval yemlerin üretimi sınırlayıcı özelliklerinin ve kapasitelerinin belirlenmesi, bu sorunların giderilmesini ve larvaların büyüme ve hayatta kalmalarını destekleyecek yeni mikropartikül yemlerin geliştirilebilmesini sağlayabilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖNAL, U. (2006). The dependence on the use of live feed organisms is a major drawback for the extensive use of microparticulate diets in the mass culture of marine fish larvae. Su Ürünleri Dergisi, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 1, 275–278. https://ajindex.com/articles/312017

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Backhurst, J.R., Harker, J.H. 1988. The settling rates of larval feeds. Aquacultural Engineering, 7:363-366.
  2. Baskerville-Bridges, B., Kling, L. J. 2000. Development and evaluation of microparticulate diets for early weaning of Atlantic cod, Gadus morhua, larvae. Aquaculture Nutrition, 6:171-182.
  3. Buchal, M. A., Langdon, C. J. 1998. Evaluation of lipid spray beads for the delivery of water-soluble materials to a marine suspension-feeder, the Manila clam, Tapes philippinarum (Deshayes 1853). Aquaculture Nutrition, 4:263-274.
  4. Cahu, C. L, J.L. Zambonino Infante, A. Peres, P. Quazuguel, and M.M. Le Gall, 1998.
  5. Algal addition in seabass, Dicentrarchus labrax, larvae rearing: effect on digestive enzymes. Aquaculture, 161:109-119.
  6. Fernandez-Diaz, C, E. Pascual, and M. Yufera. 1994. Feeding behavior and prey size selection of gilthead seabream, Sparus aurata, larvae fed on nert and live food. Marine Biology, 118:323-328.
  7. Jones, DA; J.G., Munford, and P.A. Gabbott, 1974. Microcapsules as artificial food particles for aquatic filter feeders. Nature, 247:233-235.
  8. Kanazawa, A., S. Teshima, S. Inamori, S. Sumida, and T. Iwashita. 1982. Rearing of larval red sea bream and ayu with artificial diets. Mem. Fac. Fish., Kagoshima University, 31:185-192.
  9. Kissil, W. G. 1985. Overview: rearing larval stages of marine fish on artificial diets. Israel Journal of Zoology, 13:154-160.
  10. Kolkovski, S., W. Koven, and A. Tandler. 1997. The mode of action of Artemia in enhancing utilizationof microdiet by gilthead seabream, Sparus aurata, larvae. Aquaculture, 155:193-205.
  11. Koven, W., Y. Barr, E. Hadas, I. Ben-Atia, Y. Chen, R. Weiss, and A. Tandler. 1999. The potential of liposomes as a nutrient supplement in first-feeding marine fish larvae. Aquaculture Nutrition, 5:251-256.
  12. Koven, W., S. Kolkovski, E. Hadas, K. Gamsiz, and A. Tandler. 2001. Advances in the development of microdiets for gilthead seabream, Sparus aurata: a review. Aquaculture, 194:107-121.
  13. Langdon, C.J. 2003. Microparticle types for delivering nutrients to marine fish larvae. Aquaculture, 227:259-275.
  14. Le Ruyet, J.P., J.C. Alexandre, L. Thebaud, and C. Mugnier. 1993. Marine fish larvae feeding: formulated diets or live prey? J. World Aquaculture. Soc, 24:211-224.
  15. Lopez-Alvarado, J., C.J. Langdon, S. Teshima, and A. Kanazawa. 1994. Effects of coating and encapsulation of crystalline amino acids on leaching in larval feeds. Aquaculture, 122:335-346.
  16. Ostrowski, A.C. 1989. Effect of rearing tank background color on early surviva