SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Su Ürünleri Dergisi / 2007 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 1

Determination methods of growth performance in fish feeding

Balık beslemede gelişim performansının izlenme yöntemleri

ALİ YILDIRIM KORKUT
AYSUN KOP
NİDA DEMİRTAŞ EROL
Aykut CİHANER
Pages
201–205
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this study, methods, which allow monitoring growth in fish feeding, was examined.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Determination methods of growth performance in fish feeding.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Having the best growth performance for an animal is the main aim of the aquaculture.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this study, methods, which allow monitoring growth in fish feeding, was examined.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:büyüme performansı · biyolojik gelişim · balık beslenmesi

Abstract

Determination methods of growth performance in fish feeding. Idea of making optimum of the growth, which is the main aim of the production, is being important in aquaculture, which has a great importance in recent years. Having the best growth performance for an animal is the main aim of the aquaculture. So, monitoring of the growth of the animals in every stage will give us information about growth performance of them and it allows us to determinate feeding strategies according to this performance. In this study, methods, which allow monitoring growth in fish feeding, was examined.

Özet

Son yıllarda önemi giderek artan su ürünleri yetiştiriciliğinde, üretimin temel amacı olan büyümenin, optimum değerlere taşınması düşüncesi de önem kazanmaktadır. Şüphesiz canlının en iyi şekilde büyümesini sağlamak yetiştiricilikte ana amaçtır. Bu nedenle yetiştiriciliği yapılan türlerin gelişim düzeylerinin her aşamasının izlenmesi, bizlere balıkların büyüme performansları hakkında bilgi verecek ve bu performanslara göre besleme stratejileri belirlememize olanak sağlayacaktır. Bu çalışmada balık beslemede gelişimin izlenmesini sağlayan yöntemler incelenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KORKUT, A. Y., KOP, A., EROL, N. D., CİHANER, A. (2007). Determination methods of growth performance in fish feeding. Su Ürünleri Dergisi, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 1, 201–205. https://ajindex.com/articles/311413

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (5)

  1. Aquamedia. _____http:// www. feap. info/ home/ FAQ/ Answers/ ans8 _en.asp, (December>, 28, 2006).
  2. Barnham C., A. Baxter. 1998.
  3. Condition Factor, K, For Salmonid Fish, Fisheries Note, State of Victoria, Department of Primary Industries, Pg. 1. Bureau P.D., J.D. Bevan and C.Y. Cho. 2001. Towards More Rational Feeding Practices, Pg. 1-7, Fish Nutrition Research Laboratory Dept. OfAnimal and Poultry Science, University of Guelph. Cheng Chang A., C. Chen Yung., C. Liou Hwa and C. Chang Fıng. 2005. Effect of Dietary Protein and Lipids on Blood Parameters and Superoxide Anion Production in the Grouper, Epinephelus coioides (Serranidae: Epinephalinae), Pg. 2- 23, Depertmant of Aquaculture, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung, Taiwan. De Silva S.S. 2001. A Global Perspective of Aquaculture in The New Millennium. In R.P. Subasinghe et all, (Eds.), Aquaculture in The Third Milleennium. Pp. 431- 459. NACA, Bankok, Thailand, and FAO, Rome, Italy. Halver J. and W.R Hardy. 2002. Fish Nutrition,Academic Press.,Elsevier Science, Third Edition, 417-423,
  4. USA. Hoşsu B., A.Y. Korkut., A. Fırat. 2003. Balık Besleme ve Yem Teknolojisi I ( Balık Besleme Fizyolojisi ve Biyokimyası, 3. Baskı,
  5. Ege Üni., Su Ürünleri Fak. Yay. İzci, L., M. Kuşat. 2006. Eğirdir Gölü Sudakları (Sander lucioperca(L., 1758))’ nın Bazı Populasyon Özellikleri, Süleyman Demirel Üni., Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 10-2, 167-172. Jobling M. 2003. The Thermal Growth Coefficient Model of Fish Growth: A Cautionary Note, NFH University of Tromso, Norway, Aquaculture Research, 581-584. Kaushik J.S. 1998. Nutritional Bioenergetics and Estimation of Waste Production In Non- Salmonids, Pg. 1- 7, Fish Nutrition Laboratory Inra- Ifremer, France. Lizama M. De los A.P., M.A. Ambrosio. 2002. Condition Factor in Nine Species of Fish of The Characidae Family In The Upper Parana Lİver Floodplain, Pg. 1- 12, Brasil. Programa de Pos-graduaçao em Ecologia de Ambientes Aquaticos Continentais, Universidade Estadual de Maringa, Parana, Brasil. Martínez A.M., B.P.C. Vázquez. 2001. Centro Interdisciplinario de Ciencias Marinas, México,Reproductive activity and condition index of Holacanthus passer (Teleostei:Pomacanthidae) in the Gulf of California, Mexico, Pg.1-3, Centro Interdisciplinario De Ciencias Marinas, Mexico. Metailler, R. 1986. Experimentation in Nutrition. (FAO 1986), (Ed; Bruno, A., MEDRAP), Nutrition in Marine Aquaculture, Pg. 1- 11, Lisbon. Nunes, D.M., M.S. Hartz. 2001. Feeding Dynamics and Ecomorphology of