Journals / Sağlık ve Toplum / 2020 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 2

Evaluation of The Use of The Surgical Safety Checklists in a State Hospital

Bir Devlet Hastanesinde Güvenli Cerrahi Kontrol Formunun Kullanımının Değerlendirilmesi

Pages
108–113
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: As a result of the study, it was determined that SSC form was mostly filled by nurses and midwives.When the patient left the service and entered the operating room, the effective use of the form gradually decreased.It is thought that the planning of trainings related to the more effective use of this form by the institutions may contribute to the development of the culture of patient safety.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Object/Aim: The study was conducted to evaluate the use of the Safe Surgery Checklist (SSC) in a state hospital.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Methods: Retrospectively a total of 192 files of all A and B surgeries performed in the first 6 months of 2015 were examined and it was checked whether a total of 30 items in the Surgical Safety List were filled.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: As a result of the study, it was determined that SSC form was mostly filled by nurses and midwives.When the patient left the service and entered the operating room, the effective use of the form gradually decreased.It is thought that the planning of trainings related to the more effective use of this form by the institutions may contribute to the development of the culture of patient safety.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Object/Aim: The study was conducted to evaluate the use of the Safe Surgery Checklist (SSC) in a state hospital. Material and Methods: Retrospectively a total of 192 files of all A and B surgeries performed in the first 6 months of 2015 were examined and it was checked whether a total of 30 items in the Surgical Safety List were filled. Findings: Number and percentage distributions of the filled and unfilled substances are given. 30.21% of patients were male (n = 58), 69.79% of them were female (n = 134) and most of the operations (80.20%) has been identified as belonging to the orthopedic patients.When the data in the Safe Surgical Control Form were examined, large extent of (95.84 %) “Before leaving the clinic” section, which was filled by nurses and midwives, 94.9% portion of the “Before Anesthesia” section, 88% portion of “Before Surgical İncision” section, 39. 58% of “Before leaving Surgery” section which was filled by the surgical team, has been completed. Conclusion: As a result of the study, it was determined that SSC form was mostly filled by nurses and midwives.When the patient left the service and entered the operating room, the effective use of the form gradually decreased.It is thought that the planning of trainings related to the more effective use of this form by the institutions may contribute to the development of the culture of patient safety.

Özet

Amaç: Çalışma bir devlet hastanesinde Güvenli Cerrahi Kontrol Listesinin (GCKL) kullanımını değerlendirmek amacıyla gerçekleştirilmiştir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Retrospektif olarak 2015 yılının ilk 6 ayında gerçekleştirilen tüm A ve B grubu ameliyatlara ait toplam 192 adet dosya incelenmiş, Cerrahi Güvenlik Listesi’ndeki toplam 30 adet maddenin doldurulup doldurulmadığı kontrol edilmiştir. Doldurulan ve doldurulmayan maddelerin sayı ve yüzde dağılımları verilmiştir. Bulgular: Hastaların %30.21’i erkek (n=58) %69.79’u kadın (n=134) olup, operasyonların çoğu (%80.20) ortopedi hastalarına aittir. Güvenli Cerrahi Kontrol Formundaki veriler incelendiğinde özellikle hemşire ve ebeler tarafından doldurulan ‘Klinikten Ayrılmadan Önce’ kısmının büyük oranda (%95.84) doldurulduğu, ameliyat ekibi tarafından doldurulan ’Anestezi Verilmeden Önce ’kısmının %94.80, ’Ameliyat Kesisinden Önce ‘kısmının %88.55,’Ameliyattan Çıkmadan Önce ‘kısmının da %39.58 oranında eksiksiz doldurulduğu belirlenmiştir. Sonuç: Çalışma sonucuna GCKL’nin çoğunlukla hemşire ve ebeler tarafından eksiksiz doldurulduğu belirlenmiştir. Hasta servisten ayrılıp ameliyathane içerisine girdiğinde formun etkin kullanımının giderek azaldığı görülmüştür. Kurumlar tarafından bu formun daha etkin kullanımına ilişkin eğitimlerin planlanmasının, hasta güvenliği kültürünün geliştirilmesine katkı sağlayabileceği düşünülmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

AKIN, B., BOYACI, B., ÖZCAN, S., TANRIÖVER, F. (2020). Evaluation of The Use of The Surgical Safety Checklists in a State Hospital. Sağlık ve Toplum, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 2, 108–113. https://ajindex.com/articles/305515

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. Weiser T, Regenbogen SE, Thompson KD,Haynes AB, Lipsitz SR,Berry WR,Gawande AA,An estimation of the global volume of surgery: a modelling strategy based on available data,The Lancet Volume 372, No. 9633, p139–144, 12 July 2008 2. World Alliance for Patient Safety. 15. WHO guidelines for safe surgery. Geneva: 3. The World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist. Sparkes D, Rylah B.Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2010 May; 71(5):276-80. 4. Tang R, Ranmuthugala G, Cunningham F.Surgical safety checklists: a review. ANZ J Surg. 2014 Mar; 84(3):148-54. Epub 2013 Apr 18 5. Lingard L, Regehr G, Orser B, Reznick R, Baker GR, Doran D, Espin S, Bohnen J, Whyte S. Evaluation of a preoperative checklist and team briefing among surgeons, nurses, and anesthesiologists to reduce failures in communication. Arch Surg. 2008 Jan;143(1):12-7; discussion 18. doi: 10.1001/ archsurg.2007.21. 6. Sewell M, Adebibe M, Jayakumar P, et al. Use of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist in trauma and orthopaedic patients. Int Orthop 2011;35:897–901 [PMC free article] [PubMed] 7. Taylor B, Slater A, Reznick R. The surgical safety checklist effects are sustained, and team culture is strengthened. Surgeon 2010;8:1–4 8. Fourcade A, Blache JL, Grenier C, et al. Barriers to staff adoption of a surgical safety checklist. BMJ Qual Saf 2012;21:191–7 9. Levy SM, Senter CE, Hawkins RB, et al. Implementing a surgical checklist: more than checking a box. Surgery 2012;152:331–36 10. Patterson P. In survey, about half of ORs are using the WHO checklist. OR Manager 2009;25:1, 6–8 11. World Health Organization, 2008. 12. www.who.int/patientssafety/safesurgery/en/ Erişim tarihi:Eylül 2015 13. Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR, Lipsitz SR, Breizat AH, Dellinger EP, Dziekan G, Herbosa T, Kibatala PL, Lapitan MC, Merry AF, Reznick RK, Taylor B, Vats A, Gawande AA; Safe Surgery Saves Lives Study Group. Changes in safety attitude and relationship to decreased postoperative morbidity and mortality following implementation of a checklist- based surgical safety intervention. BMJ Qual Saf. 2011 Jan;20(1):102-7. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs.2009.040022. 14. Helmiö P, Takala A, Aaltonen LM, Pauniaho SL, Ikonen TS, Blomgren K. First year with WHO Surgical Safety Checklist in 7148 otorhinolaryngological operations: use and user attitudes. 15. Clin Otolaryngol. 2012 Aug;37(4):305-8. doi: 10.1111/ j.1749- 4486.2012.02486.x. 16. Treadwell JR, Lucas S, Tsou AY. Surgical checklists: a systematic review of impacts and implementation. BMJ Qu