Journals / Rekabet Dergisi / 2015 / Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 3

ASSESSMENT OF NET NEUTRALITY REGULATIONS AND TRAFIC MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES IN MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF COMPETITION LAW

MOBİL İLETİŞİM HİZMETLERİNDE ŞEBEKE TARAFSIZLIĞI DÜZENLEMELERİ VE TRAFİK YÖNETİMİ UYGULAMALAR- ININ REKABET HUKUKU AÇISINDAN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Pages
51–100
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Based on the practices in United States US and in European Union EU , the study examines unilateral and collusive behaviors of mobile operators around the Articles 4 and 6 of the Competition Law

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Recent debate on net neutrality exhibits a particular importance for mobile communications services.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Mobil operators strive to decrease the substitution between their own services and the services offered by over–the-top OTT providers.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Based on the practices in United States US and in European Union EU , the study examines unilateral and collusive behaviors of mobile operators around the Articles 4 and 6 of the Competition Law
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Mobil iletişim hizmetleri · şebeke tarafsızlığı · trafik yönetimi

Abstract

Recent debate on net neutrality exhibits a particular importance for mobile communications services. Mobil operators strive to decrease the substitution between their own services and the services offered by over–the-top OTT providers. Although recent enacted net neutrality regulations in certain countries have limited the traffic management capabilities of mobile operators, they do not completely eliminate competition infringement risks. This study assesses net neutrality regulations and traffic management activities in mobile communications from the perspective of competition law, considering the dynamics of two sided markets. Based on the practices in United States US and in European Union EU , the study examines unilateral and collusive behaviors of mobile operators around the Articles 4 and 6 of the Competition Law

Özet

Son yıllarda internet ile ilgili tartışmaların merkezinde bulunan şebeke tarafsızlığı kavramı mobil iletişim hizmetleri için ayrı bir önem arz etmektedir. Mobil işletmeciler, kendi sundukları hizmetlerinin ikamesi haline gelen over–thetop OTT hizmetlerin etkilerini çeşitli trafik yönetimi uygulamalarıyla azaltmaya çalışmaktadırlar. Yakın geçmişte, çeşitli ülkelerde uygulamaya konulan şebeke tarafsızlığı düzenlemeleri, mobil işletmecilerin şebekeleri üzerinden geçen trafiği yönetme kabiliyetlerini belli ölçülerde kısıtlasa da, ortaya çıkabilecek rekabet hukuku ihlallerini ortadan kaldırmamaktadır. Bu çalışma, çift taraflı pazar dinamiklerini dikkate alarak, mobil hizmetlerde şebeke tarafsızlığı ve trafik yönetimi uygulamalarını rekabet hukuku çerçevesinde ele almaktadır. Çalışma, Amerika Birleşik Devletleri ABD ve Avrupa Birliği AB uygulamalarından hareketle, mobil işletmecilerin tek taraflı ve içerik sağlayıcılar ile birlikte girişebilecekleri davranışları çerçevesinde ele almakta ve Rekabet Kanunu’nun 4. ve 6. maddeleri kapsamında bir değerlendirme sunmaktadır

🔖

Cite This Article

ARDIYOK, Ş., DEMİRKAN, H., KÖKSAL, E., YÜKSEL, B. (2015). ASSESSMENT OF NET NEUTRALITY REGULATIONS AND TRAFIC MANAGEMENT ACTIVITIES IN MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF COMPETITION LAW. Rekabet Dergisi, Cilt: 16 - Sayı: 3, 51–100. https://ajindex.com/articles/302702

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. ANDERSSON, K., Ø. FOROS ve B. HANSEN (2012), “Empirical evidence on the relationship between mobile termination rates and firms’ profit.”, NHH Dept. of Finance & Management Science Discussion Paper 2012/10. ARMSTRONG, M. (2002), “The theory of access pricing and interconnection.”, M. Cave, S. Majumdar, ve I. Vogelsang (der.), Handbook of Telecommunications Economics içinde, North-Holland, Amsterdam. ARMSTRONG, M. (2006), “Competition in Two-Sided Markets.” The Rand Journal of Economics, No.37(3), s.668-691.
  2. ARMSTRONG, M. ve J. WRIGHT (2009), “Mobile call termination.”, Economic Journal, No.119, s.270–307.
  3. BELLI, L, ve P. D. FILIPPI (2016), “General Introduction: Towards a Multistakeholder Approach to Network Neutrality”, L. Belli ve P. D. Filippi (der.), Net Neutrality Compendium, içinde, Springer International Publishing, s.1-7. BEREC (2011a), Guidelines on Transparency in the scope of Net Neutrality: Best practices and recommended approaches, http://berec.europa.eu/doc/berec/bor/ bor11_67_transparencyguide.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 16.01.2016. BEREC (2011b), A framework for Quality of Service in the scope of Net Neutrality, http://berec.europa.eu/doc/berec/bor/bor11_53_qualityservice.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 16.01.2016. BEREC (2012a), A view of traffic management and other practices resulting in restrictions to the open Internet in Europe, https://ec.europa.eu/digital- agenda/sites/digital-agenda/files/Traffic%20Management%20Investigation%20 BEREC_2.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 16.01.2016. BEREC (2012b), Differentiation practices and related competition issues in the scope of Net Neutrality, http://berec.europa.eu/files/news/bor_12_31_comp_ issues.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 16.01.2016, s. 16. BEREC (2012c), An assessment of IP interconnection in the context of Net Neutrality, http://berec.europa.eu/eng/document_register/subject_matter/berec/ download/0/1130-an-assessment-of-ip-interconnection-in-t_0.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 16.01.2016.
  4. BEREC (2016), Report on OTT Services http://berec.europa.eu/eng/document_register/subject_matter/berec/ download/0/5751-berec-report-on-ott-services_0.pdf, Erişim Tarihi: 20.04.2016.
  5. BLOOMBERG (2005), Online Extra: At SBC, It’s All About “Scale and Scope”, http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2005-11-06/online-extra-at-sbc-its-all- about-scale-and-scope, Erişim Tarihi: 20.04.2016.
  6. BTK (2011), Şebeke Tarafsızlığı (Net Neutrality), https://www.btk.gov. tr/File/?path=ROOT%2F1%2FDocuments%2FSayfalar%2FArastirma_ Raporlari%2FSebeke_Tarafsizligi.pdf, Erişim