SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 3

Comparison of the Estimation Methods for the Parameters of Exponentiated Reduced Kies Distribution

Exponentiated Reduced Kies Dağılımının Parametreleri için Tahmin Yöntemlerinin Karşılaştırılması

FATMA GÜL AKGÜL
Pages
1209–1216
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally, a real data set is analyzed for the implementation of the proposed methods.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this paper, we consider the estimation for the parameters of exponentiated reduced Kies (ERK) distribution using maximum likelihood (ML), least squares (LS), weighted least squares (WLS), Cramér-von Mises (CM), Anderson Darling (AD) and right-tail Anderson Darling (RAD) methods.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The performances of the estimators are compared via Monte-Carlo simulation study for different parameter settings and different sample sizes.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally, a real data set is analyzed for the implementation of the proposed methods.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Exponentiated reduced Kies dağılımı · Parametre tahmini · Monte-Carlo simülasyonu

Abstract

In this paper, we consider the estimation for the parameters of exponentiated reduced Kies (ERK) distribution using maximum likelihood (ML), least squares (LS), weighted least squares (WLS), Cramér-von Mises (CM), Anderson Darling (AD) and right-tail Anderson Darling (RAD) methods. The performances of the estimators are compared via Monte-Carlo simulation study for different parameter settings and different sample sizes. Finally, a real data set is analyzed for the implementation of the proposed methods.

Özet

Bu makalede, exponentiated reduced Kies (ERK) dağılımının parametreleri en çok olabilirlik, en küçük kareler, ağırlıklandırılmış en küçük karaler, Cramér-von Mises, Anderson Darling ve sağ-kuyruklu Anderson Darling yöntemleri kullanılarak tahmin edilmiştir. Tahmin edicilerin performansları farklı parametre değerleri ve farklı örneklemler boyutları için Monte-Carlo simülasyon çalışması ile karşılaştırılmıştır. Son olarak, önerilen yöntemlerin uygulanması için gerçek bir veri seti analiz edilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKGÜL, F. G. (2018). Comparison of the Estimation Methods for the Parameters of Exponentiated Reduced Kies Distribution. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 3, 1209–1216. https://ajindex.com/articles/310088

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Kantar, Y. M., Şenoğlu, B. 2008. A comparative study for the location and scale parameters of the Weibull distribution with given shape parameter. Computer and Geosciences, 34, 1900-1909
  2. Akgül, F. G., Şenoğlu, B., Arslan, T. 2016. An alternative distribution to Weibull for modeling the wind speed data: Inverse Weibull distribution. Energy Conversion and Management, 114, 234-240
  3. Mudholkar, G. S., Srivastava, D. K. 1993. Exponentiated Weibull family for analyzing bathtub failure-rate data. IEEE Transactions on Reliability, 42, 299-302
  4. Mudholkar, G. S., Kollia, G. D. 1994. Generalized Weibull family: a structural analysis. Communications in Statistics – Theory and Methods, 23(4), 1149-71
  5. Xie, M., Tang, Y., Goh, T. N. 2002. A modified Weibull extension with bathtub-shaped failure rate function. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 76, 279-285
  6. Lee, C., Famoye, F., Olumolade, O. 2007. Beta-Weibull distribution: Some properties and applications to censored data. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 6(1), 173-186
  7. Cordeiro, G. M., Gomes, A. E., Queiroz da-Silva, C., Ortega, E. M. M. 2013. The beta exponentiated Weibull distribution. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 83(1), 114-138
  8. Kies, J. A. 1958. The strength of glass performance. Naval Research Lab Report No. 5093, Washington, D.C
  9. Kumar, C. S., Dharmaja, S. H. S. 2014. On some properties of Kies distribution. Metron, 72, 97-122
  10. Kumar, C. S., Dharmaja, S. H. S. 2013. On reduced Kies distribution. In: Kumar, C.S., Chacko, M., Sathar, E.I.A., eds. Collection of Recent Statistical Methods and Applications, (pp. 111–123). Trivandrum: Department of Statistics, University of Kerala Publishers
  11. Kumar, C. S., Dharmaja, S. H. S. 2017. The exponentiated reduced Kies distribution: Properties and applications. Communications in Statistics – Theory and Methods, 46(17), 8778-90
  12. Wolfowitz, J. 1953. Estimation by the minimum distance methods. Ann. Ins. Stat. Math. 5, 9-23
  13. Wolfowitz, J. 1957. The minimum distance methods. Ann. Math. Stat. 28, 75-88
  14. Luceño, A. 2008. Maximum likelihood vs. maximum goodness of fit estimation of the three-parameter Weibull distribution. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 78(10), 941-949
  15. Santo, A. P. J. E., Mazucheli, J. 2015. Comparison of estimation methods for the Marshall-Olkin extended Lindley distribution. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 85(17), 3437-