SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Rekabet Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 4

A REVIEW ON FACTORS DETERMINING NATIONAL COMPETITIVENESS

ULUSAL REKABET GÜCÜNÜ BELİRLEYEN FAKTÖRLER ÜZERİNE DEĞERLENDİRMELER

Seyit Muharrem GÖKMENOĞLU
MUSTAFA AKAL
Remzi ALTUNIŞIK
Pages
3–43
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Then the advantages of these factor are compared against each other

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Giving importance to getting a high national competitiveness is increasing day by day in parallel with spreading information and communication technologies and globalization of the world economy.
📊
Key Findings & Data:To accomplish this goal, firstly the concept of national competitiveness and factors determining competitiveness must be identified.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Then the advantages of these factor are compared against each other
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Ulusal Rekabet Gücü · Ulusal Rekabet Gücünü Belirleyen Faktörler · Ulusal Rekabet Gücü Endeksleri

Abstract

Giving importance to getting a high national competitiveness is increasing day by day in parallel with spreading information and communication technologies and globalization of the world economy. To accomplish this goal, firstly the concept of national competitiveness and factors determining competitiveness must be identified. However there is no consensus in literature about this concept. Accordingly, in this study definitions of the competitiveness in literature are compared and evaluated. Besides, factors determining the competitiveness are examined according to economics and business economics theoricians, institutions which conduct studies on the measurement of national competitiveness and methodologies of the institutions, publish indexes which can be described as an indicator or determinator of the national competitiveness. Because these indexes are evaluating countries with micro and macro economic criteria. Then the advantages of these factor are compared against each other

Özet

Bilgi ve iletişim teknolojilerinin yaygınlaşması ve dünya ekonomisinin küreselleşmesine paralel olarak yüksek bir ulusal rekabet gücü elde etmeye verilen önem gün geçtikçe artmaktadır. Bu hedefe ulaşabilmek için öncelikle bu gücün tanımlanması ve bu gücü belirleyen faktörlerin tespit edilmesi gerekmektedir. Ancak literatürde ulusal rekabet gücü kavramı üzerinde hemfikir olunan bir tanımın bulunmadığı görülmektedir. Bu doğrultuda, çalışmada literatürdeki ulusal rekabet gücü ile ilgili tanımlamalar karşılaştırılmış ve değerlendirmeler yapılmıştır. Bununla birlikte iktisat ve işletme iktisadı teorisyenlerine, ulusal rekabet gücünün ölçümü üzerine çalışmalar yürüten kuruluşlara ve ülkeleri mikro ve makro ekonomik seviyede kriterlerle değerlendiren ve bu özellikleri ile ulusal rekabet gücünün göstergesi veya belirleyicisi olarak nitelendirilebilecek endeksler yayınlayan kurumların metodolojilerine göre ulusal rekabet gücünü belirleyen faktörler incelenmiş ve bunların birbirlerine karşı üstünlükleri karşılaştırılmıştır

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖKMENOĞLU, S. M., AKAL, M., ALTUNIŞIK, R. (2012). A REVIEW ON FACTORS DETERMINING NATIONAL COMPETITIVENESS. Rekabet Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 4, 3–43. https://ajindex.com/articles/302744

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. AIGINGER, K. (2006), “Competitiveness: From a Dangerous Obsession to a Welfare Creating Ability with Positive Externalities”, Journal of International Competitive Trade, No: 6(2), s.161-177.
  2. APPLEYARD, D.R. ve A.J. FIELD (1995),
  3. International Economics, USA. CHARBAUGH, R.J. (2005),
  4. International Economics, Tenth Edition,
  5. Thomson South-Western, USA. CHO, D. (1998), “From National Competitiveness To Bloc And Global Competitiveness”, Business Review, No:8(1), s.11-23.
  6. CHO, D., H. MOON ve M. YOUNG (2009), “Does One Size Fit All? A Dual Double Diamond Approach to Country-Specific Advantages”, Asian Business & Management, No:8(1), s.83-102.
  7. DAVIES, H. ve P. ELLIS (2000), “Porter’s Competitive Advantage Of Nations Time For The Final Judgement?”, Journal of Management Studies, No:37(8), s.1189-1213. DB (Dünya Bankası) (2009), Doing Business 2010, http://www.doingbusiness.org/~/media/FPDKM/Doing%20Business/Documents /Annual-Reports/English/DB12-FullReport.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 07.02.2012.
  8. DUNNING, J.H. (1992), “The Competitive Advantage of Countries and The Activities of Transnational Corporations”, Transnational Corporations, No:1(1), s. 135-168.
  9. DUNNING, J.H. (1996), “The Geographical Sources of the Competitiveness of Firms: Some Results of a New Survey”, Transnational Corporations, No:5(3), s.1-29.
  10. DUNNING, J.H. ve S.M. LUNDAN (1998), “The Geographical Sources of Competitiveness of Multinational Enterprises: An Econometric Analysis”, International Business Review, No:7, s.115-133.
  11. DURAND, M., J. SIMON ve C. WEBB (1992), “OECD’s Indicators of International Trade and Competitiveness”, OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No:120. FI (Fraser Institute) (2011), “Annual Report”, Economic Freedom of World, http://www.freetheworld.com/2011/reports/world/EFW2011_complete.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 03.02.2012.
  12. GRANT, R.M. (1991), “Porter’s Competitive Advantage of Nations’: An Assessment”, Strategic Management Journal, No: 12(7), s.535-548.
  13. GROSSMAN, G.M. ve E. HELPMAN (1989), “Quality Ladder and Product Cycles”, Nber Working Paper Series, No:3201, Cambridge. GRUBEL, H.G. ve P.J. LLOYD (1971), “The Empirical Measurement of Intra Industry Trade”, Economic Record, 47 (4), s. 494-517. HF (The Heritage Foundation) (2012), Index of Economic Freedom, http://www.heritage.org/index/pdf/2012/book/index_2012.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 05.02.2012.
  14. HOFSTEDE, G. (1980), “Motivation, Leadership and Organization: Do American Theories Apply Aboard?”, Organizational Dynamics, Summer, http://alangutt