Journals / Su Ürünleri Dergisi / 2016 / Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 1

A case study for preventing illegal trawl fishery: The application of antitrawl artificial reef and design criteria

Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi Gökçeada Uygulamalı Bilimler Yüksek Okulu Balıkçılık Teknolojisi Bölümü, Gökçeada Çanakkale

Pages
27–34
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The duration of the project was expected as nine months and the total budget of the project (construction, transportation, deployment, renting etc.) was estimated as 8,046,856 TL

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The case study was carried out to prevent illegal trawl fisheries in İzmir Bay.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The number of trawlers fishing illegally off İzmir which were seized by Turkish Coast Guard (TCG) between 2010 and 2014 was approximate 160.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The duration of the project was expected as nine months and the total budget of the project (construction, transportation, deployment, renting etc.) was estimated as 8,046,856 TL
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2010 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The case study was carried out to prevent illegal trawl fisheries in İzmir Bay. Fishing ports, fishing vessels (length, engine power, commercial fishing licence etc.) and trawl net specifications (horizontal mouth opening, NH; trawl net length, NL etc.) were surveyed. The number of trawlers fishing illegally off İzmir which were seized by Turkish Coast Guard (TCG) between 2010 and 2014 was approximate 160. The plots of illegal trawlers caught in fishing area by TCG were marked on the map. It was obtained that trawlers fishing illegally smaller than 12 m and engine power of vessels were between 7 and 452 kW in İzmir. 98.2% of seized illegal trawlers in İzmir Bay had no fishing license and had maximum 286 kW engine power. Of these, 64% of trawlers were caught near coasts of Tuzla and Güzelbahçe localities. Therefore, two artificial reef sites (Tuzla and Güzelbahçe) were concluded in the Middle Bay of İzmir. While planning the project, banned dive sites for Preservation of Culture and Natural Heritage, previous artificial reef projects in the area, mud disposal site that is used during the cleaning of the inner bay, legal fishing activities, wave and current data in İzmir Bay and water depths were considered. Anti-trawl blocks were planned to construct reinforced concrete with 2.9 tones and 110x110x100 cubic centimeter. In the case where anti-trawl reefs are placed parallel to the coastline, total length of trawl gear (LG) was found as 167 m from the distance between the blocks (DB); warp length (WL), sweep length (SL), and NL. In other case (perpendicular to the coastline), minimum trawler was considered and distance between trawl doors (TD) was found as 22 m from NH, NL and, SL. Consequently, the distance between anti-trawl blocks and deployment depths were determined as between 25-200 m and 23-47 m, respectively. The protection ratio was 0.2 ha/number and total number of anti-trawl reefs was estimated as 6,808 for two artificial reef sites. The duration of the project was expected as nine months and the total budget of the project (construction, transportation, deployment, renting etc.) was estimated as 8,046,856 TL

Özet

Çalışma, yasadışı trol avcılığının yoğun olduğu İzmir Orta Körfezi'ni "örnek olay" biçiminde derinlemesine incelenmesini ve çözüm için planlanan ön hazırlıkları kapsamaktadır. Balıkçı barınakları, balıkçı tekneleri (boy, motor gücü, avcılık ruhsatı vb.) ve trol ağı özellikleri (yatay ağız açıklığı, YA; ağ uzunluğu, AU vb.) tespit edilmiştir. İzmir'de 2010-2014 yılları arasında, Sahil Güvenlik unsurları tarafından yasadışı avcılık faaliyeti sırasında yakalanan trol teknesi 160 civarındadır. Yasadışı avcılık noktalarına ait koordinatlar deniz haritası üzerinde işaretlenmiştir. İzmir genelinde 12 m'den küçük teknelerle kaçak avcılığın yapıldığı ve motor güçlerinin 7-452 kW arasında değiştiği belirlenmiştir. İzmir Körfezi'nde yakalananların %98,2'si trol avcılığı ruhsatı olmayan ve maksimum 286 kW motor gücüne sahip teknelerdir. Bu teknelerin %64'ü Güzelbahçe, Çamaltı Tuzlası ile Hekim Adası ve Çiçek Adaları arasında kalan alanda yakalanmıştır. Buradan yola çıkarak yasadışı trol faaliyetlerinin anti-trol yapay resifleri (ATYR) ile engelleme yoluna gidilmiş, "Güzelbahçe Y. Resif Sahası" ve "Tuzla Y. Resif Sahası" olmak üzere iki adet ATYR alanı belirlenmiştir. Kültür ve tabiat varlıklarının korunması için belirlenen dalışa yasak sahalar, bölgede yürütülmüş önceki yapay resif projeleri, iç körfezin temizlenmesi sırasında kullanılan döküntü sahası, yasal avcılık faaliyetleri, İzmir Körfezi'ndeki dalga yüksekliği verileri ve su derinlikleri dikkate alınmıştır. Donatılı betondan imal edilecek ATYR ağırlığı 2,9 ton ve boyutu 110x110x100 cm3 olarak hesaplanmıştır. ATYR bloklarının sahile paralel yerleştirildiği durumda, bloklar arası mesafeyi (BAM) bulmak için çelik halat uzunluğu (CU), palamar halatı uzunluğu (PU) ve ağ uzunluğundan (AU) av takımının toplam boyu (TB) 167 m olarak bulunmuştur. Sahile dik yerleştirilmesinde en küçük yasadışı trol teknesi temel alınmış, YA, AU, PU verilerinden trol kapıları arası mesafe (KM) 22 m olarak bulunmuştur. Sonuç olarak, 23-47 m derinlikler için, 200X25 m2'lik düzenle, 0,2 ha/adet yoğunlukta, her iki bölge için 6808 adet ATYR'ye ihtiyaç duyulmuştur. Projenin tamamlanma süresi 9 ay, maliyeti (inşa, nakliye, atım, kiralama bedeli vb.) 8.046.856 TL olarak ön görülmüştür

