SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Politeknik Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 4

Comparative Thermodynamic Assessment of Various Super- and Trans-Critical Working Fluids for Low Temperature Power Generation Applications

HASAN ÖZCAN
Sertaç Samed SEYİTOĞLU
Pages
914–921
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Even though R23 shows the best energy and exergy performances than those of other investigated working fluids at low-temperature applications, N2O and CO2 provide a clean solution to high GWP (global warming potential) R23 with similar performance characteristics at low and high temperature power generation applications.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Recently, energy need is exponentially increasing in the world while energy sources are decreasing rapidly.
📊
Key Findings & Data:CO2, N2O, and SF6 fluids are compared with the conventional R23 in three ORC configurations, namely the basic ORC cycle, regenerative ORC cycle, and reheat and regenerative ORC cycle, respectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Even though R23 shows the best energy and exergy performances than those of other investigated working fluids at low-temperature applications, N2O and CO2 provide a clean solution to high GWP (global warming potential) R23 with similar performance characteristics at low and high temperature power generation applications.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Organic rankine cycle · energy · exergy

Özet

Recently, energy need is exponentially increasing in the world while energy sources are decreasing rapidly. Therefore, this issue requires energy sources to be used more efficiently and urges professionals to utilize energy from low temperature energy sources such as waste heat and low temperature renewable sources. In this study, energy and exergy analyses of several clean working fluids are comparatively studied in several organic Rankine cycle configurations. CO2, N2O, and SF6 fluids are compared with the conventional R23 in three ORC configurations, namely the basic ORC cycle, regenerative ORC cycle, and reheat and regenerative ORC cycle, respectively. Effects of various selected system and environmental parameters on the system performances are comprehensively investigated. Even though R23 shows the best energy and exergy performances than those of other investigated working fluids at low-temperature applications, N2O and CO2 provide a clean solution to high GWP (global warming potential) R23 with similar performance characteristics at low and high temperature power generation applications.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZCAN, H., SEYİTOĞLU, S. S. (2017). Comparative Thermodynamic Assessment of Various Super- and Trans-Critical Working Fluids for Low Temperature Power Generation Applications. Politeknik Dergisi, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 4, 914–921. https://ajindex.com/articles/306566

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Liu B.T., Chien K.H. and Wang C.C., “Effect of working fluids on organic Rankine cycle for waste heat recovery”, Energy, 29: 1207-1217, (2004)
  2. Roy J.P., Mishra M.K. and Misra A., “Parametric optimization and performance analysis of a waste heat recovery system using Organic Rankine Cycle”, Energy, 35(12): 5049–5062, (2010)
  3. Lecompte S., Huisseune H., Broek M.V.D., Vanslambrouck B. and Papepe M.D., “Review of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) architectures for waste heat recovery”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 47: 448-461, (2015)
  4. Wang X.D. and Zhao L., “Analysis of zeotropic mixtures used in low-temperature solar Rankine cycles for power generation”, Solar Energy, 83(5): 605–613, (2009)
  5. Rayegan R. and Tao Y.X., “A procedure to select working fluids for solar organic Rankine cycles (ORCs)”, Renewable Energy, 36 (2): 659–670, (2011)
  6. Freeman J., Hellgardt K. and Markides C.N., “An assessment of solar-powered organic Rankine cycle systems for combined heating and power in UK domestic applications”, Applied Energy, 138: 605-620, (2015)
  7. Shengjun Z., Huaixin W. and Tao G., “Performance comparison and parametric optimization of subcritical Organic Rankine Cycle(ORC) and transcritical Power cycle system for low-temperature geothermal power generation”, Applied Energy, 88(8): 2740–2754, (2011)
  8. Ozcan H. and Dincer I., "Thermodynamic analysis of an integrated sofc, solar orc and absorption chiller for tri‐generation applications", Fuel Cells, 13: 781-793, (2013)
  9. Ozcan H. and Dincer I., "Thermodynamic analysis of a combined chemical looping-based trigeneration system", Energy Conversion and Management, 85: 477-487, (2014)
  10. Ozcan H. and Dincer, I. "Performance evaluation of an SOFC based trigeneration system using various gaseous fuels from biomass gasification", International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 40: 7798-7807, (2015)
  11. Hu D., Li S., Zheng Y., Wang J. and Dai Y., “Preliminary design and off performance analysis of an organic Rankine cycle for geothermal sources”, Energy Conversion and Management, 96: 175-187, (2015)
  12. Cengel Y.A. and Boles M.A., “Thermodynamics and engineering approach- 8th edition”, McGraw Hill, New York, 2014
  13. Zamfirescu C. and Dincer I., “Thermodynamic analysis of a novel ammonia-water trilateral Rankine cycle”. Thermochemical Acta, 477: 7-15, (2008)
  14. Hung T.C., “Waste heat recovery of organic Rankine cycle using dry fluids”, Energy Conversion and Management, 42: 239-553,