Journals / Sağlık ve Toplum / 2007 / Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 3

Practice of hemodialysis patients related to using alternative therapy methods

Hemodiyaliz hastalarının alternatif tedavi yöntemlerine ilişkin uygulamaları

Pages
56–60
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: It was found that the most frequent method used was naturel product and there was no relationship between using alternative therapy methods and sociodemographic specialities.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: Hemodialysis patients feel themselves helpless because of being dependent to machine and this situation leads them to look for different treatments.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Method: Study was done with 125 patients who want to join this descriptive study between 10-21 July 2006 at two hemodialysis units.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: It was found that the most frequent method used was naturel product and there was no relationship between using alternative therapy methods and sociodemographic specialities.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2006 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Renal diyaliz · Tamamlayıcı tedaviler · Demografi

Abstract

Aim: Hemodialysis patients feel themselves helpless because of being dependent to machine and this situation leads them to look for different treatments. For this reason our study was done to determine the practice of hemodialysis patients about alternative therapy methods. Method: Study was done with 125 patients who want to join this descriptive study between 10-21 July 2006 at two hemodialysis units. Before study informed acknowledgement was taken from institues and patients. Data analysing was done with frequency, chi - square, student t test by using SPSS programme. Results: There was no relationship between sociodemographic specialities and condition of using alternative therapy methods of patients (p>0.05). 68.8% of the patients had no knowledge about alternative therapy methods but 49.4% of them applicated to alternative therapy methods and these methods were naturel product (50.0%), curative drinking water (22.5%) hodja (11.3%), hypnosis (9.7%) and special diet practice (6.5%). Itwas determined that 87.1% of patients did not mention about using any methods to health staff, 45.1% of them applicated this method because of helplessness and 43.5% of them said that they saw partly advantege from methods. Conclusion: It was found that the most frequent method used was naturel product and there was no relationship between using alternative therapy methods and sociodemographic specialities.

Özet

Amaç: Hemodiyaliz hastalan, makineye bağlı olmaktan dolayı kendilerini çaresiz hissederler ve bu çaresizlik onları farklı tedavi yöntemlerini arayışa sürükler. Bu nedenle çalışmamız, hemodiyaliz hastalarının alternatif tedavi yöntemlerine ilişkin uygulamalarını belirlemek amacıyla yapıldı. Yöntem: Araştırma 10-21 Temmuz 2006 tarihlerinde iki hemodiyaliz ünitesinde çalışmaya katılmaya istekli 125 hasta ile tanımlayıcı olarak yapıldı. Araştırma öncesi kurumlardan ve hastalardan bilgilendirilmiş onay alındı. Veriler, SPSS programı kullanılarakyüzdelîk, ki-kare, student t testi ile değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Hastaların sosyodemografık özellikleri ile alternatif tedavi yöntemi kullanma durumları arasında ilişki yoktu (p>0.05). Hemodiyaliz hastalarının %68.8'inin alternatif tedavi yöntemleri hakkında bilgisinin olmadığı, ancak %49.4'ünün alternatif tedavi yöntemlerine başvurduğu ve bu yöntemlerin, bitkisel ürünler (%50.0), şifalı içme suyu (%22.5), hoca (%11.3), hipnoz (%9.7) ve özel diyet uygulaması (%6.5) olduğu saptandı. Hastaların %87.1'inin kullandığı yöntemi sağlık ekibine söylemediği, %45.1'inin bu yönteme çaresizlik nedeniyle başvurduğu ve %43.5'inin yöntemden kısmen yarar gördüğünü ifade ettiği tespit edildi. Sonuç: En çok bitkisel ürünlerin kullanıldığı ve alternatif tedavi yöntemi kullanmanın herhangi bir sosyodemografık özellik ile ilişkili olmadığı belirlendi.

🔖

Cite This Article

UÇAN, Ö., OVAYOLU, N., PEHLİVAN, S. (2007). Practice of hemodialysis patients related to using alternative therapy methods. Sağlık ve Toplum, Cilt: 17 - Sayı: 3, 56–60. https://ajindex.com/articles/305856

References (16)

  1. l.Sarışen Ö, Çalışkan D. Fitoterapi: bitkilerle tedaviye dikkat. Sted2005
  2. 14(8): 182-187. 2.Ernst E, Cassileth BR. The prevalence of complementary/alternative medicine in cancer: a systematic review. Cancer 1998
  3. Begbie SD, Kerestes ZL, Bell DR. Patterns of alternative medicine use by cancer patients. MedJAust 1996
  4. Risberg T, Lund E, Wist E. Use of non-proven therapies. Differences in attitudes between Norwegian patients with non-malignant disease and patients suffering from cancer. Ada Oncol 1995
  5. Liu, JM, ChuHC, Chin YH, etal. Cross sectional study of use of alternative medicines in Chinese cancer patients. Jpn JClin Oncol 1997
  6. 2 7:3 7-41. 6. Kuzeyli Yıldırım Y, Fadıloğlu Ç, Uyar M. Palyatifkanser bakımında tamamlayıcı tedaviler. Ağrı 2006
  7. 18(1): 26-32. 7.Downer SM, Cody MM, McCluskey P, et al. Pursuit and practice of complementary therapies by cancer patients receiving conventional treatment. BMJ1994
  8. Shannon M. Alternative medicines toxicology: a review of selected agents. JToxicol Clin Toxicol 1999
  9. 3 7: 709- 713. 9. Taş F, UstunerZ, Can G, Eralp Y, Camlıca H, Başaran M, Karagol H, Sakar B, Disci R, Topuz E. The Prevalence and determinants of the use of complementary and alternative medicine in adult turkish cancer patients. Acta Oncol 2005
  10. Ceylan S, Hamzaoglu O, Komurcu S, Beyan C, Yalcın A. Survey of the use of complementary and altenative medicine among turkish cancer patients. Complementary Ther Med 2002
  11. ll.Algier LA, Hanoglu Z, Özden G, Kara F. The use of complementary and alternative (non-conventional) medicine in cancer patients in Turkey. European Journal of Oncology Nursing 2005
  12. Keyer Uysal M. Alternatif Tip. Harrison İç Hastalıkları Prensipleri (Editör: Yahya Sağlıker) I. Cilt, Nobel Kitabevleri, İstanbul, 2004
  13. Boon H, Steward M, KennardMA, Gray R, Sawka C, Brown JB, McWilliam C, Gavin A, Baron RA, Aaron D, Haines-KAmka T: Use of complementary/alternative medicine by breast cancer survivors in Ontario: prevalence andperceptions. JClin Oncol 2000
  14. BursteinHJ, GelberS, GuadagnoliE, Weeks JC: Use of alternative medicine by women with early-stage breast cancer. NEnglJMed 1999
  15. Richardson MA, Sanders T, Palmer JL, Greisinger A, Singletary SE: Complementary/alternative medicine use in a comprehensive cancer center and the implications for oncology. JClin Oncol2000
  16. Kara B. Kronik böbr