Journals / Research on Engineering Structures and Materials / 2021 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

Influence of interventions on the seismic performance of URM buildings designed according to pre-modern codes

Pages
315–330
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Capacity curves of the investigated buildings are derived to assess the most probable seismic response of the investigated housing construction in the region as well as to evaluate the seismic performance of the tested structures.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:On November 26,2019, an earthquake of magnitude 6.4 hit Durres city, Albania.
📊
Key Findings & Data:After the earthquake, the inspection carried out by the authors in the region has provided relevant findings regarding the methods of construction, quality of the materials and the performance of structures.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Capacity curves of the investigated buildings are derived to assess the most probable seismic response of the investigated housing construction in the region as well as to evaluate the seismic performance of the tested structures.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2019 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

On November 26,2019, an earthquake of magnitude 6.4 hit Durres city, Albania. After the earthquake, the inspection carried out by the authors in the region has provided relevant findings regarding the methods of construction, quality of the materials and the performance of structures. The dominant building types in the Albanian building stock comprise unreinforced masonry (URM) structures with load-bearing masonry walls. These units suffered the worst damage. Dynamic response of masonry is highly nonlinear, and generally shows high vulnerability to seismic loading. Moreover, many buildings of these type have undergone structural interventions like adding floors, or wall openings, especially in the first floors of the buildings, which are parallel to the main roads, because of great demand for shops and stores. This paper aims at making seismic performance assessment of the intervened buildings based on macro-element modeling approach. Due to its efficiency, this approach is becoming popular among the practitioners and field experts in this area and allows simulating the non-linear behavior of masonry buildings. This method is applied to two old masonry buildings from the Albanian construction practice that are representatives of mid-size residential buildings with and without interventions. It must be said that in Albania, masonry buildings have been built using templates all over the country, so both models with and without intervention are common. Capacity curves of the investigated buildings are derived to assess the most probable seismic response of the investigated housing construction in the region as well as to evaluate the seismic performance of the tested structures.

🔖

Cite This Article

SHKODRANI, N., BILGIN, H., HYSENLLIU, M. (2021). Influence of interventions on the seismic performance of URM buildings designed according to pre-modern codes. Research on Engineering Structures and Materials, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 315–330. https://ajindex.com/articles/310165

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Bilgin, H. and Hysenlliu, M. (2020). Comparison of near and far-fault ground motion effects on low and mid-rise masonry buildings, Journal of Building Engineering, Volume 30, 2020, 101248, ISSN 2352-7102.
  2. Hysenlliu M, Bidaj A, Bilgin H. Influence of material properties on the seismic response of masonry buildings. Res. Eng. Struct. Mater., 2020; 6(4): 425-437.
  3. Isik, E, Aydin MC, Buyuksarac A. (2020). 24 January 2020 Sivrice (Elazığ) earthquake damages and determination of earthquake parameters in the region. Earthquakes and Structures, 19 (2), 145-156.
  4. Ademović N, Hadzima-Nyarko M, Zagora N. Seismic vulnerability assessment of masonry buildings in Banja Luka and Sarajevo (Bosnia and Herzegovina) using the macroseismic model. Bull Earthquake Eng 18, 3897-3933 (2020).
  5. Ozmen HB. A view on how to mitigate earthquake damages in Turkey from a civil engineering perspective. Res. Eng. Struct. Mater., 2021; 7(1): 1-11.
  6. Milani G, Shehu R. Valente M. (2017). Seismic Vulnerability Mitigation of a Masonry Church by Means of CFRP Retrofitting. Procedia Engineering. Vol:195, 40-47.
  7. Hadzima-Nyarko M, Pavić G, Lešić M. Seismic vulnerability of old confined masonry buildings in Osijek, Croatia. Earthquakes and Structures. 2016,11(4):629-648.
  8. Penna A, Morandi P, Rota M. et al. Performance of masonry buildings during the Emilia 2012 earthquake. Bull Earthquake Engineering. 2014(12):2255-2273.
  9. Yılmaz S, Tama YS, Bilgin H. Seismic performance evaluation of unreinforced masonry school buildings in Turkey. Journal of Vibration and Control. 2013,19(16):2421-2433.
  10. Pavić G, Hadzima-Nyarko M, Plaščak I, Pavić S. Seismic vulnerability assessment of historical unreinforced masonry buildings in Osijek using capacity spectrum method. Acta Physica Polonica. A, 135 (2019), 5; 1138-1141.
  11. Kalman Šipoš T, Hadzima-Nyarko M. Seismic Risk of Croatian Cities Based on Building's Vulnerability. Tehnički vjesnik, 25 (2018), 4; 1088-1094.
  12. KTP-1963, Albanian masonry design code. (1