Journals / Rekabet Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 2

Türkiye elektrik pazarındaki teknik etkinlik ölçümleri üzerine ampirik çalışmaların taraması ve sentezi

A review and synthesis of empirical studies on technical efficiency measurement in Turkish electricity market

Pages
43–64
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Thus, the robustness condition of the efficiency estimations should be first satisfied if they are used in regulatory proceedings to set electricity tariffs.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, we survey studies measuring the efficiencies in Turkish electricity market.
📊
Key Findings & Data:At the end of this survey, we observed an eager interest in electricity distribution market rather than generation market because of the data availability.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Thus, the robustness condition of the efficiency estimations should be first satisfied if they are used in regulatory proceedings to set electricity tariffs.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this study, we survey studies measuring the efficiencies in Turkish electricity market. At the end of this survey, we observed an eager interest in electricity distribution market rather than generation market because of the data availability. Another result drawn from these studies is that in Turkey private electricity utilities are more efficient than their public counterparts in both electricity distribution and generation segments. On the other hand, the studies reviewed suffer from a lack of consistency in terms of their efficiency estimations. Thus, the robustness condition of the efficiency estimations should be first satisfied if they are used in regulatory proceedings to set electricity tariffs.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, Türkiye elektrik pazarında etkinlik ölçen çalışmalar taranmıştır. Bu tarama sonucunda, verilerin bulunabilirliği sebebiyle elektrik üretiminden ziyade elektrik dağıtımına yönelik yoğun bir ilgi olduğu gözlenmiştir. Bu çalışmalardan çıkarılan diğer bir sonuç ise Türkiye’deki özel teşebbüslerin kamu teşebbüslerine göre hem elektrik dağıtım hem de üretim segmentlerinde daha etkin olduklarıdır. Diğer yandan, taranan çalışmaların etkinlik tahminleri arasında tutarlılık sorunu bulunmaktadır. Bu nedenle, bu etkinlik tahminleri düzenleyici işlemlerde elektrik tarifelerinin belirlenmesi amacıyla kullanılacaksa öncelikle etkinlik tahminlerinin tutarlılığının sağlanması gerekmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇELEN, A. (2013). Türkiye elektrik pazarındaki teknik etkinlik ölçümleri üzerine ampirik çalışmaların taraması ve sentezi. Rekabet Dergisi, Cilt: 14 - Sayı: 2, 43–64. https://ajindex.com/articles/302723

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. APPA, G., C.A.B. COSTA, M.P. CHAGAS, F.C. FERREIRA and J.O. SOARES (2010), DEA in X-factor evaluation for the Brazilian Electricity Distribution Industry, Working Papers, LSEOR 10.121, London School of Economics. BAĞDADİOĞLU, N. (1996), “Privatisation, Ownership and Technical Efficiency in the Turkish Electricity Supply Industry”, Pacific and Asian Journal of Energy, No:6, p.25-37.
  2. BAĞDADİOĞLU, N., C.M.W. PRICE and T.G. WEYMAN-JONES (1996), “Efficiency and Ownership in Electricity Distribution: A Non-parametric Model of the Turkish Experience”, Energy Economics, No:18, p.1-23.
  3. BAĞDADİOĞLU, N. (2005), “The Efficiency Consequences of Resisting Changes in a Changing World: Evidence from the Turkish Electricity Distribution”, International Journal of Business, Management and Economics, No:1(2), p.23-44.
  4. BAĞDADİOĞLU, N., C. W. PRICE and T. WEYMAN-JONES (2007), “Measuring Potential Gains from Mergers among Electricity Distribution Companies in Turkey Using a Non-parametric Model”, The Energy Journal, No:28(2), p.83-100.
  5. BAĞDADİOĞLU, N. and T. WEYMAN-JONES (2008), “Panel Data Stochastic Frontier Analysis for Energy Network Regulation”, www.cepe.ethz.ch/ workshop2008/Weyman-Jones, Date Accessed: 10.12.2012.
  6. BAĞDADİOĞLU, N. (2009), “Türk Elektrik Dağıtım Sektöründe Hizmet Kalitesine Yönelik Özendirici Bir Düzenleme Uygulaması”, Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, No:11(1), p.23-44.
  7. BAĞDADİOĞLU, N. and O. SENYÜCEL (2010), Service Quality Regulation in Electricity Distribution, paper presented in 6th International Scientific Conference, May 13–14, 2010,
  8. Vilnius, Lithuania. BAĞDADİOĞLU, N. and T. WEYMAN-JONES (2010), “Stochastic Frontier Panel Data Modelling for Incentive Regulation: An application to the Turkish Electricity Distribution”, İktisat, İşletme ve Finans, No:25(297). BAĞDADİOĞLU, N. (2011), Regulation in the Turkish Electricity Industry, T. Çetin and F. Oğuz (eds.), in The Political Economy of Regulation in Turkey, p.123-143.
  9. BANKER, R.D., V.M. GADH and W.L. GORR (1993), “A Monte Carlo Comparison of Two Production Frontier Estimation Methods: Corrected Ordinary Least Squares and Data Envelopment Analysis”, European Journal of Operational Research, No:67, p.332-343.
  10. BAYKAL, S. (2009), The Cost Efficiency Analysis of Turkish Electricity Distribution Firms, Unpublished M.Sc. Thesis, Eidgenöessische Technische Hochschule, Zürich. COELLI, T.J, H. CRESPO, A. PASZUKIEWICZ, S. PERELMA, M.A. PLAGNET and E. ROMANO (2008), “Incorporating Q