SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Politeknik Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 2

Modelling of Risk Indicators in a Smart Grid Newtork By Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process

Akıllı Bir Şebekedeki Risk İndikatörlerinin Bulanık Analitik Hiyerarşi Prosesi ile Modellenmesi

İlter Şahin AKTAŞ
TAYFUN MENLİK
Adnan SÖZEN
Pages
505–513
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The significance of the risks are determined by using Chang's Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (BAHP) Method, Enhanced Integral Value and Quadratic Mean Method.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In smart grid systems, a comprehensive risk analysis is required to be able to transfer supply of energy continuous and secure.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In this study, an advanced, multiple and detailed Risk Assessment Index Framework has been established for a smart grid system.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The significance of the risks are determined by using Chang's Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (BAHP) Method, Enhanced Integral Value and Quadratic Mean Method.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Akıllı Şebekeler · bulanık AHP · risk analizi

Abstract

In smart grid systems, a comprehensive risk analysis is required to be able to transfer supply of energy continuous and secure. In this study, an advanced, multiple and detailed Risk Assessment Index Framework has been established for a smart grid system. Risks are constituted as Financial, Security, Environmental, Technological and Management Risks. The significance of the risks are determined by using Chang's Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (BAHP) Method, Enhanced Integral Value and Quadratic Mean Method.

Özet

Akıllı şebeke sistemlerinde, enerji arzının kesintisiz ve güvenli bir şekilde yapılması için kapsamlı bir risk analizi gerektirmektedir. Bu çalışmada, akıllı şebeke sistemi için, gelişmiş, çoklu ve detaylı bir Risk Değerlendirme Endeks çerçevesi oluşturulmuş, riskler; Finansal, Güvenlik, Çevresel, Teknolojik ve Yönetimsel Riskler olmak üzere beş ayrı ana başlık altında toplanmıştır. Çalışmada, Chang’ın Bulanık Analitik Hiyerarşi Prosesi (BAHP) Yöntemi, Geliştirilmiş Entegral Değer ve Kuadratik Ortalama Metot yöntemleri kullanılarak risklerin önem dereceleri belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKTAŞ, İ. Ş., MENLİK, T., SÖZEN, A. (2020). Modelling of Risk Indicators in a Smart Grid Newtork By Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process. Politeknik Dergisi, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 2, 505–513. https://ajindex.com/articles/307429

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. ABB, “Toward a Smarter Grid ABB’ s Vision for the Power System of the Future,” 2010
  2. A. Janjic, S. Savic, G. Janackovic, M. Stankovic, and L. Velimirovic, “Multi-criteria assessment of the smart grid efficiency using the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process,” Facta Univ. - Ser. Electron. Energ., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 631–646, 2016
  3. A. Janjıc, S. Savic, L. Velimirovic, and V. Nikolic, “Renewable energy integration in smart grids-multicriteria assessment using the fuzzy analytical hierarchy process.,” Turkish J. Electr. Eng. Comput. Sci., vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 1896–1912, 2015
  4. Y. Li, X. Guo, H. A. O. Tang, and D. Li, “Construction of Hazard Source Evaluation Index System of Smart Grid,” no. Aiea, pp. 487–491, 2017
  5. W. Xiaojing, C. Xingyin, Y. Kun, and S. Haojie, “Construction of Smart Distribution Grid Efficiency Evaluation Index System,” IEEE Conf. Energy Internet Energy Syst., no. 2, pp. 1–4, 2017
  6. W. Xu, “Research on Risk Assessment of Smart Grid Project,” 2015
  7. R. Liu, “Preliminary Analysis of Smart Grid Risk Index System and Evaluation Methods,” Energy Power Eng., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 807–810, 2013
  8. D. B. Rawat and C. Bajracharya, “Cyber security for smart grid systems: Status, challenges and perspectives,” Conf. Proc. - IEEE SOUTHEASTCON, vol. 2015–June, no. June, pp. 1–6, 2015
  9. T. Hecht, L. Langer, and P. Smith, “Cybersecurity Risk Assessment in Smart Grids,” 5th Symp. Commun. Energy Syst. (ComForEn 2014), 2014
  10. T. L. Saaty, “Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process,” Int. J. Serv. Sci., vol. 1, no. 1, p. 83, 2008
  11. M. Daǧdeviren, D. Akay, and M. Kurt, “Iş deǧerlendirme sürecinde analitik hiyerarşi prosesi ve uygulamasi,” J. Fac. Eng. Archit. Gazi Univ., vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 131–138, 2004
  12. T. L. Saaty, The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill International Book, 1980
  13. A. Emrouznejad and W. Ho, Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process. CRC Press, 2012
  14. H.-J. Zimmermann, Fuzzy set theory and its applications, vol. 47, no. 3. 2001
  15. L. A. Zadeh, “Fuzzy sets,” Information and Control, vol. 8, no. 3. pp. 338–353, 1965
  16. J. A. Goguen, “L-fuzzy sets,” J. Math. Anal. Appl., vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 145–174, 1967
  17. G. Büyüközkan, C. Kahraman, and D. Ruan, “A fuzzy multi-criteria decision approach for software development strategy selection,” Int. J. Gen. Syst., vol. 33, no. 2–3, pp. 259–280, 2004
  18. M. S. Toshiro Terano, Kiyoji Asai, Fuzzy systems theory and its applications. Academic Press, 1992