Journals / Politeknik Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2

Significance of Concrete Production in Terms of Carbondioxide Emissions: Social and Environmental Impacts

Pages
369–378
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The main objective of this study is to identify and evaluate the key sources contributing to CO2 emissions from concrete and compare traditional concretes with “green concretes”, concretes produced with blended cements and fly ash used as partial replacement of cement, in order to diminish the environmental impact of the concrete production.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Concrete is being recognized for its strong environmental benefits in support of creative and effective sustainable development.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Various efforts have been conducted by researchers to arrive at some alternatives that are able to significantly reduce high energy consumed and environmental impacts during fabrication process of cement.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The main objective of this study is to identify and evaluate the key sources contributing to CO2 emissions from concrete and compare traditional concretes with “green concretes”, concretes produced with blended cements and fly ash used as partial replacement of cement, in order to diminish the environmental impact of the concrete production.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Carbon emissions · environmental apects · cement production

Abstract

Concrete is being recognized for its strong environmental benefits in support of creative and effective sustainable development. In response to growing environmental and economic forces, regulatories, engineers, developers and owners are seeking efficient, innovative concrete solutions that conserve non-renewable resources. When considering the lifetime environmental impact of a building material -extraction, production, construction, operation, demolition and recycling- concrete is the most advantageous choice to meet these goals. Global demands for regulating concrete production waste arise from the growth of these environmental and economic issues. Various efforts have been conducted by researchers to arrive at some alternatives that are able to significantly reduce high energy consumed and environmental impacts during fabrication process of cement. Therefore, the concept of "green concrete" as an environmentally friendly alternative to conventional concrete has been emerging. This publication seeks to demonstrate how concrete contributes to future generations’ sustainable development, and will be of interest to architects, engineers, policy makers, contractors and clients, as well as others involved with the design, construction or operation of buildings and infrastructure. The main objective of this study is to identify and evaluate the key sources contributing to CO2 emissions from concrete and compare traditional concretes with “green concretes”, concretes produced with blended cements and fly ash used as partial replacement of cement, in order to diminish the environmental impact of the concrete production.

Özet

Concrete is being recognized for its strong environmental benefits in support of creative and effective sustainable development. In response to growing environmental and economic forces, regulatories, engineers, developers and owners are seeking efficient, innovative concrete solutions that conserve non-renewable resources. When considering the lifetime environmental impact of a building material -extraction, production, construction, operation, demolition and recycling- concrete is the most advantageous choice to meet these goals. Global demands for regulating concrete production waste arise from the growth of these environmental and economic issues. Various efforts have been conducted by researchers to arrive at some alternatives that are able to significantly reduce high energy consumed and environmental impacts during fabrication process of cement. Therefore, the concept of "green concrete" as an environmentally friendly alternative to conventional concrete has been emerging. This publication seeks to demonstrate how concrete contributes to future generations’ sustainable development, and will be of interest to architects, engineers, policy makers, contractors and clients, as well as others involved with the design, construction or operation of buildings and infrastructure. The main objective of this study is to identify and evaluate the key sources contributing to CO2 emissions from concrete and compare traditional concretes with “green concretes”, concretes produced with blended cements and fly ash used as partial replacement of cement, in order to diminish the environmental impact of the concrete production.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞANAL, İ. (2018). Significance of Concrete Production in Terms of Carbondioxide Emissions: Social and Environmental Impacts. Politeknik Dergisi, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2, 369–378. https://ajindex.com/articles/306502

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Ali M.B, Saidur R., Hossain M.S. “A review on emission analysis in cement industries”. Renew Sust Energ Rev 2011; 15 (5): 2252-2261. (2011
  2. Aydın, A. B. ve Sancak, E., “The Environmental Impacts of Concrete and Concrete Products”, 1st International Vocational and Technical Education Technologies Congress - MTET 2005, Marmara University, Istanbul. (2005
  3. Boesch M. E., Hellweg S. “Model for cradle-to-grate life cycle assessment of clinker production”. Environ Sci Technol 2009; 43: 7578-7583. (2009
  4. Boesch M. E., Hellweg S. “Identifying improvement potentials in cement production with life cycle assessment”. Environ Sci Technol 2010; 44: 9143-9149. (2010
  5. European Cement Association, Sited in: WWF: A blueprint for a climate friendly cement industry. (2004
  6. Flower DJM, Sanjayan JG “Green House Gas Emissions due to Concrete Manufacture”. Int J LCA 12 (5) 282–288. (2007
  7. Hendriks, C.A., Worrell, E., Price, L., Martin, N., Ozawa Meida, L., de Jager, D. and Riemer, P. “Emission reduction of greenhouse gases from the cement industry”, Proc. Fourth International Conference on Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies, August 30–September 2, Interlaken. (1998
  8. Holland, T.C. “Sustainability of the Concrete Industry – What Should be ACI,s Role”. Concrete International. Vol.24, No. 7, July, 35-40. (2002
  9. Humphreys K, Mahasenan M “Toward a Sustainable Cement Industry. Substudy 8, Climate Change”. World Business Council for Sustainable Development. (2002
  10. Huntzinger D. N., Eatmon T. D. “A life-cycle assessment of Portland cement manufacturing: comparing the traditional process with alternative technologies”. J Clean Prod; 17: 668-675. (2009
  11. IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Vol. II, Chapter 1.IPCC. (2006
  12. Kim, Y., Worrell, E. “CO2 emission trends in the cement industry: an international comparison” Mitig Adapt Strat Gl, 7, pp. 115-133. (2002
  13. Leese, R. and Casey, D. “Report on Embodied CO2e of UK cement, additions and cementitious material- Fact Sheet 18”, Mineral Products Association, MPA Cement, London, UK. (2015
  14. Lippiatt, B. C. and Ahmad, S., “Measuring the Life-Cycle Environmental and Economic Performance of Concrete: The BEES Approach.” Proceedings of International Workshop on Sustainable Development and Concrete Technology, pp.213-230.(2004
  15. Lundström, H. “LCA av Betongtakpannor – en Analys av Miljöbelastning Under Takpannans Livscykel”, Chalmers Industriteknik, Göteborg, Sweden (