Journals / Eurasian Journal of Educational Research / 2017 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 71

The Effect of the Critical Literacy Approach on Pre-service Language Teachers’ Critical Reading Skills

Pages
159–174
Publication Date
2017-09-20
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It indicated that the critical literacy approach had a significant effect on critical reading skills, which include interpretation, analysis, making an inference, evaluation, explanation, and self-regulation.Implications for Research and Practice: Based on the results of the research, it can be concluded that the critical literacy approach was effective in improving the students’ critical reading skills.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: This study aimed to measure the effect of the critical literacy approach on pre-service language teachers’ critical reading skills.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The critical reading skills measured consisted of six levels: interpretation, analysis, inference, evaluation, explanation, and self-regulation.Research Methods: This study was designed as a quasi-experiment which involved 56 pre-service teachers studying at the Indonesian Language Teaching Department, Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It indicated that the critical literacy approach had a significant effect on critical reading skills, which include interpretation, analysis, making an inference, evaluation, explanation, and self-regulation.Implications for Research and Practice: Based on the results of the research, it can be concluded that the critical literacy approach was effective in improving the students’ critical reading skills.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:teaching reading critical thinking critical awareness language skills

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to measure the effect of the critical literacy approach on pre-service language teachers’ critical reading skills. The critical reading skills measured consisted of six levels: interpretation, analysis, inference, evaluation, explanation, and self-regulation.Research Methods: This study was designed as a quasi-experiment which involved 56 pre-service teachers studying at the Indonesian Language Teaching Department, Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia. Research data was collected using a critical reading test. Prior to the study, a package of instructional materials was developed for the experimental group. Data was analyzed with descriptive statistics and ANCOVA test with pretest scores as the covariate. Significance level was determined at = .05.Findings: The results of the study indicated that the critical literacy approach had a significant effect on the pre-service language teachers’ critical reading skills. The experimental group achieved better at critical reading skills and reached higher post-test scores on average. It indicated that the critical literacy approach had a significant effect on critical reading skills, which include interpretation, analysis, making an inference, evaluation, explanation, and self-regulation.Implications for Research and Practice: Based on the results of the research, it can be concluded that the critical literacy approach was effective in improving the students’ critical reading skills. These findings suggest that the process of reading a text critically from the domination perspective can develop students’ critical thinking. Future research could possibly discuss the results of a test conducted to investigate the effectiveness of the critical literacy approach based on gender variables, cognitive ability levels, and reading habit.

🔖

Cite This Article

SULTAN, S., ROFIUDDIN, A., NURHADI, N., PRIYATNI4, E. T. (2017). The Effect of the Critical Literacy Approach on Pre-service Language Teachers’ Critical Reading Skills. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 71, 159–174. https://ajindex.com/articles/31154

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. Ali, S. (2011). Critical language awareness in pedagogic context. English Language Teaching, 4(4), 28–35. doi:10.5539/elt.v4n4p28 Barnet, S. & Bedau, H. (2011). Critical thinking, reading, and writing. Boston & New York: Bedford/St. Martin’s. Bharuthram, S. (2012). Making a case for the teaching of reading across the curriculum in higher education. South African Journal of Education, 32, 205–214.
  2. Dimitrov, D. M., & Rumrill Jr, P. D. (2003). Pretest-posttest designs and measurement of change. Work, 20(2), 159–165.
  3. Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction. Fullerton: California State University. Facione, P. A. (2013). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts (Fifth edition). California: Measurment Reason LCC and Insight Assessment. Facione, P. A. (2015). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts (Sixth edition). California: Measurment Reason LCC and Insight Assessment. Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. New York: Longman. Flemming, L. (2012). Reading for thinking. Boston: Wadswort. Gillet, J. W. & Temple, C. (1994). Understanding reading problemns: Assessment and instruction. New York: HarperCollins College Publisher.
  4. Greiff, S., Niepel, C., & Wustenberg, C. (2015). 21st century skill: International advancements and recent developments. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 18, 1–3. doi:10.1016/j.tsc.2015.04.007 Gustine, G. G. (2014). Critical literacy in an indonesian EFL setting: Sustaining professional learning (Doctoral thesis, Deakin University). Retrieved from http://dro.deakin.edu.au/eserv/DU:30067332/gustine-critical-2014.pdf.
  5. Hood, S. (1998). Critical literacy: What does it mean in theory and practice? Sydney: National Centre for English Language Teaching, Macquarie University. Huang, S. Y. (2011). Reading “further and beyond the text”: Student perspectives of critical literacy in EFL reading and writing. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 55(2), 145–154. doi:10.1002/JAAL.00017 Huijie, L. (2010). Developing a hierarchial framework of critical reading profiency. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 33(6), 40–54. Retrieved from http://www.celea.org.cn/teic/94/3.pdf
  6. Izadinia, M & Abednia, A. (2010). Dynamics of an EFL Reading Course with a Critical Literacy Orientation. Journal of Language and Literacy Education, 6 (2), 51 ̶ 67. Johnson, E. B. (2002). Contextual teaching and learning: What it is and why it’s here to stay. California: Corwin Pr