Journals / Su Ürünleri Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2

Gonad and gut indices of European Sea Urchin (Paracentrotus lividus, L, 1816) in Çesme Bay of Eastern Agean Sea

Çeşme Körfezi'ndeki (Doğu Ege Denizi) Avrupa Deniz Kestanesi'nin (Paracentrotus lividus, Lamarck, 1816) gonad ve mide indeksleri

Pages
59–63
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The gut index was higher in spring than in fall in this study.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The objective of present study is to determine the gut and gonad yield of Paracentrotus lividus populations occuring along Aegean Sea coastline and to evaluate of the environmental conditions on the gonad indices variability.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The wet gonad index peaked (6.22±0.56 %) in one (April-14°C) of the coldest months (between November-May) even though water temperature was not change so much between November and May.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The gut index was higher in spring than in fall in this study.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The objective of present study is to determine the gut and gonad yield of Paracentrotus lividus populations occuring along Aegean Sea coastline and to evaluate of the environmental conditions on the gonad indices variability. To achieve this, samples were gathered during twelve months and biometric measurements were done. The wet gonad index peaked (6.22±0.56 %) in one (April-14°C) of the coldest months (between November-May) even though water temperature was not change so much between November and May. It is determined that decreasing temperature affected gonad production but temperature is not only one factor effecting of gonad because of gonad indices were not high during the other cold months (between November-May) in this study. The higher gut index (GII) values were observed between January (6.31±0.71 %) and May (6.07±0.70 %). The gut index was higher in spring than in fall in this study.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın amacı Ege Denizi kıyılarında bulunan Paracentrotus lividus populasyonunun mide ve gonad verimini belirlemek ve gonad indeks değişimi üzerine çevresel koşulların etkisini değerlendirmektir. Bunu gerçekleştirmek içinde, oniki ay boyunca örnekler toplandı ve biyometrik ölçümler yapıldı. Kasım ve Mayıs ayları arasında su sıcaklığı çok fazla değişmemesine rağmen yaş gonad indeksi en soğuk aylardan biri olan Nisan ayında (14°C) pik (6.22±0.56 %) yaptı. Bu çalışmada, su sıcaklığının düşmesi gonad üretimini etkilediği fakat gonadı etkileyenin sadece sıcaklık olmadığı çünkü diğer soğuk aylar boyunca gonad indeksinin yüksek olmadığı belirlendi. Mide indeksi (GII) Ocak (% 6.31±0.71) ve Mayıs (% 6.07±0.70) ayları arasında daha yüksekti. Bu çalışmada mide indeksi ilkbaharda sonbahara gore daha yüksekti.

🔖

Cite This Article

KÜÇÜKDERMENCİ, A., LÖK, A., SERDAR, S., ACARLI, S., ACARLI, D., YILDIZ, H., YİĞİTKURT, S., KIRTIK, A. (2015). Gonad and gut indices of European Sea Urchin (Paracentrotus lividus, L, 1816) in Çesme Bay of Eastern Agean Sea. Su Ürünleri Dergisi, Cilt: 32 - Sayı: 2, 59–63. https://ajindex.com/articles/310982

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Agatsuma, Y., (1998). Aquaculture of the sea urchin (Strongylocentrotus nudus) transplanted from coralline flats in Hokkaido, Japan. Journal of Shellfish Research Vol. 17, No: 5, 1541-1547.
  2. Andrew, N.L., Agatsuma, Y., Ballesteros, E., Bazhin, A.G., Creaser, E.P., Barnes, D.K.A., Botsford, L.W., Bradbury, A., Campbell, A., Dixon, J.D., Einarsson, S., Gerring, P., Bebert, K., Hunter, M., Hur, S.B., Johnson, C.R., Juinio-Menez, M.A., Kalvass, P., Miller, R.J., Moreno, C.A., Palleiro, J.S., Rivas, D., Robinson, S.M.L., Schroeter, S.C., Steneck, R.S., Vadas, R.L., Woodby, D.A., Xiaoqi, Z., (2002). Status and management of world sea urchin fisheries. Oceanography and Marine Biology Annual Review 40, 343-425.
  3. Byrne, M., (1990). Annual reproductive cycles of the commercial sea urchin Paracentrotus.lividus from on exposed intertidal and a sheltered subtidal habitat on the west coast of Ireland. Marine Biology, 104: 275-289. doi: 10.1007/BF01313269 Crapp, G,B., Willis, M.E., (1975). Age determination in the sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus (Lamarck) with notes on the reproductive cycle. Journal of the Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 20: 157-178. doi: 10.1016/0022-0981(75)90021-0
  4. Ebert, T.A., (1988). Allometry, design and contraint of body components and shape in sea urchins. J. Nat Hist 22: 1407-1425. doi: 10.1080/00222938800770841 Guidetti, P., Terlizzi, A., Boero, F., (2004).
  5. Effects of the edible sea urchin, Paracentrotus lividus, fishery along the Apulian rocky coast (SE Italy, Mediterranean Sea). Fısheries Research 66, 287-297. doi: 10.1016/S0165-7836(03)00206-6
  6. Guillou, M., Michel, C., (1994). The influence of environmental factors on the growth of Sphaerechinus granularis (Lamarck) (Echinodermata: Echinoidea) Journal of the Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 178: 97-111. doi: 10.1016/0022-0981(94)90227-5
  7. Jangoux, M., (1987).
  8. Disease of Echinodermata, I. Agents microorganisms and protistans Dis. Aquat. Org. 2, 147-162. doi: 10.3354/dao002147 Keesing, J.K., Hall, K.C., (1998). Review of harvest and status of word sea urchin fisheries point to opportunities for aquaculture J. Shellfish Res. 17: 1505-1506.
  9. Kelly, M.S., Cook, E.J., (2001). The ecology of Psammechinus miliaris. Edible Sea Urchins: Biology and Ecology. J. M. Lawrence, Elsevier Science: 217- 224. doi: 10.1016/s0167-9309(01)80014-4
  10. Lawrence, J.M., Lawrence, A.L., Holland, N.D., (1965). Annual cycle in the size of the gut of the purple sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus purpuratus (Stimpson)