Journals / Review of Armenian Studies / 2012 / Sayı: 25

(Ermenistan'ın dış politikası: Küçük devlet ayrılıkçılığı)

Armenia's foreign policy: Small state irredentism

Pages
133–150
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this article Armenia s policy towards the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, Armenia's relations with its neighbors and particularly its relations with Russia and Turkey will be analyzed.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Armenian foreign policy showed how small states can also be source of instability in their regions if they became a part of the regional power struggle and if they are supported by one of the major regional power.
📊
Key Findings & Data:With the existence of Diaspora in various countries, Armenia could follow multi dimensional foreign policy and become important country for the transportation of regional energy resources.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this article Armenia s policy towards the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, Armenia's relations with its neighbors and particularly its relations with Russia and Turkey will be analyzed.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Armenian foreign policy showed how small states can also be source of instability in their regions if they became a part of the regional power struggle and if they are supported by one of the major regional power. With the existence of Diaspora in various countries, Armenia could follow multi dimensional foreign policy and become important country for the transportation of regional energy resources. However the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, Armenia s irredentist policy regarding the conflict and its relations with the neighbors did not allow Armenia to strengthen its sovereignty and to have constructive relations with its neighbors. In this article Armenia s policy towards the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict, Armenia's relations with its neighbors and particularly its relations with Russia and Turkey will be analyzed.

Özet

Ermeni dış politikası küçük devletlerin bölgesel güç mücadelelerine taraf olmaları ve bölgesel güçlerden biri tarafından desteklendiklerinde nasıl o bölgelerde istikrarsızlık kaynağı olabileceklerini açıkça göstermektedir. Birçok farklı ülkede diasporaya sahip olduğundan Ermenistan çok yönlü bir dış politika izleyebilecek ve bölgesel enerji kaynaklarının iletilmesi açısından önemli bir ülke konumuna gelebilecekti. Ancak Dağlık Karabağ ihtilafı, Ermenistan 'ın bu çatışmada ayrılıkçılığı destekleyen konumu ve komlu ülkeler ile ilişkileri, Ermenistan'a egemenliğini güçlendirme ve komşuları ile yapıcı ilişkiler kurmasını engellemiştir. Bu makalede Ermenistan'ın Dağlık Karabağ ihtilafına yönelik politikası komşuları ve özellikle Rusya ve Türkiye ile ilişkileri değerlendirilecektir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KASIM, K. (2012). (Ermenistan'ın dış politikası: Küçük devlet ayrılıkçılığı). Review of Armenian Studies, Sayı: 25, 133–150. https://ajindex.com/articles/302373

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. "ARF Issues Statement on Constitutional Court Ruling", Armenian Weekly, http://www.armenianweekly.com/2010/01/13/arf-issues-statement-on-constitution-court-ruling/, 13 Ocak 2010. "Armenia Agrees in Principle to Karabakh Peace Plan", Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty Newsline, 8 October 1997. "Russia's Medvedev Frustrated with Karabakh Impass", Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, http://www.rferl.org/content/russia_medvedev_frustrated_karabakh_impa sse/24248417.html, 27 June 2011.
  2. Abasov, Ali and Haroutiun Khachatrian, The Karabakh Conflict, Variants of Settlement: Concepts and Reality, Baku/Yerevan 2006, http://www.ca-c.org/dataeng/books/book-l/Abaso_Khachatrian.pdf,
  3. Abrahamyan, Gayene "Armenia: Obama Escapes Blame For Omission", Eurasia Insight, Başer, Bahar "Third Party Mediation in Nagorno-Karabakh: Part of the Cure or Part of the Disease", Journal of Central Asian and Caucasian Studies, Vol. 3, No. 5, 2008, pp. 86-114.
  4. Baranick, Michael J. and Samuel Schwabe, "In Pursuit of Peace in Nagorno-Karabakh", The Cornwallis Group XI: Analysis for Civil-Military Transitions, pp. 321-322.
  5. Croissant, Michael P. The Armenia-Azerbaijan Conflict Causes and Implications, London: Preager, 1998
  6. Croissant, Michael P. The Armenia-Azerbaijan Conflict, Causes and Implications, Westport, Connecticut, London: Praeger, 1998
  7. Fuller, Liz "Azerbaijan Floats Principles for Karabakh Peace Settlement", Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, http://wwvv.rferl.org/content/Azerbaii an Floats Principles For Karabakh _Peace_Settlement_/13 57686.html Fuller, Liz "Moscow Declaration A Victiry for Armenia", Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, http://www.rferl.org/content/Moscow_Declaration_A_Victory_For_Arme nia/1337592.html Hey, Jeanne A.K. Small States in World Politics: Explaining Foreign Policy Behavior, London: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2003, p. 5. Ismailzade, Fariz "Moscow Declaration on Nagorno-Karabakh: A View From Baku", Turkish Policy Quarterly, Vol. 3, No. 3, 2008
  8. Kasım, Kamer "Turkey, Russia and the US's Policy Towards the Karabakh Problem", International Conference on Nagorno-Karabakh Conflict and Its Solution Ways, Azerbaijan/Baku, Qafqaz University International Conflict Research Center, 28-30 May 2010.
  9. Kasım, Kamer "Armenia's Foreign Policy: Basic Parameters of the Ter-Petrosyan and Kocharyan Era", Review of Armenian Studies, Vol. 1, Issue 1,2002, pp. 99-100.
  10. Kasım, Kamer "Azerbaycan ile İlişkiler", US AK Stratejik Gündem, http://www.usakgundem.com/yazar/1990/azerbaycan-ile-İlişkiler.h