Journals / Su Ürünleri Dergisi / 2006 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 3

Gediz Nehri Deltası (Batı Türkiye) sedimentlerinde ağır metal birikimi

Heavy Metal Deposition in Sediments from the delta of the Gediz River (Western Turkey): A preliminary study

Pages
445–448
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results, it can be concluded that there is no pollution risk for As, Cu, Cd, Co, Ni and Pb.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The Gediz River is of great importance for agriculture in the region as well as its delta being an extensive wetland, qualified as an Important Bird Area by the WWF.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Besides this, the delta has been protected as a Ramsar site since 1998.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results, it can be concluded that there is no pollution risk for As, Cu, Cd, Co, Ni and Pb.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:ağır metaller · kirlilik · Türkiye

Abstract

The Gediz River is of great importance for agriculture in the region as well as its delta being an extensive wetland, qualified as an Important Bird Area by the WWF. Besides this, the delta has been protected as a Ramsar site since 1998. On the other hand it has been reported that the river is heavily polluted by agricultural, domestic and industrial discharges. In this preliminary investigation the deposition of some heavy metals (As, Pb, Cd, Ni, Cu, Co and Cr) in sediments of the delta was analyzed to estimate the effect of pollution. According to the results, it can be concluded that there is no pollution risk for As, Cu, Cd, Co, Ni and Pb. However, a high Cr content (2565.5 ppm maximum) was detected especially at station 2 and 3, where the wastewater of the leather industry was discharged into the channel connected to station 2, even though the plant has a treatment system.

Özet

Bir Ön Çalışma: Gediz Nehri bölgede tarımsal açıdan önemli olduğu kadar deltası da Dünya Doğal Yaşamı Koruma Federasyonu tarafından Önemli Kuş sahası olarak değerlendirilmiştir. Bunun yanı sıra, Gediz Deltası 1998 yılından beri Ramsar alanı olarak koruma altındadır. Öte yandan Gediz Nehri’nin tarımsal, evsel ve endüstriyel atıklar ile yoğun bir şekilde kirlendiği rapor edilmektedir. Bu ön araştırmada Gediz Deltasından toplanmış sediment örneklerinde bazı ağır metaller (As, Pb, Cd, Ni, Cu, Co ve Cr) analiz edilerek kirliliğin etkisi tayin edilmeye çalışılmıştır. Elde edilen sonuçlara göre, As, Cu, Cd, Co, Ni ve Pb için bir kirlilik riski olmadığı sonucuna varılabilir. Bununla beraber, arıtma tesisi olmasına rağmen özellikle deri sanayinin atık sularının döküldüğü kanalın birleştiği yer olan istasyon 2 ve 3’de yüksek Cr içeriği saptanmıştır (2565.5 ppm maksimum).

🔖

Cite This Article

PARLAK, H., ÇAKIR, A., BOYACIOĞLU, M., ARSLAN, Ö. Ç. (2006). Gediz Nehri Deltası (Batı Türkiye) sedimentlerinde ağır metal birikimi. Su Ürünleri Dergisi, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 3, 445–448. https://ajindex.com/articles/311498

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Akcay H., A. Oguz., C. Karapire. 2003. Study of heavy metal pollution and speciation in Buyuk Menderes and Gediz River sediments. Water Research 37: 813-822. Anonymous 1998. The Ramsar Convention on Wetlands. The Annotated Ramsar List: Turkey. http: //www.wetlands. org/ RDB/ Ramsar_Dir /Turkey/ tr009D02.pdf 8.02.2003 and http:// www. ramsar. org/ profiles_ turkey.htm Anonymous 1991. Analytical Techniques in Environmental Chemistry. Pergamon Series on Environmental Science, 3:615-618. Anonymous 2003. Sediment quality chemical criteria. Washington State Dept of Ecology, Toxic Cleanup programme. 9.01.2003. http:// www. ecy.wa.gov/ programs/tcp/smu/sed_chem.htm Dauvalter V., S.Rognerud. 2001. Heavy metal pollution in Sediments of the Pasvik River drainage. Chemosphere 42:9-18.
  2. Elmaci O.L., S. Delibacak, M.Secer, A. Bodur.2002. Fertility status, trace elements and heavy metal pollution of agricultural land irrigated from the Gediz River. Int.J.Wat. 2, 2/3:184-194. Ermert A. 2003. Turkey goes to court to protect Gediz Delta. http:/ /www. panda. org/ about_ wwf/ what_we _do/freshwater /news /news. cfm? uNews ID=5322 9.Jan.2003.
  3. Facetti, J., V.M. Dekov, R. Van Grieken. 1998. Heavy metals in sediments from the Paraguay River: a preliminary study. The Sci. of the Tot. Environ.209: 79-86.
  4. Kucuksezgin, F., B.Caglar, O.Uslu, 1999. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in red mullet (Mullus barbatus) and sediments from the Eastern Aegean Sea. Toxicol.Environ. Chem. 73:247-256
  5. Kucuksezgin, F.2001. Distribution of heavy metals in the surficial sediments of Izmir Bay (Turkey). Toxicol.Environ.Chem. 80:203-207.
  6. Liua, W.X., X.D. Lia, Z.G. Shena., D.C. Wanga., O.W.H. Waia., Y.S. Lia. 2003. Multivariate statistical study of heavy metal enrichment in sediments of the Pearl River Estuary. Environmental Pollution 121:377–388.
  7. Long, E. R., D. D. Macdonald, S. L. Smith, F. D. Calder. 1995. Incidence of adverse biological effects within ranges of chemical concentrations in marine and estuarine sediments. Environm. Management 19(1), pp 81-97.
  8. Molisani, M. M., M. S. M. B. Salomão., A. R. C. OvalIe., C. E. Rezende., L. D. Lacerda., C. E. V. Carvalho.1999. Heavy Metals in Sediments of the Lower Paraíba do Sul River and Estuary, R.J., Brazil. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 63:682-690.
  9. Egemen, E., U.Sunlu, A.Kaymakçı. 1998. Heavy metal concentrations in some molluscs and in surficial sediments from Izmir Bay/Turkey. 35th CİESM Congress Proceedings, Dubrovnik (Croatie), 35(1), 250-251. Ph