Journals / Selcuk Dental Journal / 2019 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3

Examination of cone-beam computerized tomography requests reasons

Konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi istek nedenlerinin incelenmesi

Pages
309–314
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

KEY WORDS Dentistry, cone-beam computerized tomography, radiography

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Background: The aim of this study is to examine retrospectively the reasons of CBCT requests and the distribution of these requests according to age, gender and departments among patients who applied to Gaziantep University Faculty of Dentistry Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology for various causes.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: In this study, the CBCT request forms of 1010 patients who attended to Gaziantep University Faculty of Dentistry Dentomaxillofacial Radiology Department between March 2017 and May 2018 were evaluated retrospectively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:KEY WORDS Dentistry, cone-beam computerized tomography, radiography
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2017 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Diş hekimliği · konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi · radyografi

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study is to examine retrospectively the reasons of CBCT requests and the distribution of these requests according to age, gender and departments among patients who applied to Gaziantep University Faculty of Dentistry Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology for various causes. Methods: In this study, the CBCT request forms of 1010 patients who attended to Gaziantep University Faculty of Dentistry Dentomaxillofacial Radiology Department between March 2017 and May 2018 were evaluated retrospectively. The reasons of the CBCT (Planmeca Promax 3D; Planmcea, Helsinki, Finland) requests, the departments requests, the findings of the region of interest and the field of view (FOV) were investigated. Results: A total of 1010 patients (462 male and 548 female) were evaluated. The mean age of the patients ranging from 5 to 85 years was 38.31 ± 18.53. It was determined that the most request was implant planning (47.72%). Tumor and cyst-like pathologies (23.07%), localization of impacted teeth and the relationship between adjacent anatomical structures (6.73%), orthodontic (3.76%), trauma (3.46%), supernumerary teeth (2.87 %), paranasal sinus pathologies (2.38%), dental roots-mandibular canal (2.18%), cleft lip and palate (1.58%), temporomandibular joint pathologies (1.29%) and other causes of request (4.96%) were found, respectively. Conclusion: CBCT, which is used in many fields in dentistry, was most requested for implant planning. Examination of CBCT requests reasons will contribute to determine the endications, frequency and limitations of CBCT. KEY WORDS Dentistry, cone-beam computerized tomography, radiography

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, Gaziantep Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Ağız, Diş ve Çene Radyolojisi Anabilim Dalı’na başvuran ve çeşitli nedenlerle KIBT çekimi yapılmış olan hastalardan KIBT istek nedenlerinin ve bu isteklerin, yaş, cinsiyet ve bölümlere göre dağılımının retrospektif olarak incelenmesidir. Gereç ve Yöntemler: Bu çalışmada, Gaziantep Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Radyoloji Anabilim Dalı’na Mart 2017-Mayıs 2018 tarihleri arasında başvuran 1010 hastanın KIBT (Planmeca Promax 3D; Planmcea, Helsinki, Finland) istek formları retrospektif olarak değerlendirildi. KIBT istenme nedeni, istek yapan bölümler, istenilen bölgeye ait bulgular ve KIBT çekim alanı incelendi.Bulgular: 462’si erkek 548’i kadın toplam 1010 tomografi istek formu değerlendirildi. Yaşları 5-85 arasında değişen hastaların ortalama yaşları 38.31 ± 18.53 idi. En fazla isteğin implant planlaması (% 47.72) amacıyla olduğu belirlendi. Daha sonra sırasıyla tümör ve kist benzeri patolojiler (% 23.07), gömülü dişlerin lokalizasyonu ve komşu anatomik yapılarla ilişkisinin incelenmesi (% 6.73), ortodontik amaçlı (% 3.76), travma (% 3.46), süpernümerer diş (% 2.87), paranazal sinüs patolojilerinin incelenmesi (%2.38), diş kökleri-mandibular kanal ilişkisinin değerlendirilmesi (% 2.18), dudak damak yarığı (%1.58), temporomandibular eklem patolojilerinin incelenmesi (% 1.29) ve diğer istek nedenleri (% 4.96) için yapıldığı saptandı. Sonuçlar: Diş hekimliğinde birçok alanda kullanılan KIBT’ın en çok implant planlaması için istenildiği tespit edildi. KIBT istek nedenlerinin incelenmesi; KIBT’ın kullanım alanlarının, sıklığının ve sınırlılıklarının belirlenmesinde katkı sağlayacaktır.Anahtar Kelimeler: Diş hekimliği, konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi, radyografi

🔖

Cite This Article

YALÇIN, E. D., ARTAŞ, A. (2019). Examination of cone-beam computerized tomography requests reasons. Selcuk Dental Journal, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3, 309–314. https://ajindex.com/articles/301727

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Cohenca N, Simon JH, Roges R, Morag Y, Malfaz JM. Clinical indications for digital imaging in dento-alveloar trauma. Part 1: Traumatic injuries. Dent Traumatol 2007
  2. Cotton TP, Geisler TM, Holden DT, Scwartz SA, Schindler WG. Endodontic applications of cone-beam volumetric tomography. J Endod 2007
  3. Exadaktylos AK, Sclabas GM, Smolka K, Rahal A, Andreas RH, Iizuka T. The value of computed tomographic scanning in the diagnosis and management of orbital fractures associated with head trauma: a prospective study at a level 1 trauma center. J Trauma 2005
  4. Scarfe WC, Farman AG. What is cone-beam CT and how does it work? Dent Clin North Am 2008
  5. Vandenberghe B, Jacobs R, Yang J. Diagnostic validity (or acuity) of 2D CCD versus 3D CBCT-ımages for assessing periodontal breakdown. OralSurg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007
  6. Scarfe WC, Farman AG, Sukovic P. Clinical applications of cone-beam computed tomography in dental practice. J Can Dent Assoc 2006
  7. Harorlı A, Akgül M, Yılmaz B, Bilge O, Dağistan S, Çakur B, et al. Ağız, diş ve çene radyolojisi. 1. baskı İstanbul
  8. Nobel Tıp Kitapevleri Tic. Ltd Şti
  9. p. 207-222. 8.Güven Y, Aktören O, Gençay K. Dentomaksillofasiyal bölge görüntülemesinde kullanılan üç boyutlu bilgisayarlı tomografi sistemleri 2008
  10. Halazonetis DJ. From 2-dimensional cephalograms to 3-dimensional computed tomography scans. Am J Orthod 2005
  11. Mozzo P, Procacci C, Tacconi A, Tinazzi Martini P, Bergamo Andreis IA. A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: preliminary results. Eur Radiol 1998
  12. Scarfe WC, Farman AG. Cone-beam computed tomography: White SC, Pharoah MJ. Oral Radiology: Principles and Interpretation. Mosby 2009. p. 225-43. 12.Dawood A, Patel S, Brown J. Cone beam CT in dental practice. Br Dent J 2009
  13. SEDENTEXCT Guideline Development Panel. Radiation protection No 172. Cone beam ct for dental and maxillofacial radiology. Evidence based guidelines. Luxembourg: European Commission Directorate-General for Energy
  14. Horner K. Cone-beam computed tomography: time for an evidence based approach. Prim Dent J 2013
  15. Acar B, Kamburoğlu K. Use of computed cone beam tomography in periodontology. World J Radiol 2014
  16. Warhekar S, Nagarajappa S, Dasar PL, Warhekar AM, Parihar A, Phulambrikar T, et al. Incidental findings on cone beam computed tomog