🔖

Cite This Article

ULUGÖL, M., DÜZBASTILAR, F. O. (2016). A case study for preventing illegal trawl fishery: The application of antitrawl artificial reef and design criteria. Su Ürünleri Dergisi, Cilt: 33 - Sayı: 1, 27–34. https://ajindex.com/articles/311105

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Agnew, D.J., Pearce, J., Pramod, G., Peatman, T. & Watson, R. (2009). Estimating the worldwide extent of illegal fishing. PLoS ONE, 4 (2): e4570. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004570 Akyol, O. & Ceyhan, T. (2009). Catch per unit effort of coastal prawn trammel net fishery in İzmir Bay, Aegean Sea, Mediterranean Marine Science, 10 (1): 19-23.
  2. Allemand, D., Debernardi, E. & Seaman, W. (2000). Artificial reefs in the principality of Monaco: Protection and enhancement of coastal zones. In: Jensen A., Collins K., Lockwood A. (Eds), Artificial Reefs in European Seas (pp. 151-166).
  3. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publ Ayaz, A., Ünal, V. & Özekinci, U. (2004). An investigation on the determination of amount of lost set net which cause to ghost fishing in İzmir Bay (in Turkish with English abstract). Ege Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 21(1-2): 35-38.
  4. Baine, M. (2001). Artificial reefs: A review of their design, application, management and performance, Ocean & Coastal Management, 44: 241- 259. Bombace, G., Fabi, G. & Fiorentini, L. (1993). Census results on artificial reefs in the Mediterranean Sea, Bollettino Di Oceanologia Teoretica Ed Applicata, 11, (3-4), 257-263. BSGM, 2012. Notification No. 2012/65 regulating commercial fisheries (in Turkish). Retrieved from http://mevzuat.basbakanlik.gov.tr/Metin.Aspx?MevzuatKod=9.5.16536& MevzuatIliski=0&sourceXmlSearch=3/1 (20.09.2015)
  5. Düzbastılar, F.O. (2003). Comparison of local scour depths and wave-current characteristics of cubic artificial reef models deployed in different arrangements (in Turkish with English abstract). Ege Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 20 (3-4), 383-390.
  6. Düzbastılar, F.O. & Tokaç, A. (2003). Determination of effects of artificial reef size on local scouring phenomena resulting from wave action (in Turkish with English abstract). Ege Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 20:(3-4), 373-381.
  7. Düzbastılar, F.O., Tosunoğlu, Z. & Kaykaç, H. (2003). Resistance calculation of the conventional and tailored demersal trawl nets with their gears theoretically (in Turkish with English abstract). Ege Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 20 (1-2), 15-25.
  8. Düzbastılar, F.O. & Lök, A. (2004). Primary materials in construction of artificial reefs (in Turkish with English abstract). Ege Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 21, (1-2), 181-185.
  9. Düzbastılar, F.O., Lök, A., Ulaş, A. & Metin, C. (2006). Recent developments on artificial reef applications in Turkey: Hydraulic