Journals / Su Ürünleri Dergisi / 2007 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 1

Live transport of gravid penaeid shrimp (Marsupenaeus japonicus bate, 1888 and penaeus semisulcatus de Hann, 1884) broodstock with two different methods

Yumurtalı penaeid karides (Marsupenaeus Bate, 1888 ve penaeus semisulcatus de Hann, 1844) anaçlarının iki farklı yöntem ile canlı nakli

Pages
109–112
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

There was no significant (P < 0.05) difference between each density and two species.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Live transport of gravid penaeid shrimp (Marsupenaeus japonicus Bate, 1888 and Penaeus semisulcatus de Hann, 1844) broodstock with two different methods.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, live transport of gravid Marsupenaeus japonicus and Penaeus semisulcatus broodstock were tested in open tank at a density of 20 broodstock/100 L and at three different stocking densities (3, 4, and 5 broodstock 5 L-1) in double polyethylene bags held in styrofoam boxes (40x50x30 cm) within 12 hours.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:There was no significant (P < 0.05) difference between each density and two species.
🔬Design:Lab & Field Experiment
📍Scope:20 broodstock
⚙️Variables:karides · yaşayabilme · Penaeus semisulcatus

Abstract

Live transport of gravid penaeid shrimp (Marsupenaeus japonicus Bate, 1888 and Penaeus semisulcatus de Hann, 1844) broodstock with two different methods. Correct and consistent transportation of Penaeid shrimp broodstock is an important factor to supply stress-free quality broodstock and for healthy hatchery postlarvae output. In this study, live transport of gravid Marsupenaeus japonicus and Penaeus semisulcatus broodstock were tested in open tank at a density of 20 broodstock/100 L and at three different stocking densities (3, 4, and 5 broodstock 5 L-1) in double polyethylene bags held in styrofoam boxes (40x50x30 cm) within 12 hours. After transportation in open tank system, the rate of survival and absorption of eggs for M. japonicus were 90% and 17%, while these figures for P. semisulcatus were 75% and 40%. As the stocking density increased, the dissolved oxygen concentration and pH decreased in both species in polyethylene bags transportation. Although survival rate was recorded as 100% and absorption of eggs rate was lower at densities 3 and 4 broodstock 5 L-1 in comparison with that of 5 broodstock 5 L-1. There was no significant (P < 0.05) difference between each density and two species.

Özet

Penaeid karides anaçlarının doğru ve uygun nakli, stresten uzak kaliteli anaç temini ve sağlıklı kuluçkahane postlarva üretiminde önemli bir faktördür. Bu çalışmada, yumurtalı Marsupenaeus japonicus ve Penaeus semisulcatus anaçlarının açık tanklarda 20 anaç/100 lt yoğunluğunda ve çift polietilen torbalarda strafor kutular (40x50x30 cm) içinde üç farklı (3, 4 ve 5 anaç/5 lt) stok yoğunluğunda 12 saatlik canlı nakilleri araştırılmıştır. Kuluçkahaneye alındıktan sonra, açık tank naklinde yaşama ve yumurtalarını absorbe edenlerin oranı M. japonicus için %90 ve %17 olurken bu oranlar P. semisulcatus için %75 ve %40 olarak gerçekleşmiştir. Polietilen torbalarla yapılan nakilde her iki türde de stok yoğunluğu arttıkça çözünmüş oksijen konsantrasyonu ve pH düşmüştür. 3 ve 4 anaç/5 lt stok yoğunluklarında yaşama oranın %100 olarak kaydedilmesine ve yumurtalarını absorbe edenlerin oranlarının 5 anaç/5 lt stok yoğunluğundakilerden düşük olmasına rağmen tür içi ve türler arası yoğunluklarda yeterli (P < 0.05) fark bulunmamıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

TÜRKMEN, G., ÖZDEN, O., SAYĞI, H. (2007). Live transport of gravid penaeid shrimp (Marsupenaeus japonicus bate, 1888 and penaeus semisulcatus de Hann, 1884) broodstock with two different methods. Su Ürünleri Dergisi, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 1, 109–112. https://ajindex.com/articles/311404

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Anonim, 2005. Better Management Practices (BMP) Manual for Black Tiger Shrimp (Penaeus monodon) Hatcheries in Vietnam. NACA, 59s. Babu, M.M., and M.P. Marian. 1998. Live transport of gravid Penaeus indicus using coconut mesocarp dust. Aquaculture Engineering, 18: 149-155.
  2. James A., J. Wyban, N. Sweeney. 1991. Production of postlarvae: preparing shrimp for shipping. The Oceanic Institute Shimp Manual, USA, p.67. Johnson, S.K., C.E. Cichra, G.W. Chamberlian. 1984. Wet transport of mature marine shrimp in sealed containers. Texas A&M University Extension Fish Disease Diagnostic Laboratory Publication FDDL-S14. Texas A&M University, Colege Station. Texas, USA. Kocatas, A., T. Katagan, O. Ucal, H.A. Benli. 1991. Turkish Shrimp and Shrimp Aquaculture (in Turkish). T.C. Tarım Orman ve Köyisleri Bakanlıgı, Su Urunleri Arastırma Enstitusu Mudurlugu, Bodrum. Yayın No. 4, 143s. Kumlu, M., M. Aktas, O.T. Eroldogan. 2003. Pond Culture of Penaeus semisulcatus (De Haan, 1844) in Sub-tropical Conditions of Turkiye. Ege University Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 20(3–4): 367–372.
  3. Lumare, F. 1998. Crostacei Peneidi Tecnica E Gestione Dell’Allevamento. Manual Di Divulgazione Serie Acquacoltura, 4. ESAV, Roma.187p. Primavera, J.H. 1989. Broodstock of Sugpo (Penaeus monodon Fabricius). Aquaculture Extension Manual No. 7, SEAFDEC, Phillippines. 26p. Quinitio, E.T., P.G. Gabasa, F.P. Sunaz, E.P. Reyes, D.I.D. Pena. 1989. Prawn Hatchery Design and Operation. Aquaculture Extension Manual No. 9, SEAFDEC, Phillippines. 32p. Rao, L.H., M. Kathirvel, P. Ravichandran, S. Sivagnanam. 1995. Development of Broodstock and Maturation of Tiger Prawn Penaeus monodon in Captivity. CIBA Bulletin No. 6, Madras, India. 10p. Robertson, L., W.A. Bray, A.L. Lawrence. 1987. Shipping of Penaeid Broodstock: Water Quality Limitations and Control During 24 Hour Shipments. Journal of The World Aquaculture Society, 18(2): 45-56.
  4. Samet, M., and K. Nakamura. 1997. Relative Humidity Effects on Tolerance of the Kuruma Prawn Exposed to 14 °C Air. Fisheries Science, 63(2): 194–198.
  5. Shigueno, K. 1992. Shrimp culture industry in Japan. In: Marine Shrimp Culture: Principles and Practices (eds. A.W. Fast & J.L. Lester) pp. 641- 652. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam. Sumbuloglu K. ve K. Sumbuloglu. 2000. Biostatistics (in Turkish), 9. Baskı.
  6. Hatiboglu Yayınları, Ankara, 269. Turkmen, G. 2001. Still potential for Turkish shrimp. Fish Farming International, June, 41-42.
  7. Turkmen, G. 2005a. The First Tes