SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Su Ürünleri Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 3

The visual characteristics and quality of cultured gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata) in earthen ponds and net cages in Turkey

Gülgün F. ÜNAL ŞENGÖR
Zafer CEYLAN
Sevan GÜRÜN
SAMET KALKAN
Onnocan HULYAR
Pages
365–373
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore owing to their delicious food source of cultured gilthead sea bream it is preferred for consumption in Turkey and all ower the world.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The objective of this study is to investigate the quality differences and visual characteristics between cultured gilthead sea bream obtained from earthen ponds and net cage habitats.
📊
Key Findings & Data:No significant differences from obtained in two different habitats are determined cultured gilthead sea bream in terms of chemical and microbiological quality.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore owing to their delicious food source of cultured gilthead sea bream it is preferred for consumption in Turkey and all ower the world.
🔬Design:Lab & Field Experiment
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

The objective of this study is to investigate the quality differences and visual characteristics between cultured gilthead sea bream obtained from earthen ponds and net cage habitats. No significant differences from obtained in two different habitats are determined cultured gilthead sea bream in terms of chemical and microbiological quality. It has been determined that it is a safe food for consumption since it does not contain pathogenic microorganisms such as Escherichia coli and Salmonella spp. that negatively affect food safety. Visual quality differences are distinguished like the skin color, reddish color on the operculum cover, the head shape and the tail transparency from each other. Having unique sensorial characteristics fishes from two different habitats do offer valuable nutrient sources for consumers. Thanks to the controlled aquaculture conditions, safe production of cultured gilthead sea bream is carried out according to food safety in Turkey. Therefore owing to their delicious food source of cultured gilthead sea bream it is preferred for consumption in Turkey and all ower the world.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞENGÖR, G. F. Ü., CEYLAN, Z., GÜRÜN, S., KALKAN, S., HULYAR, O. (2021). The visual characteristics and quality of cultured gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata) in earthen ponds and net cages in Turkey. Su Ürünleri Dergisi, Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 3, 365–373. https://ajindex.com/articles/310961

References (5)

  1. Alpbaz, A. (2005). Çipura Yetiştiriciliği. Sayfa: 225-254. In A.Alpbaz (Ed.), Su Ürünleri Yetiştiriciliği. Alp Yayınları, 548 sayfa, ISBN 975-97056-1-3.
  2. Özden Ofset, Çamdibi-İzmir (In Turkish). Alasalvar, C., Taylor, K. D. A. & Shahidi, F. (2002a). Comparative quality assessment of cultured and wild sea bream (Sparus aurata) stored in ice. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 50, 2039–2045. DOI: 10.1021/jf010769a Alasalvar, C., Taylor, K. D. A., Öksüz, A., Shahidi, F. &Alexis, M.(2002b). Comparison of freshness quality of cultured and wild sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax). JFS: Food Chemistry and Toxicology, 67, 3220-3226. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2621.2002.tb09569.x Alvarez, A., Garcia, B.G., Garrido, M.D. & Hernandez, M.D. (2008). The influence of starvation time prior to slaughter on the quality of commercial-sized gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata) during ice storage. Aquaculture, 284, 106-114. DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2008.07.025 Anon (2005). Merck Food Microbiology application page 358. Ed: A.K. Halkman, Başak Matbaacılık Ltd Şti Ankara (In Turkish). Attouchi, M.& Sadok, S. (2010). The effect of powdered thyme sprinkling on quality changes of wild and farmed gilthead sea bream fillets stored in ice. Food Chemistry,119,1527-1534. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.09.038 Attouchi, M. & Sadok, S. (2012). The Effects of Essential Oils Addition on the Quality of Wild and Farmed Sea Bream (Sparus aurata) Stored in Ice. Food Bioprocess Technology, 5, 1803–1816.
  3. Beklevik, G., Polat, A. & Ozogul, F. (2005). Nutritional value of sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) fillets during frozen (-18 °C) storage. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, 29, 891-895.
  4. Caggiano, M. (2000). Quality in harvestin and post-harvesting procedures-influence on quality. Fish freshness and quality assessment for seabass and seabream. Cahiers Options Méditerranéenns (CIHEAM),1022-1379.
  5. Cardinal, M., Cornet, J., Donnay-Moreno, C., Gouygou, J.P., Bergé, J.P., Rocha, E., Soares, S., Escórcio, C., Borges, P. & Valente, L.M.P. (2011). Seasonal variation of physical, chemical and sensory characteristics of sea bream (Sparus aurata) reared under intensive conditions in Southern Europe. Food Control, 22, 574-585. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2010.10.007 Chang, K.L.B., Chang, J., Shiau, C.Y. & Pan, B.S. (1998). Biochemical, microbiological and sensory changes of sea bass (Lateolabrax japonicus) under partial freezing and refrigerated storage. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 46, 682